HOME THOUGHTS FROM ABROAD: FOLLOWING BATH’S LATE SEASON FORT
TdG: potential
By PG Tips
October 13 2020
Following your club’s fortunes from a distance can be frustrating, but Bath’s late season resurgence has been exhilarating. For me, tracking results, performance and selection debate from Spain, the thrill of Bath’s late dash for the playoffs was given added spice as I gleaned most of my information from this community. The roller coaster of speculation, anticipation, rising hope and expectation seems to have enlivened the board, brought new contributors, lurkers from the shadows and new friends.
The strongest flavour has been hope. Where in October to March the atmosphere was gloom or frustration, since August the mood has been the most cheerful I can recall since mid 2015. That is not to say this is a board of Pollyanna’s, nor that the optimism has been naïve. Far from it: the cheer has mostly been tinged with a sense of realism, but an overall feeling that things are not only much better now but moving in the right direction is palpable.
Another key change is growing acceptance of and respect for Project Hooper. The appointment of Neal Hatley as Head Coach has much to do with this, bringing in a highly respected figure from our most successful season since 1998 and also offering fans a readily understandable coaching structure. Stuart himself has also been gaining more support, his role in planning and directing the Rugby Department’s efforts now more widely acknowledged. Of course, he still has his detractors, but if Bath can sustain this improvement through next season, they will find themselves very much in the minority.
Many have commented on the emergence of an identifiable style: one that Hooper announced before this season started. He has begun with forward strength, which since the season’s renewal has been the cornerstone of Bath’s successes. Commentators beyond COML have taken notice- on other boards and in the national press. Of course, many would like to see a more expansive style, but at least we now have one. In three years of Blackadder coaching the style seemed to change from month to month, succumbing eventually to a muddle. The expansive side can be bolted on in time ( as Saracens did post 2017 and as Exeter proved by adopting a confrontational driving forward game before re -introducing their original sweeping backs moves). Recruitment has already started to add fluency to midfield attack, and we await news of an additional fly half with growing hope.
Selection debate in the past two months has been great to read. Happily, there is now real competition in most positions and the need to rotate for squad freshness no longer rings alarm bells. The tone of debate is more balanced as a result. The overall improvement seems to have brought the best out of players like Rhys Priestland, who have divided opinion, while the recruitment of the Spencers, Redpath and Matavesi plus the surge in form of Walker, Bayliss, Reid and particularly De Glanville shows the potential of this squad.
The lingering aftertaste to this most enjoyable feast is respect. Not just between members of the COML community, but from visitors to the board (many most complimentary on our performance and approach), DORs and players of rival clubs and commentators in the media. Long may it remain so.
It is too early to make predictions for next season, but the green shoots of hope are definitely there, for both Bath Rugby and COML. From a personal point of view it has been fascinating to follow Bath’s ups and downs through the eyes of posters on here. Many thanks to Mr Frivolous and Shipwrecked for standing in as match previewers and to my fellow mods CoochieCoo and hasta.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.
Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 2020:10:21:11:23:15 by P G Tips.
However, in the same way we accepted that Chudley was doing OK until we saw what Ben Spencer offered I think we will see a similar upgrade in the backs when we get a 10 more suited to unleashing Redpath JJ and our wings.
I do feel that JJ needs a bit of a reboot as well. Or have I got that completely wrong?

Quote:Bath Hammer
The previously somewhat criticised owner & CEO deserve some credit for how the appointment has , so far, turned out & for not slavishly following the type of appointments made by our Premiership rivals.. I also think & have done for some time that the amount of credence that is given to “experience” in many areas of life is somewhat overblown.
Agreed BH. I think eyebrows were raised in similar fashion when Wasps replaced (the highly experienced) Day Young with Lee Blackett - look how that's turned out!
PG
... IMHO, of course.
Now in Honolulu
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2020:10:15:01:25:55 by joethefanatic.
PG

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2020:10:15:08:35:50 by joethefanatic.
Quote:woodpecker
I would like to commend Bruce, partly as he is conspicuous by his apparent absence. He seems to have changed tack, evolution rather than revolution and less churn and it seems to be working. I'm sure Exeter were doing his head in after pi$$ing away millions.
Perhaps when the team starts winning he feels less need to be so 'hands on'.
As others have stated, there have been big improvements since hatley came back. But we are still some way off top 4.
The forwards have done a great job but the backs continue to lag. It is noticeable that although we have scored more tries since lockdown, these have mostly been fat boy tries. Tries from our backs are limited to individual efforts from the likes of Spencer and Mac. We still seem unable to put the ball through the hands in any meaningful way. Our attacks are side to side, predictable and easy to defend. There is no wit or guile in them, no penetration or subtlety. We struggle to open up opposition defences or create overlaps. In the second halves of the sarries and chiefs games we scored a total of 3 points and no tries. A backline containing 6 senior internationals could not cross the chiefs’ whitewash. These are sobering stats. It is hard to think of a team in the prem that has a more toothless backs attack than us.
RP has had probably his best season for Bath- ironic since he was originally shown the door. Rhys is very good at what he does but he is a kicking 10 not a running 10. Good for 9-man rugby but not for bringing his outside backs into the game.
BO has often (very often?) complained about Bath dropping the ball and stuffing up possession, ruining any attacking momentum and yielding promising territory. He is right. It happens all the time. Twice on Saturday Bath dropped the kick off which led, a phase or two later, to tries for Exeter. This happened three or four time this last season. It is a basic skill. Why do the coaches not pick up on it? The nuts and bolts of successful rugby are based round skills like these: avoiding knock ons, giving and taking a pass, creating an overlap, putting someone through a hole and doing it all under pressure. We really struggle to do it.
So in my opinion we need to do three things next season in order to push on. We need another flyhalf as a matter of urgency so we can change the plan mid game if we have to and so that we can give Rhys decent rest time. We also need cover for injury- we were lucky RP got through the last round of games without harm. Matavesi is not the man for the job. He has said he doesn’t want to play 10. Is Bailey old enough and mature enough to step up so soon?
I think we need more resources at 13. JJ is the only on the field who has no one after his shirt. It is not a healthy situation for the club or for the player. JJ has a habit of going missing in games. He may also struggle to hang on to his england shirt this year. We have wright and clark but these guys are little more than journeymen with defensive weaknesses. We need better than them if we are to challenge for the top. We have Butt in the academy but is it too soon for him?
We need a skills coach. We had Matson briefly before he went back to NZ. Before him we had Edwards, who was a bit of a joke and who got his job, one feels, through the old boy Exiles network. Bath always gives the impression that it is not bothered about skills, that skills are low priority. This is why we keep messing up.
And lastly we have Dempsey. He has been bitterly disappointing. I was excited when I first heard of the appointment but he has done nothing in the two years he has been with us. I can’t see any improvement in our attack. It is time to admit that, like Blackadder, Dempsey was the wrong appointment. Dempsey has another year to go I believe. Hooper needs to start looking now for a replacement. The best attack coaches are in NZ or Oz.
Quote:Bath Hammer
I do agree we need to look for a really creative backs coach to take over from Dempsey. I’m puzzled how the Leinster backline thrived under his guidance.
You have to give credit to Stuart Lancaster for a lot of the attacking flair I reckon.
Quote:Bath Hammer
It is true we probably would have ended up 5th if it hadn’t been for COVID but I don’t know how much better those 3 other teams are. Certainly Bristol & Wasps seem to have more effective back lines, although not better players but we may have the edge up front. I doubt if those teams would have failed to score more than 3 points in the 2nd halves against Sarries & Exeter though.
I sort of agree but it was Sarries, last game, wolf pack and all that and Itoje had an absolute stormer but we need some pace and invention at 10. Leinster's fave move was the wrap around and by the time RP gets into position there is cover in place. RP has even found himself in space but can't exploit it. He also lacks the physicality to break tackles in the way that JM does, (who has also lost pace).
TDG has that spark, and Daily isn't slow either but I dot feel a young quick 10 on BS's pass would tear a few holes up the middle that JJ and AW can exploit. When we move it we are just too slow!

It's fairly obvious that Hooper is a methodical, building-blocks kind of bloke, and so attack may be the next piece. But it's frustrating to think that we have great foundations in terms of the forwards, a proven backs coach, international outside backs, and yet we still consistently fail to look like a side that can create space from set pieces, or threaten from turnovers. As I said on another thread, I think it's entirely a mindset thing, rather than skillset. Brian Ashton turned us into a freewheeling attacking side in a couple of weeks after taking over from Connolly (iirc) and i feel entirely sure that he could do the same with this group of players - Priestland included.
I think Priestland has adopted the role of Hooper's man on the pitch. But I don't think for a minute that he couldn't adapt to a different set of instructions.
However he is a very different player to RP. He feels more dynamic and I suspect could easily have played scrumhalf at any time.
Funnily enough I have just googled them and they are about the same weight but RP is 2 inches taller. I honestly thought that JG might have been 5' 8" and RP 6' 2"...............if you know what I mean.
Adopted player for 2020 - 21 Charlie Ewels Captain of Bath FC......The Bournemouth Barnstormer
Only time is going to tell whether the next building block in Hooper's plan is to aim for fluidity in the backs, but we're not going to trouble the elite teams unless we achieve it.
Anybody watch the NZ/Aus game at the weekend. It was pretty helter-skelter at times - lots of knock-ons, but some of the handling and offloading was unbelievable.
Exeter Rob Baxter: DOR, ex club forward with local West Country roots, Tavistock
Bath Stuart Hooper: DOR, ex club forward with local West Country roots, Exeter
Team complement in both Bath and Exeter are often England qualified with local youthful origins.
Both Rob Baxter and Stuart Hooper develop teams based on forward strength with a strong defensive ethos. Back development less of a priority.
Similarities beween Gareth Steenson and Rhys Priestland kicking games with young 10’s in development (Simmonds and Bailey)
Club owners have similar aims and ground development concepts.
On that basis the future of Bath rugby is laid out in Exeter rugby clubs recent history. The good news on that front is that European Championship medals are about 4-5 years away!

Quote:warrenball
Always dangerous following another clubs template, by the time we get there Exeter will have moved on and still be ahead. You also have to be careful for another reason, Exeter could have looked at our success all those years ago and followed our template, where would they be now? You must be constantly inventive to be No 1 as other teams will find ways of negating your style of play, so you have to stay one step in front, not behind the opposition.
+1 to that. That's what Bristol have done.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2020:10:21:10:49:13 by Optimist.
Quote:OptimistQuote:warrenball
Always dangerous following another clubs template, by the time we get there Exeter will have moved on and still be ahead. You also have to be careful for another reason, Exeter could have looked at our success all those years ago and followed our template, where would they be now? You must be constantly inventive to be No 1 as other teams will find ways of negating your style of play, so you have to stay one step in front, not behind the opposition.
+1 to that. That's what Bristol have done.
Two things, one its currently working for Bath second Bristol with Radradra, Piatau, Afoa, Vui, Luatua, Naulago, Adeolokun and Leiua and then the temps Malins and Earl are hardly building a West Country legacy!
I might be old fashioned but I like what Exeter and Bath are doing.

the old school believe that winning is everything but they go back to a time when the game was amateur and was played for the benefit of the participants in front of three men and a dog. today the game is professional, played in front of tens of thousands who all pay A LOT to see it. it cannot be denied that fans are increasingly being short changed by the games they see: less ball in play time, more and more cheating, committee meetings before line outs, the nonsense of the crocodile ruck, omnipresent offsides, cynical moves by the bucketload to prevent the opposition getting an advantage. the result of all this is that most games are not worth watching and in the end the fans will go elsewhere. if clubs don't play more expansively and take their responsibility to entertain more seriously they will be signing their own suicide note. which is why bath really needs to sort out its attacking game.

Quote:bardofavon
it cannot be denied that fans are increasingly being short changed by the games they see: less ball in play time, more and more cheating, committee meetings before line outs, the nonsense of the crocodile ruck, omnipresent offsides, cynical moves by the bucketload to prevent the opposition getting an advantage. the result of all this is that most games are not worth watching and in the end the fans will go elsewhere.
All valid points BoA but while officials remain relaxed about these infringements it would be naive of clubs to ignore them. If you can find a counter to these offences, use it. If not, you get dragged into the prevailing style and adopt the same tactics - nearly all clubs do.
I firmly believe that the "traditional" Bath style is one of invention and attack and I want to see Bath develop both. The ills you name though are those of the game - not one particular club.
PG
a. Ball in play time is higher now than it was 10 years ago
b. Does everyone remember the kick tennis of the late 2000s?
c. Cynical play has *always* existed in rugby
d. I think a lot of people have very rose-tinted glasses about what rugby was like in the 90s.
The best thing about rugby to me is that there are multiple ways to play the game. Chucking it around is fun, but so is brutal carries. It's a complex game that contains multitudes, as do crowds.
No one here denies that Bath need to develop their attacking game further. Yes Exeter are frustratingly inevitable from 10m out, but they can also break the line and offload (see the Hogg and Devoto tries against us for example).
... IMHO, of course.
Now in Honolulu
