Poll: Should Tranmere retain Les Parry as manager?
By Matthew Jones
May 10 2010
We ask you if Peter Johnson should appoint Les Parry as Rovers' full-time manager

Tranmere Rovers this weekend completed the great escape, when a 3-0 win over Stockport lifted them out of the relegation zone and left them one point ahead of Gillingham, who made the drop to League Two.
Just seven months previously, a 1-0 defeat against the same side had left Tranmere four points adrift inside the League One relegation zone after Parry's first game in charge, whilst following a 1-0 defeat to Leyton Orient six weeks later, Tranmere were left bottom of League One and seven points behind 20th placed Brighton.

However, Rovers managed to turn their form around, and despite a dip in mid-late April, Rovers picked up enough points to beat the drop and secure their League One status for another season.
The game at Stockport however saw the end of Les Parry's contract as Tranmere manager, after he was only appointed as Rovers boss until the end of the season in November.
Rovers Chairman Peter Johnson now has a decision to make; does Parry keep the job, or should a new man be appointed?
We're looking for your opinions on this topic, with our poll available on the front page for you to vote on.
If you want a new man, who do you want and why? Or do you think Parry should stay on as boss?
We will close the poll one week today and publish the results. Happy voting!
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.
The question would have been better phrased -
What do you think tranmere will do about the managers position?
IMO, My heart says stay with Les, but my head says, I believe Rovers would be better off with a manager experienced at this level, who knows how to win enough to at least be in the play-offs come the end of next season!
The budget will dictate the decision, so I believe that Les will continue!

We have showed that even the current team, which is extremely weak, were able to beat Millwall, Southampton and Norwich at home, whilst also beating the teams that needed to be beaten at the time of play; Exeter, Gillingham and Stockport. All were crucial games, all were 'must-wins' and we won them...with Wycombe being the proverbial kink in the stats. All those games shows he is a good motivator, and someone who can get the best out of his team.
My only worry is the future. This squad is weak, it relies on loanees and the budget will be cut again next year. The only real change I want is a change in thinking. We have to get our kids in the first team, learning, week in week out - not giving other teams the platform to develop their talent. We should be better than that!
Other than Les - I would like the Chief as the Chief with Mathias to guide him. I like Ray, but he is not a manager. The Chief could well be.
I think Les deserves to be given a chance to do that.
If any other manager had come in in October and kept them up them staying on would not be in question. Objective was to keep the club up and they achieved that - they couldn't have done more.
Quote:Dave 080510
If any other manager had come in in October and kept them up them staying on would not be in question. Objective was to keep the club up and they achieved that - they couldn't have done more.
That's the key thing for me Dave. If it had been anybody else, what some people class as a "proper manager" (like the ones who took Stockport, Southend, Wycombe and Gillingham down), then the fans would be in huge support of him. But because it's somebody with no experience he's immediately ridiculed and put down.
Les has surrounded himself with a wonderful team of coaching staff and between them they've done a terrific job. Give them a chance, they can't do much worse than Barnes
Or both games against Oldham when we either failed to show or couldn't be arsed?
Walsall away when we were leading?
Under Les we had the chances to change our last day circumstances, and because of him failed to do so.

We were fighting relegation, we were never gonna win every game.
Whilst you've named four their what about the likes of Southampton, Norwich, Millwall, even Charlton away where I genuinely walked away from the ground as if we'd been beaten, because we were so good that day to get only a point from The Valley was a massive disapointment.
Then theirs games we've won such as Exeter, Orient, Yeovil, Bristol, Brentford, Southend, Brighton - all of which were six pointers at the time they were played because they were either against teams close to us or, were games we had to win to keep up with the teams just outside the r.zone. I know the four you've pointed out we lost (and disapointingly, especially Hpool which was arguably the worst football I've ever seen, but we got a point from it remember.. without that point we'd be in L2 right now!)
Whilst we always seemed to crumble from actually crossing the line until yesterday, we achieved exactly what we set out to, and many doubted we would.
We've also had a little cup run and we could have, on another day, beat Wolves. If Gornell had scored that open goal our finances may be a few hundred thousand better off. Equally had ITM scored that open goal against Carlisle at home (I think) we'd have been a little calmer on Saturday!
With his own squad I think Les could achieve mid-table easily. Obviously theirs some (and I don't mean anyone on this site) that expect promotion or something every season but our budget is the lowest in this league (yes.. worse than Stockports) so next year if we escape the drop on the last day then so be it.

Also just to point out last 3 games draw away at Brentford beat millwall and thump stockport. What a way to stay up.
Why is les les qualified than an ex player to take charge????
He has been there for 16+ years listening to team talks tactics etc... Man management is a big part of being a physio which is a key. He appoints 2 great coaches to carry out the coaching (RM got shirliff to do majority of the coaching).
He has to be given the option to stay on with chief and garno.
Especially as our budget is small.
Hope we find a way so that if it does go pear shaped can go back to physio as this man deserves to be at the club for life!!!
Since October I've changed my mind a few times and more often have been in the 'need a new Manager' camp but having spoken to Les personally and onthings I've heard ahead of next season he definitely should have a chance to take us further next season.
The fact he may be a cheaper option is a bonus but not the main reason why he should be considered.
My worry is that we have achair that is setting such a low budget (unrealistically and unreasonably low in my opinion) that only the most experienced of managers could even hope tp cope with the situation.The other factor is that an experienced manager is better placed to push PJ whereas I suspect LP has been too far down the food chain to really push achairman who at present is a liability. In normal circumstances Les would deserve achance but given PJ plans I think we need to put sentiment aside and go for an experienced manager although I am convinced for all the raesons above that PJ would prefer Parry
I'm not going to be happy with 'hard to beat' tactics and a team full of loanees (if I wanted to watch a premiership nursery team I'd watch Liverpool reserves).
So yeah he deserves another season but I'd want a few changes.
As for the playing career. Who cares if he played? Management and Playing are 2 entirely different things - if he stays on he's a manager now - not a physio (most of the time).
That is why so many people have a conflict between their heart (Les) and their head (someone with experience).
I think though this is a hard football decision that needs to be made with the head.
From a football perspective having Les as a permanent No2; makes perfect sense i.e. Wilkins (Chelsea), Lewington (Fulham) and it gives Les a reward for what he has gone through for the club this season. However also from a footballing perspective appointing an experienced No1 to lead and blend a team is my preference.
If it's sentimental reasons then it's ridiculous, we either keep him on (which I think will happen), or he goes back to physio or leaves totally.
If they were going to make him a permanent number two they may as well give him a go at being number one.
He has done fantastically well with what he had, he should walk back to his kit room with his head held high and reputation as a tranmere legend (rightly) enhanced even further than it was before. Les, do yourself (and you wife) a favour and quit while your ahead mate.
My number 1 as always would be Mathias and the Chief (or a combination of the two)
Six of those players have today been released and four more have gone back to their parent Clubs (even though one may return in Labidie).
That means that already the start of next season will look a lot different to the squad last August.
I believe in the principle of a permanent number 2.
As I said before someone like Ray Wilkins at Chelsea or Ray Lewington at Fulham, guys that have served under numberous managers, do this job effectively.
The point of the role is that:
1. There is always instability as far as the manager's job is concerned and if the manager were to depart then the 'permanent' number 2 can be trusted to fill the role until a new manager is found
2. They understand the culture of the club intimately and ensure that when the manager joins they know how to behave and play the game to get on the support of the chairman, fans, staff and players.
To a larger degree the Liverpool boot room served this purpose effectively for 2 decades.
I think that only a specific type of individual can perform the role effectively a. They need to be passionate about the club b. They need to represent the history and principles of the club c. They need to be respected by the fans, owner and players d. They need to be trusted as a man that they don't have intentions to take the managers job e. They need to be trusted that they have the ability to fill in to manage the club in a crisis.
For me Les has these qualities and to not have him in a senior position would be to waste his unique abilities.
To put him back to a physio role would be to waste his abiilties and my view is that there are people with a skill set more suited to management than he does. Therefore I would give him a responsible position at the club as a permanent number 2.
And as a physio I don't thing Doctor Parry would be 'wasted' so to speak.

2. I'm sure a physio role is a very worthwhile profession, however I'm sure that it isn't a skill set that would be impossible to find with a strong ad pinned up at the local hospital. However how I invisage his role would be far more difficult to find a suitable candidate.
Peace and love,
“If the chairman says he wants us to stay I’ll be only too pleased to sit down with him and discuss it. But if at the end of the day the board think they want to look elsewhere, then I have got no control over that. I won’t spit my dummy out. The board will make that decision in good faith and I will respect that and I will just get on with being physio.”
This quote from Les states he would 'like' the managers job, however will be understanding and supportive if it is not given i.e. "The board will make that decision in good faith and I will respect that".
Cheers,
Personally I think a manager should be able to bring his own Asst Manager (& coaching staff IF budgets allow.) Assistant Managers usually do all the coaching at teams, and Les has openly admitted Wayne and Shaun do all this because he isn't qualified.
I think the idea of Les remaining Physio but being a point of contact any manager can ask for help etc, an "Advisor" if you like but managers being forced to work with an Asst Manager may put them off.
At clubs like Fulham/Chelsea it works as they have the funds to bring in many coaches, we don't. Our Asst. Manager is also coach etc.

With regards to the posts that you deleted.
Can you explain what are the matters that have recently been brought to light that suggest that Les would be equiped for the No1 role.
Other posts on this thread were delted as the Thread had gone way off topic on certain posts so I tidied it up!
Fair enough, I completely understand.
I have nothing further to say on this topic.
All the best and I apologise for my contribution in making the thread go out of hand.
Cheers,
