TIME FOR TRIES? BATH v HARLEQUINS
Faletau: push on
By P G Tips
January 7 2020
The road to recovery can begin in unexpected places and Friday’s Harlequins match could be one for Bath. Not for a European recovery – the match is a dead rubber as neither side can qualify from the group- but hopefully the recovery of a try scoring habit. Only one other Premiership club has scored fewer tries than Bath this season, a failing needing urgent correction ahead of key Premiership clashes against Tigers, Warriors and Quins themselves. Friday’s match up is a chance to do just that.
Bath’s inability to score from 70% possession in the first half at Kingsholm last Saturday paved the way for the collapse of the second half. Indeed it was attacking ball lost deep in Gloucester territory that gifted the first two tries. Pressure, possession, territorial dominance and sequenced patterns of play are only a means to an end and must result in precise finishing.
Both clubs, with eyes on the mid table Premiership scrap will want to make changes – to rest some key players, bring others back into the fold and reward squad men pushing for a starting place. It is anybody’s guess who Harlequins will select but they can call on a good mix of experience and youthful promise. If, for instance they choose to rest Danny Care, Landajo can fit smoothly into his position. Chisholm has deputised ably for Brown and Kyle Sinckler will want to prove his fitness ahead of the 6 Nations. Possibly the most exciting mix of old hand and young tyro could be a power and pace contrast on the wings in Goneva and Ibitoye.
Stuart Hooper has spoken of ringing the changes for this match. “There will be some people playing who have not had as much rugby as they would have liked so it is an opportunity for them to play”, an opportunity for us to develop and push on with the areas of our game we feel need a bit of work.”
Jack Walker’s struggles at the lineout in the second half suggest a return for Ross Batty, Jamie Roberts could do with a break and Levi Douglas’ excellent form for United deserves reward. This could be just the match too for Ruaridh McConnochie to show that his elevation to the World Cup squad was not an aberration. If fit he could stand in for Tom Homer who is undergoing HIA protocols. A repeat of last Saturday’s back row is possible also, to help them gel as a trio for the Leicester and Worcester matches to come.
There were encouraging developments in Bath’s festive victories over London Irish and Sale but Gloucester exposed faults that could undermine confidence if not rectified quickly. They unpicked the previously reliable lineout and exposed their visitors at ruck and on the counter. Most disturbing though was the lack of cutting edge close to the opposition line. Bath do have it in them to score tries, as shown at London Irish and against top teams like Exeter and Northampton. Hamer-Webb’s effort against Ulster was a beauty, but all too rare for Bath in this competition. With both Leicester and Wasps rediscovering their mojo and the whitewash last weekend, Bath seem late to the party. Any later and they risk being dragged into a relegation dogfight.
Two weeks ago the Rec crowd was a raucous and potent sixteenth man for Bath in a gutsy win over Sale. The same crowd can equally be silent and cynical, as frustrated as a bench player awaiting a call that never comes. This Friday the crowd need to get involved. The players need to throw off the shackles, give it a lash and invite their supporters to believe in them. Tries should be the aim, tries the focus, tries the outcome.
Possible Bath Team:
Boyce, Batty, Judge, McNally, Douglas, Louw (Capt.), Underhill, Faletau. Fox, Burns. Brew, Willison, Wright, Rokodoguni. McConnochie
Replacements:
Vaughan, Walker, Nixon, Stooke, Bayliss. Cook, Priestland, Davies .
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2020:01:14:18:26:17 by P G Tips.
Referee: Pascal Gaüzère (France)
Assistant referees: Maxime Chalon (France), Julien Dufort (France)
Television match official: Éric Gauzins (France)
Timekeeper: Paul Box (England)
Citing commissioner: John Montgomery (Scotland)
... IMHO, of course.
Now in Honolulu
Quote:joethefanatic
I see the weather forecast for Saturday is for strong wind and rain. Can I respectfully suggest that the ball does not go beyond 10? Running the ball is all very well but there are certain eternal verities in rugby...
Hopefully it’s better Friday night when the games on !

Adopted Player 2018/19 Ross Batty
Adopted Player 2019/20 Jack Davies
Adopted Player 2020/21 Cam Redpath
Adopted Player 2021/22 Darren Atkins
Adopted Player 2022/23 Gabriel Hamer-Webb
Adopted Player 2023/24 Tom Carr-Smith
Adopted Player 2024/25 Max Ojomoh
"AN OUNCE OF ACTION IS WORTH A TON OF THEORY"
FRIEDRICH ENGELS
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
PG
Adopted players: 24/25 J Bayliss; [24] O Lawrence; [23] J Cokanasiga; [22] M Green; [21] A Watson; [20] T Faletau; [19] M V Vuuren; [18] T Faletau; [17] D Denton; [16] H. Agulla; [15] L Houston; [14] W Spencer; [13] F. Louw
Family . Community . Nation - [sdp.org.uk]
My mind's been going places without me lately - Bushfire The B52's
I was saying that this game is essentially going to be the 'United' game. Neither team will be risking key players. It's actually a bit of a shame that we can't register TdG for example. Would be a great hit-out for him and a couple of others.
PG
They could do with another game together as a unit and then give them the week off next week.
You learn so much as a unit by playing together.
Burns at fly half for next two weeks and then Rhys back for league game.
BATH RUGBY SIDE TO FACE HARLEQUINS:
15. Anthony Watson (C)
14. Gabe Hamer-Webb
13. Max Wright
12. Jackson Willison
11. Aled Brew
10. Freddie Burns
9. Max Green
1. Lewis Boyce
2. Jack Walker
3. Christian Judge
4. Matt Garvey
5. Rhys Davies
6. Tom Ellis
7. Mike Williams
8. Josh Bayliss
Replacements
16. Ross Batty, 17. Lucas Noguera, 18. Sam Nixon, 19. Levi Douglas, 20. Nahum Merigan, 21. Ollie Fox. 22. Alex Davies, 23. Tom de Glanville
PG
Several of those named are not listed as registered for the ECC so EPC website is obviously out of date.
No matter - good to see some youngsters get a run out - thought Green looked good last time out, Tom de Glanville too.
P G Tips
Jaco Coetzee: my adopted Player, 2023-24.
Harlequins team news
15 Aaron Morris,
14 Vereniki Goneva
13 Luke Northmore
12 Paul Lasike
11 Gabriel Ibitoye
10 Brett Herron
9 Danny Care
1 Joe Marler
2 Max Crumpton
3 Kyle Sinckler
4 Tevita Cavubati
5 Dino Lamb
6 James Chisholm
7 Chris Robshaw (C)
8 Alex Dombrandt
Replacements: 16 Jack Musk, 17 Santiago Garcia Botta, 18 Will Collier, 19 Glen Young, 20 Semi Kunatani, 21 Niall Saunders, 22 Tom Penny, 23 Ross Chisholm.
P G Tips
Jaco Coetzee: my adopted Player, 2023-24.
bo- Because he's our 3rd/4th choice loosehead and Obano deserves a week off? Who else do you recommend in his place?
PG
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Quote:P G Tips
Except England guys Opti- Eddie has called a Pre 6N camp for that weekend. See MtT's Chron thread.
PG
Oh. From a result point of view that probably hinders them more than us. From a season-ticket holder/paying public point of view that is absolute garbage.
Adopted players: 24/25 J Bayliss; [24] O Lawrence; [23] J Cokanasiga; [22] M Green; [21] A Watson; [20] T Faletau; [19] M V Vuuren; [18] T Faletau; [17] D Denton; [16] H. Agulla; [15] L Houston; [14] W Spencer; [13] F. Louw
Family . Community . Nation - [sdp.org.uk]
My mind's been going places without me lately - Bushfire The B52's
Quote:dr.bath1865
bo- Because he's our 3rd/4th choice loosehead and Obano deserves a week off? Who else do you recommend in his place?
Vaughan. Bath born and bred, wants to play for the club and isn't one of the worst signings we've made in a decade, with one of the costliest contracts?
Quote:ballsout
Noguera reserve loosehead. Seriously? Why??
Seriously...why not? Surely he hasn't fallen so far that he isn't even worth playing for 20 mins in a dead rubber game?
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Our back row still decent but agree the scrum may struggle.
Where is Levis Davies? Is he injured? He looked a real handful early season.
I had no idea Noguera was on such a big contract. Sounds like he should free up a bit of cap!
Quote:dr.bath1865
Agree but I thought he picked up a knock in the last Utd game at Irish.
I had no idea Noguera was on such a big contract. Sounds like he should free up a bit of cap!
He had 40 front row Argentina caps before he joined Bath at the age of 24, I would have thought that he would have (quite rightly) commended a very decent salary at the time. He always looked a bit lightweight for Premiership rugby whenever I have seen him play. Lovely guy though.
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Anyway, scrum will be under pressure, we'll be starved of possession, our already non-existent team cohesion will be made even worse by 14 changes. When we finally get some ball to play with, Freddie will kick it away instantly, badly, probably costing us a try at the other end shortly after, as usual. Hey ho. We'll score a few individual tries though, surely, so that'll be something to cheer.
Quote:ballsout
Lovely guy, total waste of time to play him.
Anyway, scrum will be under pressure, we'll be starved of possession, our already non-existent team cohesion will be made even worse by 14 changes. When we finally get some ball to play with, Freddie will kick it away instantly, badly, probably costing us a try at the other end shortly after, as usual. Hey ho. We'll score a few individual tries though, surely, so that'll be something to cheer.
Happy New Year, bo! Good to see some things never change.
Great to see Max Green back.
I like BO wonder why we keep Noguerra who has achieved absolutely nothing with us after coming here with an excellent international track record. Much rather we gave the experience and game time to Vaughan if fit.
Similarly Garvey is going to have to step up, and again I would have played Douglas in his place.
Quins by a lot.
Adopted player 2020/21 Beno 'the Transformer' Obano
Adopted player 2019/20 Jonathan 'JJ' Joseph.The Jink Joseph.
Adopted player 2018/19 Adopted player 2018/19 Semesa 'The Rock' Rokoduguni
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2020:01:09:13:54:08 by Bathovalballer.
[www.epcrugby.com]
3. ELIGIBILITY OF PLAYERS
3.1 Each club must nominate a squad of up to 41 players. A minimum of 10 of the players nominated by the club must be capable of playing in front row forward positions. All such players must, on registration, be fully and properly registered with their club and Union.
3.2 A club must nominate a squad of between 19 and 23 players for each match.
3.3 A minimum of six front row players must be included in each match squad such that on the first occasion that a replacement is required in each position, a replacement can be made. Where uncontested scrums are ordered due to the departure of a front row player and there is no suitable replacement, the player whose departure caused the uncontested scrums may not be replaced (i.e. the club will be required to play with 14 players).
3.4 In order to reduce the possibility of uncontested scrums, each club may also nominate further front row players, referred to as Emergency Front Row players, who may be registered with EPCR on a match-by-match basis provided that all necessary details of the players have been submitted before 12 noon (GMT) on 24 October 2019. The provision for the nomination of Emergency Front Row players is not intended to allow clubs to improve the quality of their squads, and is designed to cater for illness and/or injury in the relevant positions. The players added to squads will typically come from a club’s academy or similar.
3.5 To provide flexibility for clubs in light of Rugby World Cup 2019 and to cater for the possibility of long-term injuries sustained by players after the First Registration deadline but before Round 1, clubs may register up to five Swap Players on or before Wednesday 13 November 2019 to replace players previously registered by the club.
3.6 The registration of incoming Swap Players can be reversed before the deadline of midday (GMT) on Thursday 26 March 2020. Each player can only replace the player who was initially nominated as his Swap Player.
3.7 Each club may register up to five Additional Players during the pool stage, but none during the knockout stage, each to replace a player previously registered. A minimum of three Additional Players must be front row players, one Additional Player can be from any position and one Additional Player must be a medical replacement. Additional Players must have a three-month contract with the club and must not have played for another club in the tournament. Additional Player registrations must be submitted by 12 noon (GMT) on the Wednesday before the match. De-registered players may be re-registered (in place of the relevant Additional Players) during the pool stage.
3.8 For Second Registration, clubs can add up to three players to supplement their squads and one of the players must be a front row player. Such registrations must be submitted by 12 noon (GMT) on 26 March 2020.
3.9 Each club is permitted a maximum of two ‘non-European players’ in each match squad and for the 2019/20 season at least, a player who is a UK citizen will be regarded as a European player.
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Dempsey has to be heavily scrutinised and if the attack is blunt again like it has been all season surely he has to be moved on?
Quote:OutsideBath
Dempsey has to be heavily scrutinised and if the attack is blunt again like it has been all season surely he has to be moved on?
Really? Why is this meaningless match suddenly pivotal rather than any of the others?
... IMHO, of course.
Now in Honolulu
Quote:joethefanaticQuote:OutsideBath
Dempsey has to be heavily scrutinised and if the attack is blunt again like it has been all season surely he has to be moved on?
Really? Why is this meaningless match suddenly pivotal rather than any of the others?
Because our attack has been so blunt all season that we might as well not fielded any wingers.
As this is a dead runner there’s no excuse not to chuck the ball around and demonstrate we actually have wingers.
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
When pulling on the shirt they know this is a good chance to show what they can do rather than 5 or 10 mins at the back end of a game.
There, that's my team talk done. Not great I know....
*AW aside.
Quote:ballsout
Noguera reserve loosehead. Seriously? Why??
If they had beno in squad and he got injured i am sure you would have some things to say. Assume you would rather see vaughan on the bench? I wouldnt argue with that. Assume nogeura is off and better to invest playing time in a young guy who will be around next season?
Quote:BathMatt53
Boyce has something to prove against his old club - he was pinged off the park in the last game against Quins and the commentary team suggested that Adam Jones knew all of his weaknesses in the scrum and so got the TH (not Sinkler) to target them. Will be a long evening if he hasn’t sorted that.
Agree he has lots to prove. So far has looked weak at set piece and a liability in terms of discipline. Tbf is stil young and looks a handful when carrying. Hopefully hatley has something to work with....
A. Finally got round to watching GP highlights last night, gawd Quins looked desperate!
So guess this is their way of trying to get a bit of confidence back.
Come on you Bath Boys, time to give em a good smacking. Bath by 12.
FLAP
Quote:warrenball
Surprised to see the bookies have the game fairly even with a very slight advantage to Quins. Am I being particularly pessimistic about Bath's chances in thinking they are being generous in those odds to Quins?
They have multiple seasoned internationals including world cup finalists. I saw the 1 point swing and thought it unusual too, even with my rosiest of tinted glasses on.
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Marler
Walker
Sinckler
[2nd row - absolutely no idea - assume 1 each]
Robshaw
Dombrandt
Ellis
Care
Burns
Lasike
Willison
Goneva
Brew
Watson
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
14 v 12
Shame about Green but Fox looking decent.
COYB!!!
Adopted players: 24/25 J Bayliss; [24] O Lawrence; [23] J Cokanasiga; [22] M Green; [21] A Watson; [20] T Faletau; [19] M V Vuuren; [18] T Faletau; [17] D Denton; [16] H. Agulla; [15] L Houston; [14] W Spencer; [13] F. Louw
Family . Community . Nation - [sdp.org.uk]
My mind's been going places without me lately - Bushfire The B52's
This french ref is excellent.
19-22
Adopted players: 24/25 J Bayliss; [24] O Lawrence; [23] J Cokanasiga; [22] M Green; [21] A Watson; [20] T Faletau; [19] M V Vuuren; [18] T Faletau; [17] D Denton; [16] H. Agulla; [15] L Houston; [14] W Spencer; [13] F. Louw
Family . Community . Nation - [sdp.org.uk]
My mind's been going places without me lately - Bushfire The B52's
Some real bonuses though - Willison looked sharp and some smart plays. Thought Green started really well, real shame he had to go off and hope he's back soon but then Fox looked good too. Some nice touched from TDG too and Hamer-Webb took his try well. Only blot (other than the loss of course) was Watson going off injured - early hoping it's nothing serious - did any see what happened?
Hope Ant is ok. Max Green looked like something pinged which is a shame as it was nice to see an actual break from 9.
Willison looked good.
Hope Hooper keeps a similar team for next week.
Quote:Kidney Stone
Agree BHF. Real positives were Jackson Willison’s return, and a great show from Fox and Gabe. Nixon was solid when he came on and the best I have seen the Boyce Judge combo.
Hope Hooper keeps a similar team for next week.
Agreed totally. Willison a breath of fresh air. Decent result that from such a lot of changes. Fun to watch.
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
We were never in that. Regardless of our fourteen screw ups in the last five minutes.
Yet another team utterly schools us in attack, at home.
Lucky Quins didn’t play their first team or we’d have been humiliated.
Quote:ballsout
Such a weak club.
We were never in that. Regardless of our fourteen screw ups in the last five minutes.
Yet another team utterly schools us in attack, at home.
Hogwash. We were both winning at half time and also had 68%. To say that we were ‘never in that’ is ridiculous. Also that the team who scored 3 tries ‘schooled’ the one who scored 4, 2 of which were from the backs. Yes they were better and more experienced in the end but it was hardly a hammering.
(Nice and quick on the forum after a loss though, that’s a surprise)
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
So we lost again.
Half time ok and then disintegration.
This has just got to be half-time lack of tearing strips of them, pointing out errors, kicking up backsides etc.
Just like at Glaws. Time for whoever is detailed to stop worrying about what the boss says and get on with it.
Quote:BathMatt53Quote:ballsout
Such a weak club.
We were never in that. Regardless of our fourteen screw ups in the last five minutes.
Yet another team utterly schools us in attack, at home.
Hogwash. We were both winning at half time and also had 68%. To say that we were ‘never in that’ is ridiculous. Also that the team who scored 3 tries ‘schooled’ the one who scored 4, 2 of which were from the backs. Yes they were better and more experienced in the end but it was hardly a hammering.
(Nice and quick on the forum after a loss though, that’s a surprise)
Once again we offered nothing in the second half. It was just blunder after blunder when we had the ball. You’re deluding yourself if you think the sides performed to the same standard.
As for your cheap shot, I didn’t bother posting after another team, this time Gloucester, schooled us 4 tries to zero last week. I won’t post much anymore about this one. I’m past caring tbh. Hopefully more losses will finally pish some long overdue change at this club. Certainly hoping we don’t sneak into the top 6 on the last day of the season and offer f all in the big boys cup the following year.
Fact is, that’s now the worst European run in the club’s history. Great job Bath.
Anyone remember the last time we put a big score on another team and thrashed someone. Or put in an amazing performance to be proud of? Me neither.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2020:01:10:22:49:26 by ballsout.
Quote:Hasta
Jesus Christ, Ross Batty.
Not on that showing he isn't.
Shame about the injuries - Green looked like ankle / Achilles to me and the poor lad was understandably devastated.
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Quote:Bath Hammer
So, West Ham score a goal in the last seconds to gain an invaluable point but have it ruled out by VAR for an utterly ridiculous hand-ball. On top of that Bath loose - again - & then I hear that our one first team player who turned out tonight limped off & is doubtful for the 6 Nations & more importantly for Bath. On top of that we lose a scrum half who was playing well & could have replaced Cooke going forward. Can things get worse!
Eeyore continues to post?!!
Came away feeling good and very hopeful for the future. Many of the youngsters put in a good shift, esp. Bayliss, Fox and Hammer-Webb. Shame our line out fell apart, possibly Batty's throwing, in second half, as we could have nicked it at the death. Mind you if we had kicked all of the penalties instead of hoping to score from a driven line out, we would have won!
Young Max Green looked sharp and was very upset at the end and walking on crutches. Great shame as he had started so well.
Although we lost with a little more accuracy and being able to tackle Dombrant, we could and should have won that. At least we were in the hunt which is not always the case in recent years.
Adopted player 2020/21 Beno 'the Transformer' Obano
Adopted player 2019/20 Jonathan 'JJ' Joseph.The Jink Joseph.
Adopted player 2018/19 Adopted player 2018/19 Semesa 'The Rock' Rokoduguni
Adopted player 2020/21 Beno 'the Transformer' Obano
Adopted player 2019/20 Jonathan 'JJ' Joseph.The Jink Joseph.
Adopted player 2018/19 Adopted player 2018/19 Semesa 'The Rock' Rokoduguni
Quote:bathstigg
Batty couldn't hit a barn door and Burns can't kick to touch. Utter@#$%&i think thats 6 concecutive Euro defeats on the bounce. Fed up of the lame excuses.
I’m sure our luck will change away to Ulster.
J
I also couldn't decide if the ref was excellent or terrible, it was such a shock to see lineout throws pinged so often ( correctly) that it just confused me !
Also , how frustrating is Freddie Burns? Moments of class followed by really silly errors.
Quote:Big Chief Little Chief
As a neutral, I'd be far more upset if I was a Quins fan. That was a international front row which only achieved parity with a second choice Bath one. To me, Quins look like all is not well. They could well be in trouble come the end of the season.
We’ve lost to them twice so far therefore we are just as likely to be in trouble I fear.
I also couldn't decide if the ref was excellent or terrible, it was such a shock to see lineout throws pinged so often ( correctly) that it just confused me !
Also , how frustrating is Freddie Burns? Moments of class followed by really silly errors
Just so. Surely he wasn’t as erratic at Gloucester & Leicester? He offers something in attack but is too unreliable otherwise..
Edited 4 time(s). Last edit at 2020:01:11:01:17:27 by Bath Hammer.
I liked the look of TDG very much. I'd start him at 10 against Ulster. The idea of Fred there fills me with dread and playing him won't tell us anything we don't already know.
Hope Ant's OK.
And a recurring observation. The TV commentary team were an absolute disgrace. You'd never have known there was another team on the pitch other than Quins. It's high time we stopped ex-players commentating on their old teams. It brings nothing but bias.
... IMHO, of course.
Now in Honolulu
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]

Yet again the attack was toothless, slow and lacking any form of coordination. The players looked utterly confused when the got the ball so just ran into the nearest defender.
When is Dempsey going to add any sort of value to the coaching setup? Our wingers must be bored rigid.
Willison looked good and it will be nice to see him in the first team but I expect Hooper to revert to Priestland and keeping things tight for the rest of the season, unfortunately.
Kay made exactly the same point that we have been screaming about. In matches teams will get Half-break opportunities. Where Sarries, Saints etc will make the most of the defensive chaos and keep it loose (and capitalise as often as not) Bath often - in fact nearly always - panic, take it to ground, ruck etc which allows the defence to get back into shape. I don’t have the stats but we must be one of the teams who create fewest offloads in the prem? Look how well if worked in the first 40 against LI and how it just didn’t happen in the first 40 against glos, despite all the possession. Willison used to be known as the offload king, put him at 12 and let him get back to that.
Green has some lovely touches in this short time on the pitch IMO - breaks and cute (and quick) handling.
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Our lineout falling apart was very frustrating.
What I'm very happy with is that our second choice front row who got bullied earlier in the season were extremely solid against an international front row and that our back row in Ellis, Bayliss and Williams were seriously competitive against Robshaw, Chisolm and Dombrandt. But.... we still desperately lack the ball-carriers to go with the attacking gameplan we apparently have.
Very pleased with Willison, Fox, TdG, gutted for Green. I assume Ant was taken off as a precaution. But our attack pattern must be adjusted and our defence isn't what it needs to be either.
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Quote:hasta
My frustration is it's another game (particularly in Europe) that we *should* have won. And we didn't win any of them. Which becomes a pattern. If we can start actually winning these games, I'm sure it will become a habit.
Our lineout falling apart was very frustrating.
What I'm very happy with is that our second choice front row who got bullied earlier in the season were extremely solid against an international front row and that our back row in Ellis, Bayliss and Williams were seriously competitive against Robshaw, Chisolm and Dombrandt. But.... we still desperately lack the ball-carriers to go with the attacking gameplan we apparently have.
Very pleased with Willison, Fox, TdG, gutted for Green. I assume Ant was taken off as a precaution. But our attack pattern must be adjusted and our defence isn't what it needs to be either.
Yes I agree Hasta it is important to string results together as confidence plays a huge part in a successful team but of course other aspects effect the putting out of your strongest team every time. I gather Watson is now a doubt for the start of the six nations!
I am beginning to think that our midfield problem is partly down to pace, TdG and Willison seemed to have zip that JR and RP lack. Freddie did at least run it back at them but did have a few horror moments, the long pass to Watson was painful to watch, and painful for Watson too.

Quote:Long Term
I'm afraid it has to be realised we are at the start of a long process of development( yes again !!).
You are absolutely right, we have clearly gone back to square one. However with the correct coaching/management team in place it doesn’t have to be a long process, Northampton have demonstrated that this season.
Sadly we have chosen the unqualified novice route which is likely to take at least 5 years before we start challenging again, if it actually works at all.
The ref was a bit of a curates egg pulled up some off sides but missed a load of infringements at the breakdown. As a friendly it was quite enjoyable several youngsters had a run out end of move on.
It was good to see Willison playing so well and he must be a better bet than Jamie Roberts for actually creating something in midfield. Roberts is/was a great player but he is very one dimensional and now lacking in pace of any sort. If you just want a bashing tackling centre , then fine, but I hope we are looking for something else.
Hooper takes a lot of unnecessary flak on this board. What is he supposed to say infront of the cameras each game. He has to defend the players that he coaches, he cannot stop dropped passes and crooked throws on the field when no doubt all week in training everything is fine. Just what is he supposed to say. I am sure that as a manager some blunt words are spoken behind closed doors and that is the way it should be.
Most of us want success for the club (perhaps one or two exceptions who would have nothing to moan about) and it is clear the players believe that they are a strong group of players who are moving in the right direction. They know that they are able to play better and are usually the first to accept their mistakes but give them more of a chance to get things right including Hoops.
Europe was effectively over the moment Stockdale intercepted Zach's pass to Roko in Game 1. Certainly by the mud wrestling at The Stoop in Game 2. This was about experience and developing squad both short term and longer. We won't see Anthony again until post 6N, just hope the knock isnt serious for his sake.
Its all about Leicester two weeks today.
Quote:OutsideBathQuote:Long Term
I'm afraid it has to be realised we are at the start of a long process of development( yes again !!).
You are absolutely right, we have clearly gone back to square one. However with the correct coaching/management team in place it doesn’t have to be a long process, Northampton have demonstrated that this season.
Sadly we have chosen the unqualified novice route which is likely to take at least 5 years before we start challenging again, if it actually works at all.
We have tried the overseas coach with a reputation without success, I think we are looking to Exeter as the model to follow , Baxter wasn't an overnight success, throwing money at it leads to a Saracen's situation, no particular coach is guaranteed success(please tell me of one who was available that we didn't consider if you know one) any coaching team has to work with variables that differ from club to club, working with Bruce Craig being a big factor at Bath. I just don't think it's as simple as Hooper bad, so and so guaranteed better.
Quote:Optimist
My joint starting XV has 8 x Quins, 7 x Bath, and i'm going to say we shade the bench, mainly because I haven't heard of most of their players so I haven't got a clue. But it's Marler, Sinckler, Robshaw, Dombrandt and then Care who have the potential to dictate the course of the match.
Marler
Walker
Sinckler
[2nd row - absolutely no idea - assume 1 each]
Robshaw
Dombrandt
Ellis
Care
Burns
Lasike
Willison
Goneva
Brew
Watson
Well on last night's performances I would have just 3 Bath in a joint team with Watson, Hamer-Webb and Willison. Possible case for Walker I guess but that is it
And most disappointing for me was to see Freddie do exactly what he needed to do to not get a contract renewal
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]

Our problem was that Burns had a bit of shocker, for me. He looks short of confidence and game time... because he is short of both. He did 3 brilliant things (the banana kick!) but about 10 very strange things too and I didn’t like his game management. It’s perhaps the fault of the boys outside him, but the number of times he is forced/tries to go on his own and gets turned/chips the ball away is maddening. I get it that he’s frustrated, but for an international 10, I thought he gave us little structure and leadership. Hope I’m not being harsh!
The pitch, the pitch... yes it’s the same for both sides but you just see the likes of Watson and Willison struggling to keep their feet in attack, even in the supposedly good parts of grass. It makes our home matches tough spectacles, IMHO.
Still, it didn’t rain. Some young lads stuck their hand up. Marler proved he’s bit of a fool. And the French ref was excellent. So a mixed bag!
Quote:BathMatt53
Kay made exactly the same point that we have been screaming about. In matches teams will get Half-break opportunities. Where Sarries, Saints etc will make the most of the defensive chaos and keep it loose (and capitalise as often as not) Bath often - in fact nearly always - panic, take it to ground, ruck etc which allows the defence to get back into shape.
There is a pattern of us starting games well and finishing badly when the game is open. It does make me think that the coaching for structured play is working well but as in any match the last 20 mins can be a different game.
It is almost as though we need to practice our play when tired and players are out of position. In training, take the players on a 5k run, then go onto the pitch with everyone out of position or even maybe the back rows removed from play and just chuck the ball at someone to start the game. They would learn to adapt to the lack of structure with unexpected possession and play to the situation. Maybe they do this already?
Clearly the result was not ideal and Watson's knock a concern, but did any who criticised our selection really expect an LBP from the game -or that we would match Quins try for try?
There were some encouraging individual performances and eve, in the first half, signs of cohesion. What was galling was how that cohesion collapsed with lost line outs.
As in other disappointing losses this season, no lack of spirit or effort, but sloppy execution. Fixable, but needing some additional specialist advice perhaps - maybe from a former player or two in a consultancy role?
PG
Should make things interesting, next week.
Quote:Mike the Taxi
I notice Clermont beat Ulster today.
Should make things interesting, next week.
In what way? Clermont will stuff Quins, Ulster will play a full strength team at home against another Bath second team.
Glasgow vs Exe is a good watch.
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2020:01:11:16:01:37 by BathMatt53.
Quote:Long Term
I think we are looking to Exeter as the model to follow.
Agree with you again, we do seem to by trying to copy Exeter. We are certainly as boring to watch as Exeter were a few seasons back.
It did take Baxter time, but he learned his trade in the championship and I think got coaching qualifications. Hooper is winging it in the PL and not bothering with coaching badges.
I might have a little more time for the setup if Hooper admitted he needs an experienced HC to guide him.
At the end of the day my opinion is irrelevant as Hooper is here for the duration, but I believe he will fail and we’ll be back to square one again in 3 years time.
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
They talk of a high performance environment and buzzwords like that, but the foundations are made of sand.
Same old story for the past ten years. Things are “fixable” and “some good individual performances”. Ever since Bruce Caig took over.
I’ll ask again, when was the last time Bath put in an excellent 80 performance and thrashed a team? Feels like years.
(*Not always perfect accuracy mind)
Edit: back to slow ball, that’s the Kahn we know and love.
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2020:01:11:17:45:36 by BathMatt53.
And Scot Heron showed Freddie precisely how to get a backline moving forward fast and into space for their second try last night
What disappoints me so much is that we are not even showing glimpses of this kind of play. I can take losing but when have we scored a try that really got you excited
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
I do think that GD is either struggling to get a pattern or struggling to get the players who can play to a pattern (or struggling to get any kind of pattern on the rec in the state that its currently in only to have to switch styles to play on a dry/plastic pitch in the next week).
Clearly, a good coach would develop a pattern for the players available rather than the other way round. So, I think that he is going to struggle to remain at the club unless he can develop the squad available.
I reckon that next season Hatley will be promoted to Head Coach and GD will either move on, or get some new players to mould into an attacking force.
OBinFiji
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
A decent coach should be able to make something of what we have even if they aren’t PL winning quality.
Quote:OutsideBath
Are there really any 9 or 10’s of the quality we want available?
A decent coach should be able to make something of what we have even if they aren’t PL winning quality.
OB you are massively over reaching with this coaching argument. You know full well you either are a scrumhalf, or a flyhalf or you are not!

Quote:shipwreckedQuote:OutsideBath
Are there really any 9 or 10’s of the quality we want available?
A decent coach should be able to make something of what we have even if they aren’t PL winning quality.
OB you are massively over reaching with this coaching argument. You know full well you either are a scrumhalf, or a flyhalf or you are not!
You’ve lost me with that. Chudley/Cook are scrumhalf’s, FB/RP are flyhalf’s and I’m saying they are good enough to deliver more with better coaching strategies.
Quote:BathMatt53
The Chudley try vs London Irish.
Agree it was pretty good but nowhere near the level of skill and pace in either of those quins or glaws trys
Quote:OutsideBathQuote:shipwreckedQuote:OutsideBath
Are there really any 9 or 10’s of the quality we want available?
A decent coach should be able to make something of what we have even if they aren’t PL winning quality.
OB you are massively over reaching with this coaching argument. You know full well you either are a scrumhalf, or a flyhalf or you are not!
You’ve lost me with that. Chudley/Cook are scrumhalf’s, FB/RP are flyhalf’s and I’m saying they are good enough to deliver more with better coaching strategies.
Why would you think that, if Priestland were 22-24 coaching might influence his style perhaps the ratio of kick to pass but 10's are mostly instinctive.
Take Cook as another example, did he change under Ford, how could coaching improve his game?
Coaching is more applicable to getting players working together as a team rather than than improving individuals particularly away from formative years. We just have to accept that Priestland, Burns, Cook and Chudley are as good as they are going to be. With the exception of Chudley that is, I'm sorry to say, not good enough for future success.

However let’s just agree to disagree on this point. You are happy with the coaching setup and I’m not and I doubt much will change our views either way.
There are a lot of moving parts as we know and that is what makes it such a fascinating sport for me.
I do think we are improving. Apologies for cliched rugby but it starts up front and with results comes confidence followed by tempo followed by expectations for runners that their timing will be matched by a pass.
At present I think we have the foundations for good possession but the tempo is a bit slow and defences are closing gaps in time.
It feels like a jigsaw with some pieces missing, good in some parts but overall not that effective. I think our squad is good enough and can improve once the different facets of the game are better linked.
I don't care how old a 9 and 10 are, they are entirely capable of learning to pass like a Stringer (without pausing) or stand as flat as a Butch James to suck in defenders.
Quote:OutsideBath
I agree with you the 9/10’s we have in the squad aren’t good enough to challenge for top 4, but they are good enough to do something in attack with the right coaching. At present our attack is embarrassingly poor.
However let’s just agree to disagree on this point. You are happy with the coaching setup and I’m not and I doubt much will change our views either way.
Hold on there cowboy, I didn't say I'm happy with the coaching set up!
We need a defence coach, a head coach and the attack needs a shake up. HOWEVER lets get the personnel right first.
All the coaching in the world won't stop Freddies wobbles or make RP into a side stepping 10, they are locked into that.

If you are coming to Belfast next week don't forget to go to the Crown in Great Victoria Street
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Quote:OBinFiji
I
I do think that GD is either struggling to get a pattern or struggling to get the players who can play to a pattern (or struggling to get any kind of pattern on the rec in the state that its currently in only to have to switch styles to play on a dry/plastic pitch in the next week).
Or, in actual fact, the "process" and "systems-based" strategy drawn up by Hooper and Rock they spend so much time talking about have marginalised him to the point where he has no impact.
No foundation to our game/club.
Quote:shipwrecked
Coaching is more applicable to getting players working together as a team rather than than improving individuals particularly away from formative years.
Then our coaching set-up has failed miserably for the past five years, because playing with cohesion and as a team rather than a collection of individuals is pretty much the last thing we've offered in all that time.
But I really hope you don't actually believe what you're saying. How can you say that coaches can't improve players away from their formative years. Come on. It's literally in the name, they're there to coach the players and improve them, years after year, whether they're 18 or 30.
Quote:ballsoutQuote:shipwrecked
Coaching is more applicable to getting players working together as a team rather than than improving individuals particularly away from formative years.
Then our coaching set-up has failed miserably for the past five years, because playing with cohesion and as a team rather than a collection of individuals is pretty much the last thing we've offered in all that time.
But I really hope you don't actually believe what you're saying. How can you say that coaches can't improve players away from their formative years. Come on. It's literally in the name, they're there to coach the players and improve them, years after year, whether they're 18 or 30.
You need to read it in context BO, the point was coaching can improve scrum halves and fly halves, specifically, RP, FB, WC and CC.
With the exception of WC I cant see coaching changing these guys, those positions are instinctive, a sports psychologist perhaps. Sorry their boat has sailed, they've plateaued.
Now if you mean props or hooker or back row that's a different matter.

Otherwise when things start to go pearshaped……………………………………………………………….
Yours in utter desperation having watched firstly Exeter yesterday and then Saints today.
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
It is no coincidence that the two best teams in this regard are Exeter and Saracens and it is why they can rotate their squads or lose players to injury without seeming to lose any momentum. Just look at our fly halfs they play completely different styles of rugby.
Bath, for a long time have seemed to rely on the individual brilliance of certain players, it is why our team is less that the sum of the individuals and why we appear so rudderless at times and so adversely affected when top players get injured.
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
Quote:Bath Hammer
It seems to be the cohesion & fluency of the backs that is the problem. That rests at the door of Jurgen Dempsey.
...so that the problem all along - I though we had signed the guy from Leinster but got his German cousin instead!! (Reminds me of Ali Dia, best football signing ever).
[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]
(It would be nice if there were a better selection of emojis to select from)
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2020:01:13:16:47:15 by Bath Hammer.
