Player ratings v City


By Jack is the Truth
September 14 2014

Apologies to Jack for accidentally deleting his thread. But the good news is that he is now a front page feature. I did hear that MotD made Sanchez their best player but Jack makes it Jack. Any views? Jack's ratings follow:

Woj 6/10, his distribution/kicking in the first half was giving me kittens, and he was at fault for the second gaol. he put flamini on the line and then proceeeded to kncok the ball off flaminis head, when he was in the perfect position

Debuchy 7/10 played very well defensively we saw his impact after he went off

Mert 6.5/10 not much to say

Kos 7/10 not much to say

Monreal 7/10 actually had a good game

Flam 6/10 didnt do badly untill the first goal

Jack 8.5/10 MOTM

Ramsey 6/10 not on form

Ozil 6/10 in and out of the game

Sanchez 8/10 quality

Welbeck.  6.5/10 was not Dat guy today, although he could have bee

Player ratings v City
Posted by: Arsenal Times (IP Logged)
Date: 14/09/2014 17:46

What do you think? You can have your say by posting below.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2014:09:16:18:16:09 by eduardo.

Re: Player ratings v City
Posted by: BFGunner (IP Logged)
Date: 14/09/2014 20:20

Just gives me the opportunity to repost that all those slating Woj for the second goal are batshìt.

Re: Player ratings v City
Posted by: Padre Pio (IP Logged)
Date: 14/09/2014 23:06

He didn't say goal he said gaol which is very different

"When we had to suffer the team is a lion because they suffer together." 4 July 2020 at Wolverhampton Wanderers
Arteta on his team's first away victory at a club above them in the Premiership since September 2015 at Leicester.

Re: Player ratings v City
Posted by: Jack_is_the_truth (IP Logged)
Date: 14/09/2014 23:18

Such a bad idea Padre, people are going to think we cant spell on this forum.

Re: Player ratings v City
Posted by: Jonny Kipper (IP Logged)
Date: 15/09/2014 00:13

Apart from Ozil, who I wouldn't have scored the same as Szczesny or Flamini, I agree with Jack's ratings.

Re: Player ratings v City
Posted by: Padre Pio (IP Logged)
Date: 15/09/2014 06:54

Quote:
Jack_is_the_truth
Such a bad idea Padre, people are going to think we cant spell on this forum.
It was your spelling Jack

"When we had to suffer the team is a lion because they suffer together." 4 July 2020 at Wolverhampton Wanderers
Arteta on his team's first away victory at a club above them in the Premiership since September 2015 at Leicester.

Re: Player ratings v City
Posted by: Jack_is_the_truth (IP Logged)
Date: 15/09/2014 10:13

My point exactly? I wouldnt have put me on the front page verbatum
i would have proof read first, because i know i have the tendancy to omitt a few letters when i touch typesmoking smiley

Re: Player ratings v City
Posted by: Nikfonso (IP Logged)
Date: 15/09/2014 10:39

Pretty much spot on Jack apart Ozil. I thought he was dire on Saturday but strangely if you watched MOTD like i did yesterday, it looked like he had a decent game.

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/280x200q90/911/0rk24g.jpg

Re: Player ratings v City
Posted by: Padre Pio (IP Logged)
Date: 15/09/2014 13:03

Quote:
Jack_is_the_truth
My point exactly? I wouldnt have put me on the front page verbatum
i would have proof read first, because i know i have the tendancy to omitt a few letters when i touch typesmoking smiley
Yes well you werent on a train with poor wi fi and only an ipad to update site with.
Normally I would sub it but it was difficult enough to cut and paste.
I suggest you sub your own stickies in future.

"When we had to suffer the team is a lion because they suffer together." 4 July 2020 at Wolverhampton Wanderers
Arteta on his team's first away victory at a club above them in the Premiership since September 2015 at Leicester.

Re: Player ratings v City
Posted by: jar5 (IP Logged)
Date: 16/09/2014 14:29

Man jack left clichy for deaddddddd

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment. We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals. We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards. If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing abuse@sportnetwork.net