CHIEFS TAKE CHARGE


By TheSaracens.com
December 20 2025

It’s always unsettling when previews in the press mention statistics like “Exeter haven’t won at the StoneX for 8 years”. These runs have to come to an end one day and unfortunately that was today. Let’s be honest, on a perfect day for rugby Exeter got pretty much everything  right while Sarries got too much wrong. A late change saw Cinti pull out with Hartley moving to 12 and Tompkins to 13.

After an Exeter penalty kick (that resulted indirectly from Theo Dan’s wayward lineout – thankfully after that he was spot on - unfortunately Jamie wasn’t) things went Sarries’ way. First a lovely interception try from Noah  conveniently placed under the posts (just as well as Owen did NOT have his kicking boots on – or much else for that matter) followed shortly after by a Sarries’ drive with Willis coming off the back and finding Malins who wiggled through the gap and scored in the corner. 12-3. At this point Sarries seemed to be on top. Exeter were conceding a lot of penalties although the ever present threat of Woodburn and Feyi-Waboso was a constant annoyance down the left wing. For me one of the worrying things about the whole performance was the decision making and the match appeared to turn after about 20 minutes when Sarries were awarded a penalty dead in front just outside the 22. A gimme 3 points if ever there were so what did we do? Kick to touch, Exeter defended well and eventually cleared the ball.

This led to a period of sustained Exeter attack and the Chiefs appeared to have scored a try up the far end. The TMO and Mr Pearce were looking at something. The “try” looked like a double movement but that wasn’t what the discussion was about. Eventually, much to Sarries’ relief, Tom Hooper was given his marching orders for an illegal clear-out in the ruck (apparently it would have been red but for mitigation). 10 minutes down to 14 and boy did Exeter control it well. They were in possession of the ball for almost the entire period, kicked a penalty after Faz dropped a sitter and then scored a try through Varney with Slade using every one of the slotted seconds to kick the conversion and run down the Yellow Card clock. Half time and Exeter led by a point 12-13. Faz looked to be hobbling and we wondered if he’d return for part 2.

The second half began encouragingly although Sarries looked slow and their attack was constantly being rebuffed by a much livelier tribe of Chiefs. Finally Sarries got close but as Hartley flicked the ball wide to Noah, the white arm of Campbell Ridl knocked the ball on. After some discussion a penalty try was awarded and Ridl was off to the bin. Could Sarries build on this? Another 10 minutes v 14. The front row was replaced and Jamie’s first throw went astray. Apart from a superb break by Willis, Exeter once again were able to retain possession and run down the clock. Finally Sarries managed a sustained attack. The ball was going back and forth and there was a fair bit of juggling going on but finally Noah scored in the corner. The try was checked and the handling deemed to be OK. Faz again was off with the conversion – he seemed to be getting more and more annoyed with his game as time went on. Still 24-13 and a 2 score cushion.

Ivan Van Zyl was hobbling after a box kick and Jamie was on the floor. For once the play was up the Chief’s end. Eventually the ball went out. Jamie seemed to be drawing Mr Pearce’s attention to the challenge – looked like head on head between the two 16’s but probably a rugby incident. Mr Pearce went for a Sarries penalty so fair enough. Should have been a good attacking platform but Jamie couldn’t get his arrows straight, Woodburn and Feyi-Waboso gained good yards for Chiefs and they won a penalty in front. Decisions, decisions. The gimme 3 wasn’t going to be enough so they kicked for the corner and in true Chief’s style the rolling maul went over in the corner. Slade’s kick hit the post but it was now 24-18. Exeter seemed to have the upper hand now. More energy, more imagination, more desire. Greg Fisilau burst through as Sarries fell off their tackles and scored his 2nd. Slade converted and Chiefs were back in front 24-25.

Sarries had a huge chance to retake the lead with a penalty kicked into the Chiefs 22. The maul started mauling and everyone piled in. It was too far out though and the plan was too obvious – all Chiefs needed to do was get enough bodies in the way which they duly did and the ball was held up over the line.

As we went into the final 10 minutes, Sarries won a penalty just inside the Chiefs half and off centre. Decisions, decisions. Whose decision? Owen decided to take the kick. Why Oh why? His kicking was off all match, it was a tough kick and surely this should have gone to the 5m line. If they were going for the kick where was Daly? Faz took it and duly missed.  

Into the final 5 minutes and Sarries looked out on their feet. All they needed was to engineer a penalty or a drop goal, not impossible but again Exeter stood firm and gradually pushed Sarries further and further back – out of drop goal range, out of penalty kick range and finally out of the game when Slade intercepted the ball and scored unopposed. He missed the conversion from wide out which meant Sarries took 2 points from the game – more than they deserved.

It’s hard to know what’s gone wrong but sadly I think it’s linked to Faz controlling things again from 10. It has to be a retrograde step. Sarries have lost their last 3 Premiership games, 2 of those with Owen at the helm. The promise that was shown earlier in the season seems to have gone with the wind. Van Zyl was on one leg for the last quarter – why didn’t he come off? And who was making the decisions because whoever it was got it very wrong.

But we move on. We have to. We go to Castle Grim after Christmas – not an easy place to win but Gloucester are a pretty poor team (too!) right now. Something needs to change. Let’s hope someone knows what that is.

Saracens:

Daly, Caluori (Segun), Tompkins, Hartley, Malins, Farrell, Van Zyl; Carre (Mawi), Dan (George), Street (Riccioni), Isikwe, Tizard, Gonzalez (Onyeama-Christie), Earl, Willis (Wilson)

Exeter Chiefs

Woodburn, Feyi-Waboso, Slade, Ikitau, Ridl, Skinner, Varney; Goodrick-Clarke (Sio), Yeandle (Heaven), Tchumbadze (J Roots), Jenkins, Zambonin, Hooper (James), E Roots, Fisilau

Scorers

Saracens (24): Tries Caluori (2) Malins, Pen; Conv: Farrell

Exeter (30): Varney, Fisilou (2), Slade; Conv: Slade (2); Pen: Slade (2)

Referee: Luke Pearce

CHIEFS TAKE CHARGE
Posted by: TheSaracens.com (IP Logged)
Date: 20/12/2025 19:39

What do you think? You can have your say by posting below.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2025:12:28:20:51:17 by Darraghgirl.

Re: CHIEFS TAKE CHARGE
Posted by: ComeOnSarries (IP Logged)
Date: 20/12/2025 19:50

Thank you for the report. Very fair reflection of a disappointing day at the office

Re: CHIEFS TAKE CHARGE
Posted by: TommyKentish (IP Logged)
Date: 20/12/2025 20:10

Thanks for the quick report. I’m still stewing a bit on that performance. Without doubt Faz had an off day, I think laying 2 defeats solely at his door is harsh. I don’t think he was poor v Bath, they are the champions for a reason.

I’m struggling with this idea that we’re undergoing a great rebuild. I said in the other thread, we’re still outspending every other team according to a recent report. We’re stuffed full of current and former internationals but we can’t hold on to a lead. We just can’t seem to get the most out of some players right now. Earl is trying but nowhere near the ball carrier he is for England. Carré was Cardiff’s version of Willis before he left but fleetingly seems to get time on the ball. Tizard at Quins too but he has improved in other areas. We seem intent on throwing one up runners against two defenders each time today. Everyone knows Exeter have an enormous pack but we decided route one and zero deception was the best way to go.

It grated to see Exeter continually pull a nice inside pass back toward the ruck, make metres then work the ball quickly to the wings and get round our defence. We seemed incapable of that sort of “invention”.

As other people have mentioned the subs or lack thereof were incredibly frustrating.

Re: CHIEFS TAKE CHARGE
Posted by: JK12 (IP Logged)
Date: 20/12/2025 20:16

Our rebuild is the biggest work of fiction ... all our youngsters only play when we have injuries bar Calouri.

Sodeke is buried behind an invisible Isiekwe and pedestrian Tizzard. Bracken after a great game last week...didn't even get his usual last 3 mins today.

Really poor last few games and I feel we are trending in the wrong direction especially based on our resigning of dad's army.

Re: CHIEFS TAKE CHARGE
Posted by: #wolfpack1 (IP Logged)
Date: 20/12/2025 20:31

Quote:
JK12
Our rebuild is the biggest work of fiction ... all our youngsters only play when we have injuries bar Calouri.

I’m amazed how many people have bought into this.

The average age of wider squad might be younger, but the match day squad is the same and with the re-signing of Max and Faz actually getting “same-ier”.

Check out the 15 who started v Sale in the 2023 final, and see how many are our starters today (you can add Daly because he had only just come back from injury in 2023). There aren’t many differences…

There’s been no transition. That plaster is still to be ripped.

Re: CHIEFS TAKE CHARGE
Posted by: JK12 (IP Logged)
Date: 20/12/2025 20:33

Agree and we keep signing same players....

No ball carrying props...yep resign email

4 and 5 that are invisible...yep resign em

Ageing centres you say...yep resign em

Madness
..

Re: CHIEFS TAKE CHARGE
Posted by: #wolfpack1 (IP Logged)
Date: 20/12/2025 20:41

Agree entirely JK

Re: CHIEFS TAKE CHARGE
Posted by: PaulHerox (IP Logged)
Date: 20/12/2025 20:48

Good balanced report and much "fairer" than I would have been.

Agree about going for the corner v the first kick at goal. Farrell seemed to make the call regardless of Van-Zyl being captain. Same about the kick from distance which normally Daly would take, Farrell made the call he was taking it.
Who over-rules him in that set-up when he's not playing well, not captaining and yet still deciding what we do?

Re the rebuild I do think it's fair to point out that injuries are often the pathway to players establishing themselves. With no real A-League and the PRC only briefly an option there are limited opportunities for game time.
Elliott last season was a beneficiary of injuries to get a long run. I guess the interesting question is without an injury of his own would he have kept his place or would it have been returned to the incumbent.

You could say the same with the centres to a degree as injury has robbed us of seeing whether they would have been backed to come through otherwise.

Re: CHIEFS TAKE CHARGE
Posted by: TommyKentish (IP Logged)
Date: 20/12/2025 21:17

Maybe I’m misremembering but wasn’t Elliott first choice regardless of other injuries? Caluori has benefited from his absence.

Re: CHIEFS TAKE CHARGE
Posted by: jimfitz12 (IP Logged)
Date: 20/12/2025 21:31

For me, we just don’t have enough players (outside of Maro, JMG and maybe earl) who are willing to put the team on their shoulders when times are tough and carry us through to victory.

Honestly, IVZ is my fourth choice scrum half right now, behind Charlie, Simpson and Asa. That was on of the worst scrum half performances I’ve seen in 32 years of following the team,

Nick I, who I sympathise with due to his open heart surgery, as must have been horrific coming back from that, is completely and utterly useless now. he was 0 impart on the game and looks completely unfit.

Re: CHIEFS TAKE CHARGE
Posted by: PaulHerox (IP Logged)
Date: 21/12/2025 09:12

Quote:
TommyKentish
Maybe I’m misremembering but wasn’t Elliott first choice regardless of other injuries? Caluori has benefited from his absence.

You might be right. My memory is that he played because Segun and Cinti were both injured, then didn't Jackson get a game and also get injured? Not sure about the Jackson bit but pretty confident about the injuries that gave Elliott his chance.

Re: CHIEFS TAKE CHARGE
Posted by: JK12 (IP Logged)
Date: 21/12/2025 09:36

We are not transitioning... its simply a tagine we keep using.

We have no young props , a young lock who is getting zero playing time , all our young back rowers are buried , our scrum half cant get a regular start and none of the centres start unless there's injury. Calouri feels like we fell into him rather than started deliberately

Its a fallacy we have a balance of youth and exp each game...frankly we have much the same staring 15 as for last 2 years and its still under performing.

Re: CHIEFS TAKE CHARGE
Posted by: maynas (IP Logged)
Date: 21/12/2025 10:17

Quote:
JK12
Our rebuild is the biggest work of fiction ... all our youngsters only play when we have injuries bar Calouri.
Sodeke is buried behind an invisible Isiekwe and pedestrian Tizzard. Bracken after a great game last week...didn't even get his usual last 3 mins today.

Really poor last few games and I feel we are trending in the wrong direction especially based on our resigning of dad's army.

Agreed, not bringing on Bracken for an obviously injured Van Zyl shows little faith by the coaches. Odds on he’s off to Bath next!

Re: CHIEFS TAKE CHARGE
Posted by: JK12 (IP Logged)
Date: 21/12/2025 10:30

I think that point is extremely valid..always felt Spencer would have stayed if we had shown commitment to him earlier.

Last 3 years we have gone backwards relying on same players and reigning them regardless of our overall performance

How many none Saracens have we brought jn who were truly top class... people talk about Brits , Burgers etc. We have none of that type.. we have players who talk a good dame such as NI , TM , IVZ but dont lead by example.

Re: CHIEFS TAKE CHARGE
Posted by: Stonexjim (IP Logged)
Date: 21/12/2025 10:52

Quote:
JK12
We are not transitioning... its simply a tagine we keep using.
We have no young props , a young lock who is getting zero playing time , all our young back rowers are buried , our scrum half cant get a regular start and none of the centres start unless there's injury. Calouri feels like we fell into him rather than started deliberately

Its a fallacy we have a balance of youth and exp each game...frankly we have much the same staring 15 as for last 2 years and its still under performing.

It’s literally impossible for me to agree with this more.

Re: CHIEFS TAKE CHARGE
Posted by: Debenair (IP Logged)
Date: 21/12/2025 11:08

Chiefs fan in peace. Generally a very balanced report. A little at odds with some of the comments on the preview thread, which even I as a partial reader think somewhat unfair. Faz and a number of other players are being forced to face up to the inevitable and unavoidable march of time, with its impact on fitness. I commented previously on the same in connection with the Vunipolae, and at home re Armand and others. There is no fault involved on the players part it is simply anno domini and the relentless soft tissue injuries sustained on a weekly basis coupled with the occasional serious injury from which it becomes increasingly difficult to recover in short order.
I was pleased and surprised at the Chiefs performance but think that the away win on a dank Friday in Salford at the start of the month was a huge filip. Even when we went 9 points down I wasn’t too worried because our backs were making such yardage every time we ran back the ball.
My own POTM was Woodburn who I thought immense in the aerial battle every time the ball was hoofed his way.Not too shabby for an old winger covering fullback.
The other point you mentioned was the lack of oomph Saracens exhibited in the last minutes. That seemed encapsulated by Slade easing away from the pursuing Malins for the final score, and then the latter seeming to try and ease what looked like cramp as Slade lined up the conversion. Is fitness an issue across the board, or was it the flight fatigue from the SA trip kicking in?
Finally, it was very interesting to listen to the match commentators comment about the best attack in the league up against the best defence. In my mind despite what the seasons stats may say neither team would feature in my top 3 in either category. I was also surprised Chiefs won by leaking 16 penalties, although most of the other stats( yards run, clean breaks, tackle percentage , but not possession or territory) went Devonwards.
A fascinating game. The rest of the season will be interesting to see if either side can worry the big 3, Bath, Saints, and Tigers.

Re: CHIEFS TAKE CHARGE
Posted by: TommyKentish (IP Logged)
Date: 21/12/2025 11:26

Chiefs have a far better chance of troubling Bath and Saints. It’s been discussed elsewhere but you have a clear identity and as always with Baxter everyone knows exactly what they are doing with a relatively simple game plan but a very effective one. I’m not really sure what we’re trying to do.

On Faz I think you targeted him very well, him made 14 tackles yesterday which no doubt fatigued him and makes his non-substitution a bigger head scratcher. What is it Baxter always says about how many times you can get off the floor quickly?

Congrats on the win, Exeter have had some painful seasons recently but it looks like you’ll be reaping the rewards in the near future. Best of luck for the rest of the season.

Re: CHIEFS TAKE CHARGE
Posted by: Alexkid79 (IP Logged)
Date: 21/12/2025 12:10

I thought Exeter were great. Their defence was immense at times. The chop tackle in particular was a great tactic to stop us at the gain line. There were times I thought the ref could have pinged them for not rolling away quick enough. And when they did roll, it always seemed to be in the way of Ivan. Thats not to say that we didn't get the rub of the green with some of the decisions too. The yellow for Hooper was crazy. It was a pen, but not a yellow. None of the replays showed anything too dangerous. Chiefs managed the cards well though and showed great discipline. A frustrating day for us as fans. I don't think I have felt that cross at a final whistle for some time. I was watching on TV and I was grateful the game was on the red button with limited pitch-side cameras, because if I had caught sight of a smiling Tony Rowe I might have put my size 10 through the TV! Cannot stand that man.

Re: CHIEFS TAKE CHARGE
Posted by: The Bard (IP Logged)
Date: 21/12/2025 12:54

Woodburn particularly and Slade excellent for Chiefs. I did wonder whether some of the chop tackles had any arms involved, think one did get pinged.
We’d clearly decided on one set of backs for Durban and another here with Daly the only constant. The late change can’t have helped, might have been bettter to start Fergus and shift Owen to 12 but who knows?
Still cannot fathom why Burke and Bracken left unused when the half backs were poor and not even making good decisions.
Theo Dan excellent, thought we were pushing our luck with only two likely jumpers. Scrum went well, Marcus Street beginning to look like a good signing.

Re: CHIEFS TAKE CHARGE
Posted by: TommyKentish (IP Logged)
Date: 21/12/2025 13:13

Quote:
Alexkid79
There were times I thought the ref could have pinged them for not rolling away quick enough. And when they did roll, it always seemed to be in the way of Ivan.

Bath did this very well too, it was very frustrating to get pinged by Pearce for 3 points when it went the other way. As you say though, decisions go either way. We need to learn how to deal with this, either in our communication with the ref or our tactics.

Re: CHIEFS TAKE CHARGE
Posted by: saracensfan62 (IP Logged)
Date: 21/12/2025 17:36

Thank you DG for an excellent report. Exeter deserved their win so credit where credit is due and well done to them. My only complaint was the 2 Chiefs fans who sat behind us and felt the need to give their running commentary on every single aspect of the game. Always happy to listen to thoughts, but if I wanted a running commentary, I'd just stay at home and watch the whole game on TV!

A very disappointing game to watch (especially the last 20 minutes when silly mistakes kept on creeping in) and we seemed to have no response at all. Hopefully we will be able to bounce back after the Christmas break at Kingsholm.

Re: CHIEFS TAKE CHARGE
Posted by: PaulHerox (IP Logged)
Date: 23/12/2025 02:46

Quote:
jimfitz12
That was on of the worst scrum half performances I’ve seen in 32 years of following the team

This is so far off the reality of what happened in the game it's bewildering.
I'm interested in how you felt we were badly served by Van-Zyl at 9.

Having watched it again his delivery is quick throughout the game. There are certainly moments when it slows down especially later and there's the odd wayward kick and a pass to no one later on but the vast majority of his play is getting to rucks quickly and playing away.
This play is vital in the tempo we achieved in the first half in particular and a theme of our breaks up field is him keeping us moving with the tempo provided by the carrying of Willis and Dan. Great tap and go too.
Add to that his normal moping up job in defence when other players have missed their men and solid box-kicking and it's hard to work out what about his performance justifies that comment.

Watching games so far this season the one obvious change in our attack is that we have improved our ruck speed considerably. That's been consistent with both Van-Zyl and Bracken compared to last season.

It seemed to me in this game we struggled to capitalise on that quick ball because our attack was so often quite deep and we were too often simply putting miss one passes to midfield rather than challenging the defence with a greater variation of passing as Chiefs did.
We troubled Chiefs defence most with Malins running lines off Tompkins playing flat to the gainline and when Hartley offloaded having committed defence. Expanding those areas of play would be great to see.

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment. We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals. We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards. If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing abuse@sportnetwork.net