Hoops continues as captain
Controversial choice?
By Stuart Anderton
August 28 2013
In a move which will doubtless stir up the usual debate, Stuart Hooper has been confirmed as club captain.
Gary Gold made the announcement today:
"Stuart is a consummate professional, both on and off the pitch, and is the embodiment of the standards we expect of all the players here at Bath. His work ethic is second to none, he's a very intelligent player and he talks very well. His leadership qualities are unquestioned, and he has the utmost respect of all the players and staff at the Club.
"We are fortunate to have some very strong leaders within the squad, with the likes of Rob Webber, Dave Attwood, Peter Stringer, Francois Louw and Paul James. They, along with Stuart, will form our leadership group for the season, making sure that the high standards we set ourselves on and off the pitch are met."
Stuart added: "I am of course delighted and honoured to be asked by Gary and the coaches to captain Bath for another season. We have a very exciting squad here that I am very proud to lead, and we are all looking forward to getting out on the pitch and getting the season underway."
Many on COML don't beleive that Hoops should start and therefore shoudn't be captain; others have doubted his on pitch leadership when the chips are down. While still more, of course, rate him really highly as player and captain. But it's been a hotly debated issue.
But whatever an element of supporters think, it is Hoops who will be leading us to (hopefully) glory this coming season.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.
OBinExile
Quote:What do you think?
Good!
"Come on you Bath!"
Looking forward to a great season.
Quote:Bri
Good luck Hoops,top man,top captain,top choice.
Well said Bri. You cannot question Hoops passion and whether you agree with it or not, that's the way it is!
That is my opinion, I thought I would share it!
I'd be amazed if any but the most concerted onion on here swayed the direction of the club. It is not the purpose of this board to do so. What this board is for is to discuss our opinions. So I find the attitude of, as I see it, decision made lets move on, rather at odds with this.
As Club Captain, his most important qualities will be those that raise the capability of the team to win whilst off the pitch. In this I would include a dedication to the club, not accepting anything but the most dedicated attitude towards training and helping raise the desire to win. In this regard, I think it is a good appointment.
The captain on the pitch plays a more tactical role. If Hoops is on the pitch, I think he has tactical awareness but I have never been convinced that he does enough to motivate players during difficult patches.
I am not sure that anybody, with maybe the exception of Flo, has really impressed me in their ability to motivate others on the pitch since we lost Borthers.
In short an excellent club captain but I am not sure that we have any truly outstanding team captains. Happy to be proved wrong by Hoops or whoever else holds the band on the pitch this year.
Quote:DanWiley
So no different to any other topic then?
I'd be amazed if any but the most concerted onion on here swayed the direction of the club. It is not the purpose of this board to do so. What this board is for is to discuss our opinions. So I find the attitude of, as I see it, decision made lets move on, rather at odds with this.
Dan are concerted onions a staple diet of porps?
Quote:DanWiley
So no different to any other topic then?
Well actually I do think that there is a slight difference.
The subject has been done to death so many times, the end result is that nothing has changed and Hoops is captain, endorsed by club and fellow players more times than I can remember. Add to that the overt support of ex-players such as Flatman, and the counter argument is that someone on here wants to continually berate him because he did not openly clobber another player when provoked.
The other difference is that we are at the start of a new season, some positive support for the club may just be of some benefit.
But as you put it yourself your care for the club has reduced so I guess that figures.
I also hope that the coaching staff don't feel constrained by this choice to play him even if he's not one of the best 2 locks fit and available; I don't think we're a strong enough team to carry a captain.
As said above; we have strengthened the pack around him; so this may allow him to concentrate on the tactics and line-out.
It's not the decision I'd have made; but I feel my reasoning has been done to death; and I'm happy to shut up and support; no hard feelings toward the player at all; it's the coaches who are yet to convince me (on far more than just this decision)
RAEBURN SHIELD
DanWiley
So no different to any other topic then?
Well actually I do think that there is a slight difference.
The subject has been done to death so many times"
Sorry, the difference is...
Seriously that was with tongue in cheek. However, the fact that he has been re-elected, despite it being done to death, is my point. The discussions we have on here are of little consequence so the fact he's been elected again and it is done deal really shouldn't have a bearing, it is exactly the same as every other topic which we have no influence over.
I agree it has been done to death, but others do want to talk about it, so let them. I think the comments designed to move on from a subject actually often have the opposite effect of entrenching both the view and the need to express it.
Starting pack of
James
Webber
Wilson
Day
Attwood
Garvey
Louw
Houston
Averaging nearly 18 1/2 stone
Also Fa'osiliva not listed as a forward or a back, perhaps they are undecided!
Quote:CoochieCoo
When all is said and done the fact that Hoops appears to be the players' choice then that is good enough for me.
I agree CC,he's the man.
I will support the 'new and revitalised' team and its captain to the hilt as I have done for this my 30th season as a member, but cannot see how anyone can put Hoops on form and on playing ability above Atters, Day, Caldwell or even Spencer (at the end of last term). IMHO his leadership skills when things were going badly were non existent at times and we cannot afford to carry anyone up front, even in our beefed up pack! He may be Club Captain but should not take to the field leading the team, unless he can prove he is worth a starting place.
C'mon Bath we have got to perform this season and need to hit the ground running.
