Match Discussion: Southend United (Home)
By Total Tranmere
November 21 2014
A place for fans of both Rovers and Southend United to discuss Saturday afternoon's upcoming match at Prenton Park as the 2014/15 season continues with Rovers looking for their first League win in over three months at home to the Shrimpers....
With the 2014/15 League Two season now well underway, our match discussion thread returns for Tranmere's home match against Southend United and will also be available for all Rovers games home and away during the upcoming campaign.
Whether you are unable to make the game for any reason, or even if you are attending, this is the place to discuss all the pre-match build up including team line-up and score predictions, events during the match itself and all the post match fall-out and analysis. The thread is open to fans of both sides to discuss the events surrounding the game so if you haven't got a Message Forum accounts yet then why not sign up now?

Tranmere of course host Southend United on Saturday afternoon at Prenton Park with kick off at 3.00pm and will be looking to bounce from last week's defeat away at high-flying Luton Town and record their first League win in over three months.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2014:11:27:19:14:19 by Deadly Submarine.
Then I ate his Liver.......... with some baked beans and a can of coke.
Quote:goosed
Adams out we are worse off now more than ever
Really? You think Micky Adams should go? Words fail me.
Half of the current squad shouldn't even be here, they are simply not good enough to wear the shirt.
Who do you suggest we get in then Goosed? Assuming they would actually want the job to begin with?
Micky Adams has inherited a team of duds, they are not good enough to play at this level and are only here because they are being paid buttons.
Our current dilemma stems from the former chairmans reign, until we are able to take control, i.e the window opens, we are having to use these inept players and try and strengthen using the loan market.
I have every faith in Micky Adam's ability to keep us up this season. He's only had about 6 weeks in the job with a team of players he would probably love to get shut of given the chance.
What has Holmes done wrong to be left out of the team-he IMO has been one of our best,if not the best,this season.
The players in the last few matches seemed to be playing for each other-today with 4 changes we were like a team of strangers,particularly in the first half.
Ridehalgh was at fault for both goals-for the second one,he should have pulled their winger back and taken the yellow card 'for the team'.
Southend were first to every ball and should have been out of sight long before the end. That they weren't was because of some good saves by Brezovan[rightly starting in goal] and some wayward finishing.
Of the new loanees,Aimson did ok,as did Fenelon in patches.Was not impressed with Martin who was too easily brushed off the ball throughout and didn't exactly put himself about in the first half.
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2014:11:22:19:54:24 by Hoots Mon.
Looks like you might have been watching a different game at Luton?
However the team won't go down. It's the defense and goalkeepers that are the best part of the whole squad and a few other people like Jennings and Stockton, but when the goals start coming a bit more Tranmere will be fine.
Lets' not forget until the last 2 weeks Tranmere had 3 draws and 2 wins from 5 games and were competitive against Luton, so if that kind of improvement compared to the end of Edward's period continues, then form will increase and the team will be fine.
However the team and the manager need to put this substandard performance to bed and come out and just get over it move on and come out fighting next time.
Then I ate his Liver.......... with some baked beans and a can of coke.
Quote:hespo
I can't believe people still are saying we will be fine etc.we won't with this squad.were going to the conference quickly with this lot.
Totally agree with that. Six points the gap already and I can't see where the next win is coming from. We are in big trouble.
The system was clearly not working but Adams would not change things around.
We are absolute certainties for relegation with a woeful defence and little or no scoring threat
Quote:Deadly Submarine
Some people had a right go when I said I didn't even want Adams in the first place. Hate to say I told you so but....
Because of the way I feel the previous manager was treated,I have purposely sat on the fence refraining from making any comment on the new manager. I have to say that the foundations of this fence are beginning to get somewhat wobbly.
But for me the reason we were bad at the back is because we had nothing and I mean absolutely nothing up front. Shocking for a pro!
If we had not be losing I'm certain our striker(ha!) would have been dragged off!
If the team can get players like Stockton and Madjo bagging a few and Koumas comes back to add a bit of experience and clout in the middle and players like Woodards get back in the fray they will be alright I feel in the long-term.
Bearing in mind there will be the opportunity to get a few new faces in in January and Tranmere have in the last 7 games battled back from behind on 3 separate occasions to get a result one of which they won.
It looks somewhat troublesome a situation but there's enough time to build on the improvements made since the last 4-5 games of Edwards and I think the team will do it and so will Adams.
Then I ate his Liver.......... with some baked beans and a can of coke.
Quote:bigmart
Matt, we may have only conceded 2 yesterday but it could and should have been a lot more, we were clueless and I cannot see us staying up.
People can quote stats all they like but the only one that matters is where we are in the league.Those who were there will know that you are right Mart.Those who weren't will imagine and quote the 'ifs and buts' excuses.
It is hard to blame Adams he has inherited a dreadful collection of players.Shuffling the pack with Bell Baggies and Rowe cannot disguise the fact that these are players that more often flatter to receive. Likewise with Laird.
Ltd is clear that Adams does not rate the squad but at this stage of the season it is difficult to reshape on the scale needed.The last week still looks like quantity taking priority over quality.
I cannot see the logic of those that think will escape relegation. Our inability to beat poor teams suggests that we are where we deserve to be and where we will stay.Six points gap is massive for a team who have played for more than a quarter of a season without a win.
Adams: 0 Wins 3 Draws 2 Defeats
Quote:Deadly Submarine
Edwards First 5 League Games: 2 Wins 1 Draw 1 Defeat
Adams: 0 Wins 3 Draws 2 Defeats
Sub, for Edwards that's only 4 games
Quote:wpato7
One win and everyone's opinions will change. You've seen what one (admittedly very poor) performance can do. There are at least two worse teams than us in this league
But these ''worse teams'' [apart from Hartlepool]all seem to be able to pick up points much more regularly than us.
Every ball is a white ball............TRFC
Quote:Deadly Submarine
Edwards First 5 League Games: 2 Wins 1 Draw 1 Defeat
Adams: 0 Wins 3 Draws 2 Defeats
Southend : Best team ive seen at Prenton this season
Luton: Most difficult away game weve had this season, and we could of had a draw on another day.
Bear in mind, Adams has been restricted to loan signings and dead wood from Edwards rein. By January we will have more of idea of how the final part of the season will pan out... Still think Adams is far superior manager than Edwards, we are still feeling the pain of his time at Prenton with nervous displays at home
We have decent defence if we play 4-4-2 we have full backs who can defend reasonably well, they are not wing backs and cant cross the ball, they are now being asked to attack and seem to have forgotten there 1st priority should be defending.
What has baggie done wrong? Assume this is baggage from previous encounters with Adams as he hasn't even given his a chance so far.
Stockton isn't good enough, spends to much time standing still trying to get a foul, he needs to be playing with someone who has decent movement and can open up space for him, he will get us 10 goals.
I agree with the other comments that we will stay up, but only if we change the system, if we continue to play 3 at the back and 2 wing backs that cant beat a man or cross we are sunk!
New guys looked ok but to many changes every week, pick a team and give them a run in the team.
I am concerned with the lack of ambition and decision making from the bench on match day, we don't seem to have a plan B if plan A is obviously not working, it was crying out for changes on Saturday but nothing really came and lack of passion/direction from the bench was a worry. Almost oh well see what happens next week!
Get Danny Holmes back on the pitch for some effort and passion!!
I'd drop Ridehalgh & Holness and play Holmes, Ihiekwe Donacien & new CB as a back 4.
Wasn't sure about the No. 30 as he seemed a bit lightweight & too easily shoved off the ball, so either Baggie, Rowe or Richards in for him
I think there is also a case to start Odejayi for his height and size, with another more nimble striker playing up there with him.
Rowe's other main shortcoming appears to be an attitude problem if rumours from within the club are to be believed, excessive sulking when not selected. Hardly suggests that he is up for the battle!
Quote:beb end regular
Criticise the No 30 for being lightweight fine - but on that basis only Richards might be viewed as a possible alternative, the other two being extremely lightweight.
Rowe's other main shortcoming appears to be an attitude problem if rumours from within the club are to be believed, excessive sulking when not selected. Hardly suggests that he is up for the battle!
But Richards and Rowe at least try when they are on the pitch. In the first half,No 30 [Martin]did not exactly push himself to get involved. In your first match,I would have thought that you do your level best to create a good impression-he didn't. After half time,he improved. But it was too late then.
On the subject of ''excessive sulking'',Baggie briefly appeared at the back of the director's box about 15 minutes before kick off. He,to put it mildly,did not look as if he was full of the joys of spring.
Quote:Deadly Submarine
Apologies it should have been W2 D1 L2!
However he had the use of certain players, that some could say are some of the better players in the squad, like Stockton, Koumas, Hill and Woodards, three of which Adams has not been able to use regularly and arguably would do and in Stockton's case has just recently been able to use.
However compare the last 5 games Edwards was in charge for, versus the next 5 under Adams, with basically the same squad bar a couple of new short-term additions.
Edwards 4 losses and 1 draw.
Adams, 3 draws and 2 wins, 5 games unbeaten.
Adams has managed that with quickie additions and an injury hit squad, however Edwards enjoyed, bar Ridehalgh, a full squad to use in the initial instance and I'm certain players like Hill, Koumas and Woodards would be strong bets for getting a game practically every week under Adams, were they fully fit.
There's plenty of time to turn things around and I'm confident things will turn around, but some momentum needs rekindling quick, or the recent run of form will look like a brief bit of escapism from the previous concerns.
Then I ate his Liver.......... with some baked beans and a can of coke.
Every ball is a white ball............TRFC
Think Micky Adams and Mark Palios need to instil into these players that they are now playing for their futures at the club.
A kind of verbal warning if you like, it is apparent that there are a few who think it's fine to put in half a shift.
Got to ensure every single player gives their all, or they will be on the way out come January.
The gap is already alarming, and unless we sort things out, we could end up bottom of the pile with a 12 point gap by Christmas.
Then I ate his Liver.......... with some baked beans and a can of coke.
