BOYS FROM THE BLACK STUFF: LONDON IRISH v BATH
Hatley: work
By P G Tips
December 17 2019
The black stuff will be flowing when Bath visit London Irish on resumption of the premiership this weekend. The pre poured Guinness will stand three rows deep on the bar ready for half time and the final whistle. Win, lose or draw the craic is always lively at Irish whose fans will be confident their early season form predicts a successful Premiership season. Bath, in contrast look out of sorts after five straight defeats. They will be desperate for their form, and luck, to turn.
London Irish have been in decline for ten years, falling to the Premiership basement, or exile in the Championship. This year though, they return to the top flight determined not only to stay, but also make a mark. They have recruited not only hard-nosed veterans but big names, such as O’Brien, Ioane, Naholo, Phipps and Jackson. So far this season they have beaten Wasps and Leicester, pushed (an admittedly depleted) Saracens and drawn with second placed Bristol. Seeing Bath’s injury list and the way their defence was torn apart by Clermont last Sunday, they will surely be confident of victory?
Danger men in green could be, the two South Africans Botha and Van Der Merwe, Fainga’a plus the evergreen Kiwi Blair Cowan up front. Behind the scrum they have fielded two playmakers at 10 & 15 –Myler taking the fly half slot and Jackson operating from full back. Naholo is a brute of a wing and, if fit, Phipps will offer an experienced head and sniping threat at scrum half.
Shipping 6 tries before half time in Clermont, and 8 in all is hardly ideal preparation for Bath. Even their lineout, a strength to date this season and source of 3 of their tries let them down- it was a profitable source of possession for Les Jaunes in the first half. There will be much for Luke Charteris to work on, so too for Neal Hatley who must not only prepare a potent pack but also patch a leaky defence. Above all though, it is attack, especially through the backs, which has disappointed most in this premiership campaign. Predictable moves and side-to-side passing simply invite defences to halt Bath’s momentum on or behind the gainline. Fans are desperate to see the fruits of Girvan Dempsey’s input.
Licking their Clermont wounds, Bath will be hoping for good news on the injury front. Hopefully Francois Louw will be fit and we should see the return of Obano, Stuart, Joseph and Rokodoguni. Whoever takes the field, Bath must find not only determination, but inspiration and penetration, or it will be the men in green, not Blue, Black and White enjoying the black stuff in celebration after the final whistle.
“Boys from the Black Stuff” also refers to a TV drama of the eighties about a gang of tarmac layers. Fans of the show will remember “Yosser” Hughes, desperate for work, pleading with the foreman: “Giz a job! I can do that! Go on, giz a job! Gizzit! Gizzit!” Bath fans have reached a similar point of desperation. “Go on” they will be feeling this Sunday “Gizzit! Gizza win! Go on, gizzit!”
Possible Teams:
Bath:
Obano, Dunn, Stuart, McNally, Stooke , Ellis (Capt.), Underhill, Williams. Chudley, Priestland. Brew, Roberts, Joseph, Rokodoguni. Burns
Replacements: Boyce, Walker, Judge, Douglas, Bayliss. Cook, Wright, Hamer-Webb.
London Irish: Hobbs-Awoyemi, Fainga'a, Hoskins, Botha, Van der Merwe (capt), Rogerson, Cowan, Tuisue. Phipps, Myler. Rona, Hepetema, Stephenson, Naholo.Jackson
Replacements: Matu'u, Elrington, Chawatama, Coleman, Mafi, Ioane, Phipps, Parton.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2019:12:24:14:41:16 by P G Tips.
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]

Adopted Player 2018/19 Ross Batty
Adopted Player 2019/20 Jack Davies
Adopted Player 2020/21 Cam Redpath
Adopted Player 2021/22 Darren Atkins
Adopted Player 2022/23 Gabriel Hamer-Webb
Adopted Player 2023/24 Tom Carr-Smith
Adopted Player 2024/25 Max Ojomoh
"AN OUNCE OF ACTION IS WORTH A TON OF THEORY"
FRIEDRICH ENGELS
Stooke, McNally and Williams if selected provide some serious ball carrying. One of the criticisms I heard in commentary at the weekend was that our carries were too predictable with no options so the tackle choice was obvious. A simple fix you would have thought.
I've no idea what we will do in the backs. I guess its the same as the backs themselves.

[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Guess TF will play the week before the 6N starts.
Some criticise the basics, some the backs alignment, some want offloads back on the menu, some think there is a lack of team spirit and dog.
That's a lot to fix in one week.
I suggest the forwards concentrate on the basics and the backs should be working on how to make best use of any space with FB involved on how he wants the ball and where everyone lines up outside.
If there has been plain speaking then the players should be involved in driving the changes.
Quote:B4thB4ck
What would we be focussing on in training if we were in charge?
Good question that.
the basics - I thought we had improved our basic ball retention - ie not dropping simple passes, and not losing it on the floor, but this reappeared with a vengeance in the first half against Clermont. If we can't get these basics right, then everything else is irrelevant. If i were the head coach, i'd be inclined to say to the players - 'you are professional rugby players. I'm not going to insult you by practising catching. Don't insult us by dropping it.'
the backs alignment - I think the outside backs need to genuinely believe they are going to get the ball in order to run really good lines. Why would you bust your lungs to realign, cut angles, 'mean it', when you know full well it's: RP>JR>bosh>go to floor ???
offloads - all about confidence and freedom to make what Sam Vesty calls 'good mistakes'. I don't believe our players have the confidence or are granted that freedom. As an encapsulation of this attitude - Burns 'try' against Toulouse. Rather than watching the brilliant angle he ran, and his role in creating and (all but) finishing that try, they have decided never to trust him again because of a freak moment.
team spirit and dog - i don't see any lack of this. A lack of confidence maybe, but no lack of effort.
I'd add:
- varying the kicking game. Using it as an attacking weapon
- working on putting Roko in 1-1 situations in their 22, not just hoping he'll create Under-12 tries from 60 metres out
- using JJ as a second receiver, and using Roberts more as a 'back row' type of attacker wider out
- rather than letting the second last man - usually JJ - die with the ball (meaning our wingers simply end up as breakdown support), give the wings a go on the outside and/or encourage them to switch back on the scissors
We need this degree of creative thinking.
HOP

Quote:shipwrecked
Oh dear.....Sid, its not a real dog!
Shame, I'd have lent my dog to cause. Whippet/collie cross. Greased lightening speed with 24/7 battery of the collie. Had to have lengthy rehab after leg fracture so fits the club culture but now fully fit, raring to go and only needs a blue top to complement the black n white
But you're right Opti - adopt the famous mantra of the Art of World Class Basics
(now expects someone to post an animals XV....)
Quote:B4thB4ck
Come on Sid, we can't have a Catt and a Dog in the same team.
(now expects someone to post an animals XV....)
Japan have already done that at the RWC!
Oddly they don't have an animal at 10, its the only human.


I guess ours would a (W)Hooper swan - quiet on the surface but hopefully a lot of paddling going on that we don't see...
Quote:B4thB4ck
What would we be focussing on in training if we were in charge?
Some criticise the basics, some the backs alignment, some want offloads back on the menu, some think there is a lack of team spirit and dog.
That's a lot to fix in one week.
I suggest the forwards concentrate on the basics and the backs should be working on how to make best use of any space with FB involved on how he wants the ball and where everyone lines up outside.
If there has been plain speaking then the players should be involved in driving the changes.
Far too much wrong for a few stiff words to fix in a week.
Backs: make them watch some videos of Bath games and then get them out on the field doing running / passing drills and learning a few set moves off first and second phase - like the ones that Exe found successful against us.
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Quote:B4thB4ck
But what would WE do in training this week, if coaching the team, to win the next game.
Given that there's no chance of building an effective attack in a week, I'd concentrate on defensive systems to stop LI scoring tries and also work on limiting penalties in danger areas.
Quote:warrenball
Why not Burns and Priestland at 10/12 for starters
We are very short of centre options, but I think that would be a disaster. Play one of them at 15 if need be. Would honestly rather see Tom deGlanville given a go at 12.
Quote:OutsideBathQuote:B4thB4ck
But what would WE do in training this week, if coaching the team, to win the next game.
Given that there's no chance of building an effective attack in a week, I'd concentrate on defensive systems to stop LI scoring tries and also work on limiting penalties in danger areas.
It does sound like a tall order but if you must have watched games where a replacement 10 comes on who commits defenders and passes late. That can change the threat significantly with the same players outside him. You have to start somewhere and that should not be rocket science for an attack coach.
Quote:B4thB4ckQuote:OutsideBathQuote:B4thB4ck
But what would WE do in training this week, if coaching the team, to win the next game.
Given that there's no chance of building an effective attack in a week, I'd concentrate on defensive systems to stop LI scoring tries and also work on limiting penalties in danger areas.
It does sound like a tall order but if you must have watched games where a replacement 10 comes on who commits defenders and passes late. That can change the threat significantly with the same players outside him. You have to start somewhere and that should not be rocket science for an attack coach.
I agree, but our "attack" coach hasn't shown any signs of being able to get our backs scoring tries. It's good fun for us to speculate on what we'd do, but I really can't see our coaching team changing anything as they seem to think we're not far off.
The real concern for me is our injury list has negated the advantage we would have had over LI and now it's just a simple contest between DOR's for superiority on the day and that doesn't bode well for Bath.
Very good did you apply for DOR job?
I would have Burns practice his chipping so he or someone on our team could catch the ball.
Also offloads, again and again and again.
There is no plan B so FB will likely sit on the bench until the game is lost.
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]

Adopted Player 2018/19 Ross Batty
Adopted Player 2019/20 Jack Davies
Adopted Player 2020/21 Cam Redpath
Adopted Player 2021/22 Darren Atkins
Adopted Player 2022/23 Gabriel Hamer-Webb
Adopted Player 2023/24 Tom Carr-Smith
Adopted Player 2024/25 Max Ojomoh
"AN OUNCE OF ACTION IS WORTH A TON OF THEORY"
FRIEDRICH ENGELS
Quote:Old Bath Tub
Sir for Irish - Karl Dickson, didn’t do us many favours v Saracens ! IMO.
If memory serves, we didn't deserve any. He's a good ref.
... IMHO, of course.
Now in Honolulu
Quote:
Yes, looks so simple. Not entirely true that Bath aren't referenced - it shows how our defence were torn a new one by Clermont.
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Quote:
Nice spot Opti, reminded me that in order to do the overlap it has to be taken to the line. This is probably why we don't see it too often at Bath as Rhys Priestland plays so deep at 10.

Quote:
Nice spot.
Bath don't feature because they don't play rugby in the way the author wanted to illustrate. We seem to play all our rugby behind the gain line allowing defences to move up and drift across cutting off all the options for the wide players. When we do take the ball to the line and use it, rather than smash into the line, we create space. What we then lack is support players running the right lines.
Quote:redmixQuote:
Nice spot.
Bath don't feature because they don't play rugby in the way the author wanted to illustrate. We seem to play all our rugby behind the gain line allowing defences to move up and drift across cutting off all the options for the wide players. When we do take the ball to the line and use it, rather than smash into the line, we create space. What we then lack is support players running the right lines.
Agreed it is almost like we are so busy defending that we forget about attack. We need to get from the trying not to lose mindset to the trying to win mindset. Yes I know that isn’t like flicking a switch because so many factors play in what happens on the pitch. The confidence to run the attacking lines they undoubtedly practice in training just isn’t there at the moment. Maybe the patient play In the right areas of the pitch pragmatic style needs a tweak.
Just hope some of the injuries have cleared up and we get a bit of a boost because this is a must win!
Quote:joethefanaticQuote:Old Bath Tub
Sir for Irish - Karl Dickson, didn’t do us many favours v Saracens ! IMO.
If memory serves, we didn't deserve any. He's a good ref.
Joe
You are right - we did not deserve favours. However, a couple of weeks earlier, Tony Spreadbury had told the BRSC meeting that there would be a clampdown on offside in the Premiership this season.
I saw no evidence of that being applied in the Saracens match and they undoubtedly gained from his laxity.
PG
Quote:TG Kesmo
[
Maybe the patient play In the right areas of the pitch pragmatic style needs a tweak.
Perhaps that is exactly where the "confidence to run the attacking lines" should be developed? Instead of the now rather predictable pick & drives which take 15 phases to produce a score- and exhaustion!
PG
Quote:P G TipsQuote:joethefanaticQuote:Old Bath Tub
Sir for Irish - Karl Dickson, didn’t do us many favours v Saracens ! IMO.
If memory serves, we didn't deserve any. He's a good ref.
Joe
You are right - we did not deserve favours. However, a couple of weeks earlier, Tony Spreadbury had told the BRSC meeting that there would be a clampdown on offside in the Premiership this season.
I saw no evidence of that being applied in the Saracens match and they undoubtedly gained from his laxity.
PG
Have there been any matches where offside has been clamped down on? Even if Sarries had been penalised in our match I'm not convinced we would have won anyway.
PG
Quote:P G Tips
No we wouldn't OB- but after an announced clampdown Dickson's casual management of offside was more notable than most. In a competition where it has been the norm for years, that stands out.
PG
I've watched a few non Bath PL games this season and don't recall any ref clamping down on offside. Could argue that the touch judge should really be spotting offside and alerting the ref, but the standard of touch judge seems to be very poor this season.
I do recall watching a champions cup game where the ref penalised both sides early on for offside and that was good to see.
Don't see Dickson as one of the worst ref's, although in the Sarries game I do recall thinking he really didn't like how our pack scrummaged. That doesn't bode too well for Sunday as it must be difficult for ref's to forget when they've penalised sides in previous games.
15. Tom Homer
14. Semesa Rokoduguni
13. Jonathan Joseph
12. Jamie Roberts
11. Anthony Watson
10. Rhys Priestland (C)
9. Will Chudley
1. Beno Obano
2. Tom Dunn
3. Will Stuart
4. Josh McNally
5. Elliott Stooke
6. Tom Ellis
7. Sam Underhill
8. Josh Bayliss
Replacements
16. Jack Walker
17. Lewis Boyce
18. Christian Judge
19. Matt Garvey
20. Rhys Davies
21. Chris Cook
22. Freddie Burns
23. Aled Brew
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2019:12:20:11:59:36 by BathMatt53.
15. Paddy Jackson
14. Curtis Rona
13. Tom Stephenson
12. Terrence Hepetema
11. Ollie Hassell-Collins
10. Stephen Myler
9. Ben Meehan
1. Danny Hobbs-Awoyemi
2. Saia Fainga’a
3. Olle Hoskins
4. Ruan Botha
5. Adam Coleman
6. Steve Mafi
7. Blair Cowan
8. Albert Tuisue
Replacements: 16. Motu Matu’u, 17. Allan Dell, 18, Lovejoy Chawatama, 19. Franco van der Merwe, 20. Matt Rogerson, 21. Nick Phipps, 22. Tom Fowlie, 23. James Stokes
Phipps on the bench and no Waisake Naholo is handy.
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2019:12:20:12:03:20 by BathMatt53.
Good to see Watson back earlier than feared.
Wonder when we will see Ewels and Louw?
PG
Quote:P G Tips
Thanks Matt
Good to see Watson back earlier than feared.
Wonder when we will see Ewels and Louw?
PG
Agreed it's good to see AW back, but surprised to see him on the wing as he won't get the ball to have any impact on the game. At least at FB he'd get the ball occasionally.
Quote:Bath Hammer
I’m not up on the LI team. Is that considered to be a strong line up & who are the main threats?
Irish fan here - the pack is basically full strength. Strong set of second rows and Tuisue is developing into a good ball carrier at 8 (although a little raw).
In the backs we are light in the back three, missing our two best wingers (Loader and Naholo) and so are going with a youngster and Rona (who has looked better at 13). We had hopes of either Parton or Veitokani breaking through at 15, but both have looked a bit frail so Jackson is playing there for the time being.
However, given injuries and lack of availability, it is a strong side and fans are fairly confident of a good performance.
I cant say I'm hopeful as Bath have made me doubt the little belief I had left. we appear to be a collection of players rather than a coherent team with a coherent plan.
COYB!
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Quote:Bath Hammer
I’m not up on the LI team. Is that considered to be a strong line up & who are the main threats?
Our pack is very strong, with 1 & 7 the only two positions I'd say that you have the upper hand in (although Cowan has been amazing this year). Botha and Coleman are both very strong and very mobile players, while Tuisue is a ridiculously strong wrecking ball and DHA/Hoskins are very fit props.
Our backs are substantially more fragile with Loader and Naholo (two of the best wingers in the Prem) unavailable, causing us to shuffle everything about. You're pretty clearly substantially better in the back four (11, 13-15), and both times the ball gets past the Priestland-Roberts black hole I'd expect you to find a bit of space.
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]

Adopted Player 2018/19 Ross Batty
Adopted Player 2019/20 Jack Davies
Adopted Player 2020/21 Cam Redpath
Adopted Player 2021/22 Darren Atkins
Adopted Player 2022/23 Gabriel Hamer-Webb
Adopted Player 2023/24 Tom Carr-Smith
Adopted Player 2024/25 Max Ojomoh
"AN OUNCE OF ACTION IS WORTH A TON OF THEORY"
FRIEDRICH ENGELS
Quote:bardofavon
hardly an english player in the exiles run on 15. pretty disgraceful really. this is what happens when you have a non english DOR.
Very subtle, great work. Would've been far too obvious to point out Bath's abject failure to develop their own talent and reliance on plundering other clubs (primarily Irish), lovely ironic twist you've given it.
Quote:BardofAvon
hardly an english player in the exiles run on 15
Traditionally, they're an Exiles team and should really comprise mostly Irish players. Still, it's been a long time since Londons Welsh, Irish, Scottish, French, etc were true Exiles teams.
Quote:bardofavon
hardly an english player in the exiles run on 15. pretty disgraceful really. this is what happens when you have a non english DOR. it's true that blackadder stuck with mostly english players, though i suspect that was more because craig wouldnt let him buy any southern hemp ones.
Well there is at least one Irishman !

Adopted Player 2018/19 Ross Batty
Adopted Player 2019/20 Jack Davies
Adopted Player 2020/21 Cam Redpath
Adopted Player 2021/22 Darren Atkins
Adopted Player 2022/23 Gabriel Hamer-Webb
Adopted Player 2023/24 Tom Carr-Smith
Adopted Player 2024/25 Max Ojomoh
"AN OUNCE OF ACTION IS WORTH A TON OF THEORY"
FRIEDRICH ENGELS
Quote:bardofavon
hardly an english player in the exiles run on 15. pretty disgraceful really. this is what happens when you have a non english DOR. it's true that blackadder stuck with mostly english players, though i suspect that was more because craig wouldnt let him buy any southern hemp ones.
4, 5, 11, 13, 15. That's a 1/3rd of the team who are EQP LI developed players.
Quote:bardofavon
hardly an english player in the exiles run on 15. pretty disgraceful really. this is what happens when you have a non english DOR. it's true that blackadder stuck with mostly english players, though i suspect that was more because craig wouldnt let him buy any southern hemp ones.
It is a disgrace having just 7 EQP in the starting 15, we'd probably have a few more but injuries are a pain. On the plus side we do have half a dozen lads from our academy playing, sadly most of them are on your teamsheet.
Quote:bardofavon
hardly an english player in the exiles run on 15. pretty disgraceful really. this is what happens when you have a non english DOR. it's true that blackadder stuck with mostly english players, though i suspect that was more because craig wouldnt let him buy any southern hemp ones.
Really poorly thought through post.
Quote:ExiledChameleonQuote:bardofavon
hardly an english player in the exiles run on 15. pretty disgraceful really. this is what happens when you have a non english DOR. it's true that blackadder stuck with mostly english players, though i suspect that was more because craig wouldnt let him buy any southern hemp ones.
4, 5, 11, 13, 15. That's a 1/3rd of the team who are EQP LI developed players.
Elliott Stooke is a bit of a squeeze isn't it? He played for Irish on loan about 5 times!
Still, I suspect that the initial post was a tongue in cheek fishing trip, which appears to have worked.
Good luck for Sunday - hoping for an entertaining game.
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Quote:BathMatt53Quote:ExiledChameleonQuote:bardofavon
hardly an english player in the exiles run on 15. pretty disgraceful really. this is what happens when you have a non english DOR. it's true that blackadder stuck with mostly english players, though i suspect that was more because craig wouldnt let him buy any southern hemp ones.
4, 5, 11, 13, 15. That's a 1/3rd of the team who are EQP LI developed players.
Elliott Stooke is a bit of a squeeze isn't it? He played for Irish on loan about 5 times!
Still, I suspect that the initial post was a tongue in cheek fishing trip, which appears to have worked.
Good luck for Sunday - hoping for an entertaining game.
When winding up my Bath supporting friend I always include Stooke, but its very tongue in cheek. I wouldn't really include McNally as a LI developed player either as he only really played a season for us given his terrible medical problem.
But what is this name all about for a front row: Lovejoy Chawatama
If he's got the ball what do you call for a pass outside?
Quote:ExiledChameleonQuote:Bath Hammer
I’m not up on the LI team. Is that considered to be a strong line up & who are the main threats?
Our pack is very strong, with 1 & 7 the only two positions I'd say that you have the upper hand in
.
Clearly Exiled Chameleon thinks differently.
Quote:Optimist
Luvvie?
Like that one Opti but how does the ref use that if he wants to have a word with him about something. As in ..
You must push straighter, Luvvie? or You've slipped your binding Luvvie?
Quote:gaz59
We should have the edge on the front 5 but they do have a very experienced back row. They probably have edge from the bench so if we play well it should be a very good, close game
But what is this name all about for a front row: Lovejoy Chawatama
If he's got the ball what do you call for a pass outside?
LJ
Personally I think today is about our state of mind and the whether the team truly believe and have confidence in the game plan and direction Hoops wishes the team to go in.
I reckon Bruce will leave it 2 games at most and if we lose both I fear Hoops at least will be gone especially with Tigers showing real signs of improvement in terms of attitude, defence, belief and most importantly attack in that fist half they looked as threatening as any team this season,.
We have the team out today to-do a job and although nervous I am looking forward to the journey to Irish, I just hope I am still smiling on the way back.
Come on Bath.
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Adopted players: 24/25 J Bayliss; [24] O Lawrence; [23] J Cokanasiga; [22] M Green; [21] A Watson; [20] T Faletau; [19] M V Vuuren; [18] T Faletau; [17] D Denton; [16] H. Agulla; [15] L Houston; [14] W Spencer; [13] F. Louw
Family . Community . Nation - [sdp.org.uk]
My mind's been going places without me lately - Bushfire The B52's
[rd.premiershiprugby.com]
About 3000 against Quins, 3500 against Sale, 5000 vs Tigers.
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Quote:BathMatt53
If this is to be believed then they have lowest attendance in the league and by match is is horrific.
[rd.premiershiprugby.com]
About 3000 against Quins, 3500 against Sale, 5000 vs Tigers.
Today should be higher than that. It’a hard to get people to separate with hundreds for what was likely to be a season getting slapped about before being relegated, especially given that we’re moving to somewhere else next year, which cut crowds in half more or less overnight.
Adopted Player 2018/19 Ross Batty
Adopted Player 2019/20 Jack Davies
Adopted Player 2020/21 Cam Redpath
Adopted Player 2021/22 Darren Atkins
Adopted Player 2022/23 Gabriel Hamer-Webb
Adopted Player 2023/24 Tom Carr-Smith
Adopted Player 2024/25 Max Ojomoh
"AN OUNCE OF ACTION IS WORTH A TON OF THEORY"
FRIEDRICH ENGELS
Adopted Player 2018/19 Ross Batty
Adopted Player 2019/20 Jack Davies
Adopted Player 2020/21 Cam Redpath
Adopted Player 2021/22 Darren Atkins
Adopted Player 2022/23 Gabriel Hamer-Webb
Adopted Player 2023/24 Tom Carr-Smith
Adopted Player 2024/25 Max Ojomoh
"AN OUNCE OF ACTION IS WORTH A TON OF THEORY"
FRIEDRICH ENGELS
Adopted Player 2018/19 Ross Batty
Adopted Player 2019/20 Jack Davies
Adopted Player 2020/21 Cam Redpath
Adopted Player 2021/22 Darren Atkins
Adopted Player 2022/23 Gabriel Hamer-Webb
Adopted Player 2023/24 Tom Carr-Smith
Adopted Player 2024/25 Max Ojomoh
"AN OUNCE OF ACTION IS WORTH A TON OF THEORY"
FRIEDRICH ENGELS
Adopted Player 2018/19 Ross Batty
Adopted Player 2019/20 Jack Davies
Adopted Player 2020/21 Cam Redpath
Adopted Player 2021/22 Darren Atkins
Adopted Player 2022/23 Gabriel Hamer-Webb
Adopted Player 2023/24 Tom Carr-Smith
Adopted Player 2024/25 Max Ojomoh
"AN OUNCE OF ACTION IS WORTH A TON OF THEORY"
FRIEDRICH ENGELS
Adopted Player 2018/19 Ross Batty
Adopted Player 2019/20 Jack Davies
Adopted Player 2020/21 Cam Redpath
Adopted Player 2021/22 Darren Atkins
Adopted Player 2022/23 Gabriel Hamer-Webb
Adopted Player 2023/24 Tom Carr-Smith
Adopted Player 2024/25 Max Ojomoh
"AN OUNCE OF ACTION IS WORTH A TON OF THEORY"
FRIEDRICH ENGELS
Adopted Player 2018/19 Ross Batty
Adopted Player 2019/20 Jack Davies
Adopted Player 2020/21 Cam Redpath
Adopted Player 2021/22 Darren Atkins
Adopted Player 2022/23 Gabriel Hamer-Webb
Adopted Player 2023/24 Tom Carr-Smith
Adopted Player 2024/25 Max Ojomoh
"AN OUNCE OF ACTION IS WORTH A TON OF THEORY"
FRIEDRICH ENGELS
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Adopted Player 2018/19 Ross Batty
Adopted Player 2019/20 Jack Davies
Adopted Player 2020/21 Cam Redpath
Adopted Player 2021/22 Darren Atkins
Adopted Player 2022/23 Gabriel Hamer-Webb
Adopted Player 2023/24 Tom Carr-Smith
Adopted Player 2024/25 Max Ojomoh
"AN OUNCE OF ACTION IS WORTH A TON OF THEORY"
FRIEDRICH ENGELS

Adopted player
2023/24 Tom de Glanville
2021/22 Danny Cipriani
2020/21: Jonathan Joseph
2019/20: Tom Ellis
Adopted Player 2018/19 Ross Batty
Adopted Player 2019/20 Jack Davies
Adopted Player 2020/21 Cam Redpath
Adopted Player 2021/22 Darren Atkins
Adopted Player 2022/23 Gabriel Hamer-Webb
Adopted Player 2023/24 Tom Carr-Smith
Adopted Player 2024/25 Max Ojomoh
"AN OUNCE OF ACTION IS WORTH A TON OF THEORY"
FRIEDRICH ENGELS
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Adopted Player 2018/19 Ross Batty
Adopted Player 2019/20 Jack Davies
Adopted Player 2020/21 Cam Redpath
Adopted Player 2021/22 Darren Atkins
Adopted Player 2022/23 Gabriel Hamer-Webb
Adopted Player 2023/24 Tom Carr-Smith
Adopted Player 2024/25 Max Ojomoh
"AN OUNCE OF ACTION IS WORTH A TON OF THEORY"
FRIEDRICH ENGELS
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Adopted Player 2018/19 Ross Batty
Adopted Player 2019/20 Jack Davies
Adopted Player 2020/21 Cam Redpath
Adopted Player 2021/22 Darren Atkins
Adopted Player 2022/23 Gabriel Hamer-Webb
Adopted Player 2023/24 Tom Carr-Smith
Adopted Player 2024/25 Max Ojomoh
"AN OUNCE OF ACTION IS WORTH A TON OF THEORY"
FRIEDRICH ENGELS

Adopted Player 2018/19 Ross Batty
Adopted Player 2019/20 Jack Davies
Adopted Player 2020/21 Cam Redpath
Adopted Player 2021/22 Darren Atkins
Adopted Player 2022/23 Gabriel Hamer-Webb
Adopted Player 2023/24 Tom Carr-Smith
Adopted Player 2024/25 Max Ojomoh
"AN OUNCE OF ACTION IS WORTH A TON OF THEORY"
FRIEDRICH ENGELS

Quote:recman
It has to be said that we have really, really laboured to get the ball over the line today, when we were in range. That worries me a little.
Having said that they were patient and didn’t lose possession. What was more interesting was that they actually chose to spread it through the backs instead of battering away and scored. First half display was much improved second not so but there were many disruptions due to Hias injuries and substitutions. The game seemed to become really scrappy later on but we were out of site by then.
Well done Bath. Enjoy Christmas and come back ready to do the same to Sale!
P G Tips
Jaco Coetzee: my adopted Player, 2023-24.
McNallys best game for us.
Why can’t we play like this every week? Probably because the opposition were rather ordinary, Cowan aside. Still a good set of results for us this weekend. Need to do same next week.
Quote:ExiledChameleonQuote:Bath Hammer
I’m not up on the LI team. Is that considered to be a strong line up & who are the main threats?
Our pack is very strong, with 1 & 7 the only two positions I'd say that you have the upper hand in (although Cowan has been amazing this year).
I did think that this was an optimistic LI view...turns out it definitely was. The Bath front row did the same as they have been doing all year. Great performance.
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Quote:OutsideBath
What injuries did we get?
See:
[www.somersetlive.co.uk]
Roberts, Stooke, Watson all seemed to pick up knocks.
Not sure how serious.
PG

[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Still, a weekend of 5 points for 1st team, a United win and U18s beating Sarries just means we’ll carry on arguing whether it’s signs of a strong foundation and a bright future, or more evidence of inconsistency.
I haven't seen the game yet but the key will be, are we improving? That is all that counts at this time. Looking forward to seeing the recording.
The first half was very good, and I am not too bothered about the second as the game was won.
You can only beat the team in front of you, but that Irish performance was probably the worst I have seen in the premiership since London welsh's season.
Next week will be a lot tougher. Hopefully we will have a few more players back for then, and can string some wins together.
You do have to question WHY it has taken til the end of December to show any attacking prowess.
Going to be a happy Christmas now..
Quote:Bath Hammer
That was a convincing team performance with not just wholehearted effort but also good application throughout the team. We can only beat the team in front of us & to gain a bonus point win away from home is never easy to achieve so credit to all involved. However , despite a spirited start to the season LI are a limited team & particularly so when missing some of their top players so let’s not get too carried away. As has been said, the important thing is to follow this up with a home win against a much stronger side next weekend.
Agree BH they were really terrible - worst team Bath have played for a long time. Great for Bath to jump above them and would be awesome if they continue to play so poorly for the rest of the season as it will mean that we don’t have to worry. Sale played well and will be a level above what they faced today.
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
... IMHO, of course.
Now in Honolulu
... IMHO, of course.
Now in Honolulu
We were lethal in pouncing on their mistakes and our dominant pack produced quick ball. RP fits the 10 man game but isn't the spark that gets our backs going.
Don't really care though can't get any more points than 5.

Quote:joethefanatic
I seem to detect an echoing absence of negativity on this thread. How refreshing.
Hooper is terrible, Bruce is a hamster and Tarquin smells of elderberries. Slippers...spa...accountant...blah etc.
Happy?
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Quote:BathMatt53Quote:joethefanatic
I seem to detect an echoing absence of negativity on this thread. How refreshing.
Hooper is terrible, Bruce is a hamster and Tarquin smells of elderberries. Slippers...spa...accountant...blah etc.
Happy?
I can tell your heart's not in it, BM, but thank you for trying.
... IMHO, of course.
Now in Honolulu
Obano and Dunn superb. McNally awesome and delivered his best BB&W (/yellow) game yet. The back row tireless and Bayliss was close to my MotM, making 20/20 tackles. Chudley and Priestland shaped and controlled the back 4 (inc JJ) were so dangerous.
Sure, they weren’t great but, as Clermont did to us last week, we made them seem very ordinary.
Onto Sale. Massive home game. Can’t get too excited after one good win but really looking forward to it now.
I've always liked LI since the days they played by Kempton Park so can't echo your sentiments bm53, particularly as it's very hard to compete in the Prem as a newly promoted side. I'm desperately hoping that they stay up and are able to play Prem rugby in their first season in their new stadium. I don't think we'll be relegated-we have these doomsayers every season--but think it would be good for the league if a 'big name' went down. If that's us, so be it.
Quote:ExiledChameleonQuote:BathMatt53
If this is to be believed then they have lowest attendance in the league and by match is is horrific.
[rd.premiershiprugby.com]
About 3000 against Quins, 3500 against Sale, 5000 vs Tigers.
Today should be higher than that. It’a hard to get people to separate with hundreds for what was likely to be a season getting slapped about before being relegated, especially given that we’re moving to somewhere else next year, which cut crowds in half more or less overnight.
Official attendance announced as c9,260, it certainly looked a good crowd and felt like it with the noise around us. Great day out...
Adopted players: 24/25 J Bayliss; [24] O Lawrence; [23] J Cokanasiga; [22] M Green; [21] A Watson; [20] T Faletau; [19] M V Vuuren; [18] T Faletau; [17] D Denton; [16] H. Agulla; [15] L Houston; [14] W Spencer; [13] F. Louw
Family . Community . Nation - [sdp.org.uk]
My mind's been going places without me lately - Bushfire The B52's
I've always liked LI since the days they played by Kempton Park so can't echo your sentiments bm53, particularly as it's very hard to compete in the Prem as a newly promoted side. I'm desperately hoping that they stay up and are able to play Prem rugby in their first season in their new stadium. I don't think we'll be relegated-we have these doomsayers every season--but think it would be good for the league if a 'big name' went down. If that's us, so be it.[/quote]
If you are ‘desperately hoping‘ that LI stay up but are nonchalant about Bath going down, isn’t that slightly odd as a Bath fan?
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Quote:joethefanatic
Yes, Irish did not play well but they were 4 points ahead of us in the table at start of play so let's not get entitled just yet. How about after we've won back to back Prems? I'd accept some arrogance then.
I was not intending to be arrogant, far from it. I just reflected what I saw like many have about Bath this season. I actually have a lot of time for LI & feel embarrassed that we have poached so many of their best players, several of whom had a big impact on today’s outcome. Considering the difficulties they have faced they deserve great credit. I do feel, though, that unless today’s performance was just a blip, if they suffer the sort of player loss that we have suffered in recent years they will do well to survive but I really hope they do, though not at our expense!
Quote:Beergoggles
Well that’s Christmas ruined. The only thing those true BBW fans on this site can be miserable about now is the thought of Hooper whistling jingle bells with a spring in his step. Add in a post Christmas thumping of Sale and those true BBW fans will be inconsolable. I feel for those true BBW fans in these days devoid of gloom and despondency. I really do.
There’s actually only 2 or 3 who meet that description Beergoggles unless you include those, including me, who voice any criticism whatsoever! It’s just that those comparatively few posts rather stand out.
Quote:Bath HammerQuote:joethefanatic
Yes, Irish did not play well but they were 4 points ahead of us in the table at start of play so let's not get entitled just yet. How about after we've won back to back Prems? I'd accept some arrogance then.
I was not intending to be arrogant, far from it. I just reflected what I saw like many have about Bath this season. I actually have a lot of time for LI & feel embarrassed that we have poached so many of their best players, several of whom had a big impact on today’s outcome. Considering the difficulties they have faced they deserve great credit. I do feel, though, that unless today’s performance was just a blip, if they suffer the sort of player loss that we have suffered in recent years they will do well to survive but I really hope they do, though not at our expense!
Hi BH, my comment was not aimed at you (or anyone else), it was intended as an observation on our tendency as supporters to swing to extremes depending on whether we've won or lost
I was also pointing out that LI have been a better team overall than us so far this season.
Happy holidays (and after today, they will be)
... IMHO, of course.
Now in Honolulu
Quote:ballsout
Very strong Bath team, much stronger than I expected. No excuses...
For those waiting for bo, the above is his regular strategy - it means his view is validated whatever the result. He'll be along to tell us that beating LI is meaningless unless it's followed up by several consistent performances (and he'll be absolutely right in that respect).
Quote:joethefanatic
I seem to detect an echoing absence of negativity on this thread. How refreshing.
The sole purpose of sport is to win and preferably hammer the opposition in the process, therefore it’s not possible to be negative after yesterday’s result.
Quote:OutsideBathQuote:joethefanatic
I seem to detect an echoing absence of negativity on this thread. How refreshing.
The sole purpose of sport is to win and preferably hammer the opposition in the process, therefore it’s not possible to be negative after yesterday’s result.
But yet they persist.
... IMHO, of course.
Now in Honolulu
otherwise you wouldn’t get 40,000 people running the London marathon.[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Quote:BathMatt53
Of course it’s not the sole purpose of sport (think we have disagreed on this before Ootherwise you wouldn’t get 40,000 people running the London marathon.
Apologies, I really should have added IMO.
I'm still glowing after the win so clearly got over excited with my typing..

Quote:Bath HammerQuote:Beergoggles
Well that’s Christmas ruined. The only thing those true BBW fans on this site can be miserable about now is the thought of Hooper whistling jingle bells with a spring in his step. Add in a post Christmas thumping of Sale and those true BBW fans will be inconsolable. I feel for those true BBW fans in these days devoid of gloom and despondency. I really do.
There’s actually only 2 or 3 who meet that description Beergoggles unless you include those, including me, who voice any criticism whatsoever! It’s just that those comparatively few posts rather stand out.
I think the doom and gloom merchants know who they are Bath Hammer. Agree there are only a couple of voices but boy are they loud .. and repetetive ... over and over and over again.
Quote:CoochieCoo
Best attacking display of the season
A bit OTT to describe Priestland's game management as "world class". He was very good indeed but let's keep some perspective
Also, great congrats to Tom H on his MotM - an excellent performance, and far more inspiring than any of my old lessons at school on your Greek namesake!
Merry Christmas all!
A few thoughts:- the Ellis pass for the Chudley try did look forward, some good dummy lines run by our backs, for Underhill's 'silly' penalty I think he was first man in from Bath so no ruck formed(?), was Mylers cross kick touched in flight hence falling well short? It had an odd trajectory, irrelevant maybe but just being fair to him if it was.
It's a bit late in his career for Chudley to change but if he could cut out the little skip before passing out from the ruck that would be a simple improvement (a la Peter Stringer).
Great to see some offloads, built on confidence in the scoreboard.
We didn’t box kick at all in the first half, this showed. Have confidence to run and it will pay off.
Irish were poor in attack. Never had any creativity.
A good surface makes a hell of a difference. The Rec does not help us play to our strengths.
Also, running out of Guinness with 30 minutes to go. WTF?!?
This is London IRISH! That’s like us running out of Thatchers at the Rec.
All in all a good day out. Also, free dodgems. Brilliant.
J
Quote:gaz59Quote:CoochieCoo
Best attacking display of the season
A bit OTT to describe Priestland's game management as "world class". He was very good indeed but let's keep some perspective
I've still only watched highlights of the first half, but as far as i could tell most of our tries actually owed more to our 'defence' than to attacking with ball in hand. Nothing wrong with that at all. But it was a day on which everything went right for us (and god knows, we are owed a few of those), including key opposition players missing compounded by extremely disruptive and early in-match injuries, kind bounces of the ball, and those refereeing decisions that always go your way when you are physically dominant.
Hooper and the players' confidence will benefit hugely from us being removed from the relegation chat and scoring some tries, but dishing out 8s and 9s out of 10 to players for a 20-minute purple patch was a bit over-excited.
I’m not sure that Homer could have done any more - he did his job, made his tackles and catches and made loads of breaks and ran loads of metres.
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Quote:BathMatt53
Think you are being a bit harsh Opti! They played really well (against limited opponents) in the first half. Then the subs were made early in the second and that disrupted things quite a bit. If I have a concern is that there appears to be quite a drop off from the 1st front row (which is brilliant) to the replacements.
I’m not sure that Homer could have done any more - he did his job, made his tackles and catches and made loads of breaks and ran loads of metres.
The disruption of losing Nathan Catt and Henry Thomas for basically the entire season likely hasn't helped here. I presume at the start of the season we would have been looking at both of those guys starting a good number of games.
Not meant as any kind of sleight to messrs Boyce and Judge, but being able to bring on two hugely experienced campaigners like those after 60 minutes would be a different story. Contrast it with last weekend over in Clermont where you look over at their bench with 20 minutes to go and see a guy like Rabah Slimani stretching out and popping his gum shield in. *gulp*
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]

Quote:BathMatt53
Spot on Barnoid.
Yep completely agree. Most frustrating thing about the stupid binning was it bringing back stuart into the fray when he should have been in cotton wool. V reliant on him and beno now
Quote:shipwrecked
Remember Todd's attack when they have the ball, that was Sunday. Defence was very much our attacking weapon, aided by Stephen Myler's plimsols of course.
I went to the Eddie Jones talk at Christ Church on Julian Road last month (I believe there was a second session the following day). There was, unsurprisingly, a discussion regarding the World Cup Final, what the game plan was and more generally how do you beat the South Africans.
As part of this Eddie asked the question: what is the best indicator for the winner of a rugby game? Suggestions from the audience included percentage possession, metres carried, clean breaks, etc. along with the usual wag suggesting points on the board.
Eddie's answer, and I assume it was backed by statistics, is that the best indicator is the team which kicks most is the winning team. Clearly the kicking has to be accurate, but the way to win a game of rugby is to give the ball to the opposition under pressure and in an area of the pitch that they don't want to play, and then hit them hard. So good tackling wins matches not just because the opposition don't score, but you do when you regather following the tackle or from the dash to the ball bobbling in space.
Possibly a bit depressing as we, I imagine, like to see the flowing three quarter moves and dynamic pick-and-goes from the forwards.
I didn't see the London Irish came, so only caught up on replay later, but I think all of Bath's tries stemmed from kicks of some description. On the other hand I did see the United game the previous day and Max Ojomoh's try from first phase (lineout) ball was the highlight for me.
It's easy to see how a DoR, possibly under pressure for results, might come up with a game plan to kick the leather off the ball (like Jack Charlton's Irish soccer team) at all opportunities. I'm thinking more Gary Gold here than either Backadder or Hooper.
If Hooper can turn our pack into a dominant force the rest of the tactics, with possession, become a lot easier. Execution is still required but at least there are options for 8/9/10/12 to choose from.
I would rather have a game plan where we make the right attack/kick decisions dependent on what's on the field in front of you rather than because it's pre-planned that you always attack from your own 10m. But whatever the game plan is it will only work if people know their roles and are comfortable with them. That takes time.
Yes we got humped by Clermont and Sarries and that sucks. Is our scrum looking better than last year? Yes. Is our lineout looking better than last year? Yes. Are our possession stats better, our ball retention? Yes. Small steps. Further to go. But a start.
Quote:hasta
Yes we got humped by Clermont and Sarries and that sucks. Is our scrum looking better than last year? Yes. Is our lineout looking better than last year? Yes. Are our possession stats better, our ball retention? Yes. Small steps. Further to go. But a start.
Yes, Hasta small steps, the maul needs fine tuning and pod formation near the line is good but it needs to happen faster. Pack is looking much better which was always part of the plan.

Eddie's answer, and I assume it was backed by statistics, is that the best indicator is the team which kicks most is the winning team. Clearly the kicking has to be accurate, but the way to win a game of rugby is to give the ball to the opposition under pressure and in an area of the pitch that they don't want to play, and then hit them hard. So good tackling wins matches not just because the opposition don't score, but you do when you regather following the tackle or from the dash to the ball bobbling in space.
.[/quote]
'Clearly the kicking has to be accurate, '
therein lies the key - plus a strong follow up.
Adopted player 2019/20 Will Chudley. Weird split household co-parented
player 2020 Josh Matavesi
