Why losing Burch might be a good thing


By Nathan Jackson
May 18 2010

Before I start, please note this ISN'T an anti-Rob Burch article, so if anyone takes it that way then I apologise. With the news that Burch has rejected City's offer of a contract, the goalkeeper looks set to leave Sincil Bank, but it might not necessarily be the worst thing to happen to the club.

Burch has been City's number one since joining in 2008, only missing out on a small handful of games due to an injury sustained at Brentford away in September 2008. Although he got off to a rocky start, he went on to become a hugely popular goalkeeper and the Imps probably would have gone down without him.

His contract is up at the end of June and the club offered him what they have described as "one of the biggest in the club's history." Burch has subsequently rejected this contract with Doncaster one of the favourites to sign him. Although the news about losing Burch is disappointing, financially and budgetly speaking, it's not the worst thing in the world that could have happened.

As the Echo had revealed several weeks ago, Burch is on £1,000 a week on his current deal and let's for argument's sake that he was offered £2,000 a week on his new deal, rejecting that. That means that that we have an extra £2,000 a week on the budget to spend (although many speculate it was considerably more than that). Obviously you have to replace Burch, but you can get plenty of half-decent goalkeepers for a wage similar to what Burch was on.

This would leave £1,000 a week to spend on other players. It could be an extra £1,000 that could persuade Davide Somma to join permanently, or it could be the bit of extra money we need to convince an extra midfielder or two to come in.

As mentioned above, there are plenty of half-decent goalkeepers that are available who we could afford at the same, or even less wages than what Burch is. Kenny Arthur, Joe Anyon, Wayne Brown, Kevin Pilkington, Russell Hoult, Glenn Morris and Stuart Nelson all have experience in this division and are all available on free transfers.

We at theimps.ka would also like to take this opportunity to thank Burch for the last two years and to say he is a properly decent bloke. At Exeter last season he accidentally kicked a ball into my camera and thought he had broke it, so he gave me his training goalkeeper gloves (although they did have his name spelt incorrectly on them).....my camera was fine.

Why losing Burch might be a good thing
Posted by: theimps.ka (IP Logged)
Date: 18/05/2010 13:04

What do you think? You can have your say by posting below.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.

Re: Why losing Burch might be a good thing
Posted by: skeggyimp (IP Logged)
Date: 18/05/2010 15:22

I'm just glad the saga's over, at least now the club can really start looking at other options. However good Burch was did he really have to keep us in limbo for half a season?

Re: Why losing Burch might be a good thing
Posted by: StratfordImp (IP Logged)
Date: 18/05/2010 15:23

Nathan - good post and not taken in a negative way at all. I 100% agree with you, £2k or £2.5k which was mentioned on another post takes a certain chunk of salary that could be better used elsewhere. I would take Pilkington or Brown but having witnessed 2 of Hoult's debuts.....no thanks!!! Especially as Barnet weren't relegated this year!!!

Keith Alexander - LEGEND - Gone but certainly NEVER forgotten.

Re: Why losing Burch might be a good thing
Posted by: Kate Jackson (IP Logged)
Date: 18/05/2010 15:28

One option might be bring in Pilkington and a younger (under 21) goalkeeper. At 36 Pilkington would still have a year or two left in him, and whilst he's playing, he and Musselwhite could help develop the young goalkeeper, therefore having a ready made replacement when Pilkington retired.

Good Luck, Mr Gorsky


http://twitter.com/#!/katejackson84

http://www.katejackson84.blogspot.com

Re: Why losing Burch might be a good thing
Posted by: Helgy. (IP Logged)
Date: 18/05/2010 15:59

Keepers tend to get better with age.

Re: Why losing Burch might be a good thing
Posted by: Red Imp (IP Logged)
Date: 18/05/2010 16:18

His wage is £1k take home i.e. around £1.6k all in.

Re: Why losing Burch might be a good thing
Posted by: 79imp (IP Logged)
Date: 18/05/2010 17:36

Pilkington is a dreadful keeper and would be a huge step back for us. However, I agree that it isn't the end of the world that Burch is leaving, and let's face it, we've had more than half a season to get used to the idea. However, we should not be cutting corners when it comes to finding a replacement. I would personally want us to try and get someone youngish in the Burch mould who has spent time higher up the leagues sitting on the bench and hungry to get 1st team football. We have Musselwhite signed as back-up, and would doubtless get another keeper on loan if our first choice got a long-term injury, and I'd much rather we didn't waste money on 2 average keepers to compete with each other. The importance of a good keeper can not be understated. As was said in the article, Burch quite possibly kept us up and Marriott, also stuck in the reserves before we snapped him up, was responsible for a big chunk of points in his 2002-2006 heyday. And you only have to look higher up the leagues and see that no team is successful with a dodgy keeper, i.e. Almunia at Arsenal.

Re: Why losing Burch might be a good thing
Posted by: davidimp (IP Logged)
Date: 18/05/2010 17:50

Good piece Nathan and very fair.
Anyon could be a possibility.
The lad Leeds released Ankregan could be worth a look.
Good luck to him wherever he goes.
Even if it flipping Coutheh(Sm22)
I wonder if the likelihood of Cotterill going to Coventry will affect that move???

Here we go again!
Will we ever get the right man?

Re: Why losing Burch might be a good thing
Posted by: I Blame Paul Mayo (IP Logged)
Date: 18/05/2010 21:30

Wouldnt mind us bringing in Johnny Brain from Macc.

Re: Why losing Burch might be a good thing
Posted by: cherryexile (IP Logged)
Date: 18/05/2010 21:42

Don't get me wrong, I like and rate Burch, but are we in danger of thinking he was better than he actually was?

There are a lot of ordinary keepers that look good in rubbish teams, but who are found out at a higher level.

The reason is that rubbish teams concede a lot of goals, and are subject to a larger number of shots. This gives the goalkeeper more shots to deal with and therefore more opportunity to make saves. Thus, he has more opportunity to impress.

We are all aware of Burch's long distance vulnerability. In a successful team that may be the only thing he has to deal with during a game, so the cost of the mistake is magnified versus a player who lets in one long range shot and concedes two others due to incompetent defending, where the one mistake is forgiven because of the three other good saves that were made.

I would rather Burch stays than goes, but being the best of a poor team does not make you good in itself.

http://i399.photobucket.com/albums/pp75/Cherryexile/1975.jpg



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2010:05:19:09:13:25 by cherryexile.

Re: Why losing Burch might be a good thing
Posted by: NAPOLImp (IP Logged)
Date: 18/05/2010 21:53

Good article, I always thought John Danby from Chester was a decent keeper.

Re: Why losing Burch might be a good thing
Posted by: skeggyimp (IP Logged)
Date: 19/05/2010 08:25

Well said Cherry good post. The argument for saying Marriot had a better defence in front of him doesant really stand when you consider they were mostly just starting their careers.

Marriot still holds the record for the most clean sheets.

Saying that I do think Burch is an excellant keeper.

Re: Why losing Burch might be a good thing
Posted by: keith47424 - Hinckley Imp (IP Logged)
Date: 19/05/2010 14:27

I agree Cherry. A very poor team with a good keeper.

Cheers Keith47424 - Hinckley Imp
http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c250/keith47424/lincolnsig.gif
theimps.ka Best Newcomer award winner 2007-2008 season.

Re: Why losing Burch might be a good thing
Posted by: Newporter (IP Logged)
Date: 19/05/2010 15:40

Marriot looked to be in good shape at Keith's game.
I'd love to see him back.
Respect to Burchy though, a class act and without him and Somma where would we be?

Re: Why losing Burch might be a good thing
Posted by: sammyimp (IP Logged)
Date: 19/05/2010 17:10

Ah this is the worst day ever sad smiley two very sad people here... i know he deserves to play at a higher level etc, but them cheating TW^Ts... i really hope he has a water tight contract for when things go belly up smiling smiley wish him loads of luck for the future, i'll be following his career winking smiley

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment. We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals. We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards. If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing abuse@sportnetwork.net