Watford 2 Coventry 2 - Flowery Version


By CovSid67
August 15 2010

Due to the delicate temperament of certain Coventry City supporters, there will be two versions of the match report for yesterdays fixture versus Watford....

Rather obviously, Coventry City are the greatest team in the known world, though sometimes their performances do dip below the levels expected from the footballing equivalent of the Harlem Globetrotters. And sadly, daring to criticise any poor display could see more dummies thrown from prams, so, with that in mind, you can now choose from the 'flowery BS' version, or something nearing the truth.

Read on for 'flowery' - truth to follow later....

Aidy Bothrooyd's superb tactical genius, which saw Coventry City pretend to be dis-interested in this fixture for 75 minutes, before blitzing Watford and stealing a point, helped take Coventry City into third place in the table. Genius. And they really should have won too, with Doyle's late effort saved by Loach.

Coventry City used their third and fourth keepers of the season, despite only having played three fixtures (Two if you don't count the cup, which you really shouldn't be doing .... though I guess that means the club has only used three keepers, as Doyle's appearance won't actually count), with all doing enough to warrant interest from Barcelona and Real Madrid.

David Bell's strike, surely already 'Goal Of The Season' (Actually it was rather good), began the superb come-back, before Jutkiewic's penalty - one of the best ever, and against a keeper so good he was in the England squad against Hungary last Wednesday, which makes it even better - made the scoreline 2-2.

This result totally justified Sir Aidy's decision to not bother competing in the League Cup, and makes everybody that complained about his fielding a weakened side look very foolish. Very foolish indeed. Don't ever dare question him again, you losers.

With Coventry City now unbeaten in two Championship fixtures, and sitting proudly in a play-off place, Aidy Boothroyd is surely a 'must' for the next England manager?! Though not before he's taken his ever-improving Coventry City side into the Premiership, and maybe even the Champions League....

TEAM: (I) Turner (Quirke 17), Keogh, (B) Turner, Cameron, Cranie, Bell, Carsley, Doyle, McSheffrey (Gunnarsson 62), Eastwood (Platt 62), Jutkiewicz. SNU: McPake, Wood, Clingan, Baker

Watford 2 Coventry 2 - Flowery Version
Posted by: Covcitytilidie (IP Logged)
Date: 15/08/2010 15:16

What do you think? You can have your say by posting below.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.

Re: Watford 2 Coventry 2 - Flowery Version
Posted by: Jonathan Winsky (IP Logged)
Date: 15/08/2010 19:09

Yesterday at 7:17pm I wrote: "An excellent performance by Watford to dominate the match and until the 88th minute to have scored two goals and conceded none, and it really bodes well for the rest of the season. Just a shame we blotted our copybook by conceding two late goals to draw 2-2 and leave a bitter taste in the mouth, but apart from that excellent".

Four hours later, I compared the match to that evening's Twenty20 Cup final between Somerset and winners Hampshire.

http://www.hof.org.uk/showthread.php?t=2403&p=19514&viewfull=1#post19514

Click here to read why I sensationally sacrificed the big bucks of Chelsea for the adventure of Watford

http://uk.sitestat.com/ecb/ecb-website/s?home.stats.premier_leagues.page.network.sites.middlesex&category=not_logged_in&ns_type=clickout&ns_url=http://bit.ly/4YsurZ------------------ -http://uk.sitestat.com/ecb/ecb-website/s?home.stats.premier_leagues.page.network.sites.middlesex&category=not_logged_in&ns_type=clickout&ns_url=http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7f/Metropolitan_Line_Heraldry_white_bg.JPG/180px-Metropolitan_Line_Heraldry_white_bg.JPG

(image on left not representative of how relative my support of Watford is to my support of Middlesex)

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment. We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals. We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards. If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing abuse@sportnetwork.net