The run to the tape starts here
Fitness Test
By Grockle
August 6 2008
With the Olympics only hours away it seems fitting that we face Notts in a vital four dayer today. This could be a deciding game in our Championship year and the rain could be the deciding factor! 12 have been named with Steffan Jones the doubt with an early morning fitness test to decide on his inclusion. We could either start our move towards the top or the foot of the table based on this one
v Nottinghamshire LVCC1 @ Taunton Wednesday 6 August 2008
Last year this was the vital rubber against Notts at home and away. We came out victorious at their place and went on to take the title. This year the two up and coming counties are battling it out at the top of the next division and the results of the 40 pointer could decide the County Champions for 2008.
Our form has taken a dip in general and there is no doubt that the longer format offers the best chance of honours in this season. However the weather isn't helping and our time away from home has been long and not particularly inspiring. It is hoped that today any rumours of divisions and loss of form are put aside and we get down to the impoprtant stuff from the start (at present the weather suggests that it will be on time).
Somerset have named 12 but Steffan Jones will have a late fitness test and so I would suggest that the likely eleven will not include him unless there are no doubts about him while others need treatment. Niel Edwards seems to have fallen out of favour for an opening spot so the captain will open and Zander will take the number 3 spot
Therefore I expect the following to be out there at 11;
Trescothick, Langer, de Bruyn, Hildreth, Blackwell, Trego, Kieswetter, Phillips, Thomas, Caddick, Willoughby
I'd argue it is our strongest line-up but it wouldn't be lessened by Edwards taking his place in a more 'English' line-up. However, Zander would have a case for performances picking the side and he has been a most consistent addition to the line-up.
Strong seam attack in overcast conditions I would suggest with Ian Blackwell providing our only spin option. I'll be there for some of this game (weather permitting) so there will be updates on both the frontpage and the forum during playing hours. See you down there or online. The side is almost as suggested but Steff passed the 'fitness test' and took the place of Ben Phillips
We nearly started on time (11:05) and I get there just before the 10th over with us batting with the princely sum of 16 (and I saw 4 of them) for 2! The pitch is almost in front of the new River stand - the sight cover is actually on the far side of the Botham stand and the rope is a good 5 to 8 yards from the boundary on the scoreboard stand. But the outfield is very heavy...boundaries to the new stand side along the ground aren't making it so there's no real chance of fours on the surface to the much longer "shop" side.
The damage? Langer LBW Shreck with 2 on the board and Mr Trescothick said hello to Mr Pattinson for the first time by wafting a catch to Ealham on the same score. Notts are attacking with 3 slips, a gully and a sort of short mid off while Hildreth and de Bruyn try and sort out the damage and get this innings going. It's very overcast but a bit humid so the two Nottinghamshire bowlers are putting their all into making this a true disaster. Big innings from both our men are required for this day to get back on track.
For the 13th pver Notts change the bowler at the River and we see Andre Adams for the first time in this game. But when Zander drives at a full length ball and deposits the snick into the hands of third slip, it is off Pattinson instead. He goes for 9 and we have the massively impressive 23. In comes Peter Trego at number 5 - some may look at this in surprise but given the present position on the pitch he is probably a better bet than either Craig or Ian and hopefully will be the savious of this dire first hour!
But no! It gets even worse as first Trigger is comprehensively cleaned up by Adams with only 1 to his name and then the man in need of a good score, Ian Blackwell, misjudges one from Pattinson, fails to keep it down and plops it in to a fielders hands for another single. 24 for 5. I come back upstaris to report on this just as Hildreth puts a wide one towards first slip and Lo and Behold! the fielder doesn't drop it - fielding practice and his first loose shot just when we don't need it 35 for 6. Alfonso is in at number 8. What kind of total we can expect I have absolutely no idea but 3 figures is a pipe dream at the moment!!
The first real supporting applause finally arrives in the 26th over when Thomas goes down on one knee and smacks a boundary to the new seating to bring up the 50. But four runs later the pain of watching this game intensifies as a defensive stance from Kieswetter to Adams doesn't keep the ball out and his middle stump goes flying past the wicketkeeper. 54 for 7 and Steffan has had almost no time to settle down for a bit of a rest before bowling. It's just before 1:00 in the first day and we are trying to make this look even slightly like a reasonable total by asking the bowlers to hold our innings together and get it over 100 by some miracle. Even Mark Ealham, who has taken over from the OP end just before lunch, looks menacing against us!!
Lunch beckons at 59 for 7 with 28 overs completed. We're three from one of the lowest score milestones (62 against Notss at Bath) but we are a little further from making this game naything like competitive. There were calls for Justin to shut up shop and bring the boys in to give our lot a chance with the conditions as he did last season in a losing cause. Not sure myself. The weather doesn't look like it is going to break today either way and we don't look long for this batting lark so we may get a chance at them after lunch unless Alfonso and Steffan have other plans. If the sun comes out of course we will find the conditions change drastically and we may find ourselves facing the Notts batsmen on a dry featherbed with three days to go. The weather sggests another scenario....and at present there are few Somerset suporters on the ground who would not give up their day at the cricket for long, heavy and prolonged rain.
We pass the 62 mark and at least Steffan shows the rest how it should be done with two majestic straight drives to the boundary off Pattinson - best two shots of the day so far. Unfortunately Alfonso hasn't got his eye in as well as he leaves one that's a bit too close and he is bowled by Adams for 19. It's a real sad way to go when you've got your bat above your head and the wickets come apart! 77 for 8 with our last hope Mr Andrew Caddick striding out.
Pattinson has something to show young Andrew after the latter's comments about his selection ahead of Hoggard and Harmison for the a Test. At 90 he gets one to move away ever so slightly and Ried takes his first catch of the innings to send the elder statesman back to the hutch. Charl comes out in bright sunshine and the pitch is set to dry out and give our bowlers no help whatsoever.
Steffan moves to top scorer with another impressive smash to the boundary off Mr Pattinson. So Charl decides to get us to a hundred with an sort of 'forearm smash' to the Botham off Adams for four. A single brings the Welshman down on strike and after refusing a single he follows suit with another smash to the same place. It all comes to an end as Charl tries to smack one into the churchyard and is caught by Shreck in front of the CA and it's all over for 106. Five for Pattinson and not a lot at all for us!!
The Reply
Welcome back Matt Wood who strides out to open the Notts innings. Unfortunately Andy Caddick is there to welcome him as well with the best ball of the day which bounces and leaves him - but with just enough of a tickle to give Langer a first slip catch ad our first wicket with 2 on the board. It's a miracle Woody doesn't walk back up the wrong steps! Willoughby comes in to bowl the River end opener in brilliant sunshine - is it all going to be different? Well it had better be different because the pitch inspector is here and we've lost eleven already at 2:50 with Caddick getting predigious bounce and 4 runs off the first 3 overs of the Notts reply.
And it's 90 minutes of cat and mouse with the advantage going between the batsmen and the bowlers. Alfonso being given some clatter to the 'shop' and then going past the bat and having a very considerable LBW appeal turned down (probably because the batsman hit it). Charl doing a lot of around the wicket stuff and making them play on more than one occasion. Caddy looking good from both ends with steepling bounce. But nothing to hand and the score moving steadily towards our meagre offering. Just before the tea interval we se Pete Trego for the first time and he makes the breakthrough with a neat little inswinger that fools Shafayat and takes his bails off. 67 for 2 and a possible decider of a session to come given the rain forecast for the next few days. We need a good spell and the pitch inspectors involved because over 14 wickets have gone down to really think we can get anything from this game.
According to the umpires the ball is still doing something but our bowlers aren't quite getting it in the right places and so Notts are getting too many four shots off the backfoot. It is looking a bit easy after Wagh fires a sixe into the new seats. But Trego keeps at him and he complacently flips one in the same general direction to be caught by Thomas diving to his right for 46. 82 for 3. We could have been 84 for 4 in fact when Justin misses a slip catch from Voges. There were questions about whether it carried but the fact that the captain stays down for a considerable period of time suggests that it did.
He therefore sighs a huge one of relief when Voges is flumuxed by Willoughby's swing and is found to be LBW in the 28th at 89 for 4. The 14th wicket of the day and the inspector is still here.
The visitors pass our total with a boundary to non fine 'Third Wurzel' in the 31st and the Patel and Swann look steady. We still haven't seen Steffan Jones in the attack but Trego gets another one to go away and Swann edges his defensive shot to Trescothick at 108. 24 overs to go and we're halfway through the second innings!!
It's therefore time to check the possible fine situation. Thanks to David Green in the press box there is a conversation with the inspector (Mr Jameson) who suggests that though the ball was swinging too much this morning the conditions didn't justify a 106 total. The difficulties of preparing for this game given the rain was also taken into account. The game's present position has far more to do with technique than preperation and so it is highly unlikely that any action will be taken against the pitch - good news. Thank you Mr Green.
With 20 overs to go it's 119 for 5 and with 17 to go Steffan Jones comes on for his first spell with the rag that is the ball!! 130 for 5 - can the man from Wales a) get the ball changed? b) do anything to take this game into another interesting period? The box of balls is coming on and the umpire is going off with them, up the steps into his changing room and back down with something. We then get spectacle of Barrie Leadbetter sprinting back onto the pitch with a ball he likes better than any provided.
The 150 arrives before the "10 to go sign" goes up but Steffan and Andy are making no real headway against two batsmen now well set. The light is getting dark and gloomy by 6 o'clock and there are doubts we'll make it to a 6:45 ish finish. There's enough time for Patel to go to 50 off 72 balls with 7 fours at 168. He and Ried are starting to move away now at it is soon 179 as the byes start to flow and both batsmen go looking for runs. Charl nearly gets Patel but the ball falls just short of him. There's another discussion about the ball and Barrie does some more sprinting to get another one. While that is going on of course everyone has to have a drink and then we are back in play with 9 to go and 200 looking likely. Thomas bounces Patel in poor light and we all think he's trying to get off. But that isn't the case. The next one he sends down, Patel tries to cut and de Bruyn catches him in the deep at 182 for 56 - he looks really god this guy. Mark Ealham comes out to face the last 8 overs with Trego replacing Caddy at the OP.
But the umpires decide it is bad light with 7 to go at 185 for 6 and we've finished a truly strange days cricket with 16 wickets gone and 291 runs scored. What the hell happens with the rest of this game is down to the weather I'm afraid. Notts are 79 runs ahead with four wickets in hand and that could be a winning situation in this game!!
More to come tomorrow? Who the hell knows.
Day 2
There's a bloke who plays for Notts called Chris Read. He keeps wicket and a few years ago he kept Rob Turner from his just desserts - an England tour by being heralded as the young pretender for Alec Stewart's gloves. Well he's been pretty much ignored since then - partly because of some daft misjudgement against the West Indies (I think) where he squatted to avoid a bouncer and was bowled through his legs by a well disguised slow ball.
I tell you this bloke could be a possible candidate for that place Ambrose and Prior are fighting over. He keeps well and, when he's only got the tailender to keep him company he farms the strike so well that Shreck manages 2 while he takes the Notts end total to 230 and is own score to 74 not out - adding 41 to his overnight score.
In between, Thomas and Trego got among the back end of the Notts order Ealham at 186 (Thomas), Adams at 189 (Trego) and Pattinson (Thomas) at 193. But the 124 lead the visitors end on has a lot to do with their captain. Good batting under pressure at the tail end? Now which side needs some of that from a man who wears gloves?
And so we manage to pull ourselves back into this game by the seat of our pants and thanks to the efforts of our bowlers. Now we need the front end to actually do its job for a change and get us more than a Langer and Trescothick partnership to defend in their second innings. Getting past 128 is the first target.
Well it looks like Justin has given himself a good talking to and threatened himself with being dropped down the order if he doesn't pull his socks up. Because he does.... Marcus and the boss take it to the opposing attack and go past 50 in 8 overs - mostly at the expense of Mr Pattinson who goes for 40 off just under 6.
114 when the rain takes hold at about 4:15 but 15 shots for 4 in that so it's patience with a smack for the bad ball (and our England prospect seems to have bowled quite a number). It's 5:45 and the rain is bucketing down with the whole ground swathed in covers and no-one sitting outside. It's unlikely that we'll see any more today because it is grey and very very wet.
Play is abandoned for the day at 5:00 with the rain still lashing down. We've put this game back on a semi-even keel and start tomorrow 10 runs adrift with everyone ready to contribute. Can we all pray that they do and spare a particular bit of your discussion with your chosen diety for Mr Ian Blackwell who needs something in the bank from this game in terms of above average performance figures.
Day 3
A better start to the day weather-wise. Bright and clear with a fresh breeze that might keep the rain away. Justin and Marcus are back at the crease with a big day ahead with luck. But the luck isn't there and Justin snicks one to second slip from Shreck with only 22 added to the overnight 114 but at least we clear the deficit with only one down. For them Shafayat is keeping wicket because it looks like the dislocated finger that forced Read off in the afternoon yesterday has kept him away from the gloves again today. I suppose that is in the hope that they can deal with it in case he needs to bat to save the game!!
Zander comes out to help MT put the score past the 150 mark in the first hour. We hope for the same again before he or Marcus leaves the field for anything other than lunch breaks. The pair are pushing the score along with a number of well run twos alongside the normal Trescothick boundaries.
Too good to last? Well seems so as Marcus follows his captain with a slip dismissal. This time it's Andre Adams providng the ball and Mark Ealham providing the hands but the result is 168 for 2 and our big gun gone for 81 after providing the little edge. Now we do need to see something because this is the part of the game where we seem to stall or falll apart. After the two openers leave the field the middle order has been struggling to keep up the scoring rate while keeping their wickets intact and we cannot have that today under any circumstances. Therefore it is down to James Hildreth to start the move of the recognised batsmen to a score that we can use to either bring this game to a draw or even a win. That means batting out the day without relying on the tail to scrabble the odd 20 or so each with whichever member of the 3,4,5 or 6 has a bit of form in hand on this occasion.
172 for 2 after 50 overs with Zander looking to push the score on as James looks to settle himself and it all looks good until they put their spinners on. de Bruyn starts by slog sweeping Swann to the new seat boundary but the next ball he tries to drive and loses his off bail as the ball goes through the gate - 186 for 3 and Langer puts Craig Kieswetter into the fray who starts with a straight six into Old Pavilion off the second spinner Patel. But the spinners gain the psychological advantage by keeping the two batsmen stranded on 199 during the lunch interval despite their best efforts in the last two overs.
After the break we move over the barrier with the first ball from Swann. The theory seems to be that Craig is in as a kind of 'lunch watchman' to ensure no collapse either side of the break. He seems to have the role of steering Hildreth to a big score while the 'big guns' of Trego and Blackwell wait in the wings for a big push should this partnership establish a decent base. But there are plans and then there's reality. Kieswetter snicks Pattinson for 8 and it's 208 for 4 (or 85 for 4 depending on how you want to look at it). In comes Ian Blackwell with a situation made for him to put all the 'conspiracy theorists' out of their misery. Can he do what we really all want him to do?
NOPE. He tries to put Pattinson into the new stand seats and is caught on the boundary by Franks with 223 on the board. Justin will be unhappy...and he has the right to be I'm afraid. 99 for 5 is not a position we wanted to be in and I'm afraid Ian was probably not sent in to hit the skin off the ball wth huge sixes into the crowd. Peter Trego now has a real job to do alongside James who is doing what is certainly required of him and staying there!
So....I do for the young man who for some inexplicable reason comes dancing down the pitch to Swann, gives the ball a huge swipe and skies it into Shreck's hands at 230. Justin will be apoplectic and has every right to be - daft as a brush and no need whatsoever for it. Alfonso is the next man in to try and return this innings to some vestige of sanity but I think this one has gone and probably will do so today! And in all honesty it deserves to based on our batting efforts to win it.
Thomas does his job commendibly and he and Pete move the score on by 42 before Pete is the one to feather one to Shafayet at 272. It's not enough but the tail is once again showing the front end how to hang around!! Jones strides out, without a lot of fear and they put Pattinson on with the new ball to fire him out. He bounces him, tries to york him and then tries a second bouncer which Steff helps over the in field to the boundary. So Pattinson sends a rocket down which our Welshman sends back past him to the OP boundary. The England man then bounces him twice to finish the over...but we take the honours I think. I only hope they keep trying to bounce and intimidate Mr Jones because he's better than that and will belt them all over the place if they assume he's some kind of late innings rabbit.
Meanwhile at the other end A Thomas is continuing to do his job but that ends when Shreck gets one past him and takes his off stump out. 291 for 8 - with Andy Caddick in at 10 and together they take us over 300 with a Jones boundary. By Tea it's 312 for 8 with Jones putting up a real fight and Caddick giving him as much of the strike as possible. Excellent stuff why the hell can't we see this earlier in an innings? Once again we start dicussing the strategy of reversing the order and getting the bowlers to take the shine off the ball so the 'real' batsmen can play the ball with a little less 'fizz'. Hmmmmmm!
Day 4
Well we're playing. It's grey but windy and it's 85 for 3 at 11:15. Caddick and Thomas are bowling to a crowd of about 150. The bowlers are sending down a lot of four balls or Notts have been told to get on with it. Someone came out from the opposng dressing room and they've started hitting out. Adams was caught on the boundary but off a no ball from Caddick and his next ball went into the new stand as the 'runs required' moves under 100. It's ominous but getting brighter and Notts look more likely to win it than we do. Having said that Adams then tris to drive off Caddy and he absolutely totals him!! 116 for 4. In comes Voges as Willoughby takes over from Alfonso at the River end.
Well we seem to have lost the last two hours worth of posts so I'll recap!!
Charl bowled one ball before they took the sides off for rain at 125 for 4. After a light covering of water with only the pitch covered, the umpires returned to the pitch and seem to have decided that they would bring them out again. However, as the Somerset side congregated to come down the stairs, Phil Frost waved them back in and then the covers came on in force as the drizzle continued.
There was a Somerst conference with Justin, Andy Hurry and Phil just before lunch and then a lot of rain which resulted in all the covers coming on. Lunch was taken at 1:00 as usual.
It is now brighter but the covers stretch right from the new stand to the other boundary with the hard one's on the wicket and the run-up's under canvass. Even if they inspect after lunch (1:45?), there'll be no play for an hour after that.
First possible playing time? 3:00-ish and that is assuming no rain at all between now and then. Which is highly unlikely although not beyond the realms of possibility. Notts would probably like to get out there for about 15 and put us out of our misery. We'd probably now like to stay inside and take our points and a third place spot behind them and Durham.
I'll do the rest from home though because it's one of those days you hate where there is a tantalising possibility of something but it's probably not going to happen!!
A good day to stay at home.
Wonderful conditions for swing bowling.
Not raining.
Yet.
Plenty coming over though by the look of it.
With Caddy back and approaching full form, would it be worth giving Willow a break? He's had a lot of bowling due to AC being unavailable.
That said, forecast for the game is glum and if the pitch sweats and/or the game is played under heavy cloud cover, we'd surely want Willow out there, even if he is knackered?
What about the balance of the side?
Ben Phillips didn't contribute much at Horsham. At the same time the second half our innings fell away quite badly on a flat pitch.
I wonder whether the team selection for the last one was partly to do with worries over AC and/or PT breaking down? Either way, both - touch wood - seem to be fit now.
I personally would be inclined - against a potentially good Notts pace attack - to revert to the balance we had for previous games (prior to the last two.)
My person preference would be to give Wes Durston the go that he deserves in place of Ben Phillips. If Willow is exhausted and/or carrying a knock, I'd give a break and bring Thomas back in his stead. If not Durston, then I'd be tempted either to recall Neil Edwards or give Arul a game, instead of Ben.
What do others think we should do?
and what do others think we will do?
Sadly, I don't really imagine that we will give Wes a chance, but I suspect we may bring Neil back, for Ben.
The problem is that if you are going to risk a less parsimonious spinner in one day games then you can't really rest Willow there irrespective of Caddick's form (he never has been a tight one day bowler although in form he will get you wickets).
Phillips has to play if Willow doesn't I think.

Grockle and fRed - you both seem to have assumed this was a thread about Lord's!
If Willo does need a rest in the CC, then Caddick must play and then have 2 out of Phillips, Jones, Thomas or Turner. This assuming you've got Trego and/or De Bruyn as back up.
Would be happy enough to see Edwards back in.
The question occurred to me as last years game with Notts proved quite exceptional for him. Anyone know/

Heavy rain all week.
LoL
Sixty-six Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Cheer up,I'm sure we can all do a lovely version of singing in the rain.
I'll be Gene Kelly.
Who'll be my Jean Hagen?
LoL
Sixty-six Seasons a Somerset Supporter
It'll have to be Tractor then.
Tractor,get practicing those steps.
However, they are 50% different. So far as I am aware, Friday and Saturday are forecast to be fine so we can, at least, strive to make 450 one day and bowl Notts out the next (or vice-a-versa) and thus claim 12 points from the game.
My worry is that Durham will hammer Kent and gain the only win of the round.
Unfortunately, the great Mushy's comeback at Old Trafford will be ruined by the rain. If the game went ahead as normal Lancs would be annihilated by the great man on their turning track.

I think that Neil's absence from the Championship team of recent has been as a result of some personal circumstances; not on account of his form - which admittedly has not been as prolific as last year's.
It would be good to see him back anyway.
There was certainly mention of "compassionate leave" at the time of his initial absence.
So Notts have inserted us. Let's make Read regret that as much as Key did!
poo.
And as I type that, both openers have departed......not ideal.
No commentary I can find, Bobstan.
Not a totally ideal start!
Hants-Yorks yet to start.
Durham batting against Kent.
Broad starts for England, so won't turn up at Taunton tomorrow.
If things don't improve rapidly, then unless the light is unplayable, I think we might see another 50 for 8 declaration by Langer, as we did at Lord's last year.
Who's Broad starting in lieu of, FE?
Bell moves to 3, Flintoff to 6.
Strauss
Cook
Bell
Pietersen
Collingwood
Flintoff
Ambrose
Broad
Anderson
Harmison
Panesar
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008:08:06:11:54:55 by Frome Exile.

I know it didn't work there, but there's little sense in struggling on until the rain comes and then having to bowl in far fresher conditions later in the match.
Better to be 60 playing 150 on first innings than 95 playing 250.
Not the best of starts I see,oh dear.
Any swing bowler worth their salt will have a field day out there today.
Fear not,if we get a chance to bowl later on we can do the same.
No sign of rain from the West.
Just more of the same.
If Willow can bowl anything like what he did at Lord's (as opposed to Horsham) then there's a chance that we can be no more than 80 or 90 down on first innings.
If we struggle on and then it rains so that they get to come back another day when it's fresh, then it will then be all but impossible to win the game and very difficult to save it.
need a big innings from Hildreth and Kieswetter
THe question also is would we have them at 36 for 6 if we had one the toss? I don't think so. We've hardly had anyone in this trouble at this stage of an innings all year.
Most depressing.
There are a few high dark ones towrds the moor but from the West it is clearing.
This is not good.
Not good I tell you.
However, I'm fed up with heart to hearts, lock-ins and togh talking. This needs to be backed up on the field. THe fact that we have so many of this tough talking proves there is a problem in the first place.
Go on Alfonso!!

Quote:bloke
This Pattinson seems to be quite good, I've never heard of him before - do you think the England selectors are aware of him?
I used to have him in my fantasy team, until he was picked for England and I used my last transfer to swap him!
Could be a long afternoon.
From what Jim and Grockle say we're stuffed unless Mr Frost has secretly prepared a terror track.
And it's more likely that we'll play spinners well in the middle of a one-day innings than that Mr Frost would have done that.
Not pleased.


After all, on paper this 'performance,' is redolent of the inept performance which we all of us saw at Lord's on Monday. Perhaps, if a casual approach to one day cricket (including not picking your best side) leads to a collapse in the one day form of the game, you may then bat like utter turkeys in the proper cricket, too?
We'll see just how good the bowling conditions are now!!!
We've heard so much about how Langer thinks this is really competitive cricket in Div 1, now is the time to prove it!! Are our 409 seamers up for it? Lets hope so.
Wagh has made a string of 50s this season, when batting conditions at Trent Bridge have been extremely difficult. He is a key man who may very well make a big score.
Incidentally, I wonder if spending all season playing in swinging conditions at Trent Bridge will be a big help to Notts in this game (assuming it is still swinging.)
If we get another couple of wickets, I'll start to wonder (given the sunshine) if the issue is something other than atmpospheric conditions.
{but for now I'm going to assume the problems were all cloud/humidity related}
Jim and others;
Question;
Is it still feeling humid?
The ball can swing without cloud cover when it's humid.
Log on to find out the good news.........106 all out ?????
What the hell happened ??
Think I'll go back to bed.
Grizzzly
The blue sky is going fast.
It is really filling up again,it will rain by the end of play.
Very humid,warm though a little breezy.
A warm breeze.
Let's hope it fills in like this morning for a good 100 minutes or so before the heavens open.
Or perhaps I'm just deluding myself. Perhaps we just showed the same lack of wit with the bat today, as we had done on Monday?
Hopefully the rain will set in and will save us co I can't see anything else save us.
I think there is merit in what AG says. THe lack of technique on Monday was galling. I think this is where our issues are rather than the weather etc.
Surely time for Jonah soon, too?
Come on, for goodness sakes.
Grockle,if you see LoL can you tell him I've lost the means of contacting him.
He'll know what you mean.
Ashwell Prince has signed for them too

And, boy, did we need that!
If the rain holds off for one more hour after tea, maybe we could manage to get them 5 down or something before they clear the arrears in which case...
Quote:Big Jim
Grockle,if you see LoL can you tell him I've lost the means of contacting him.
He'll know what you mean.
Jim, check your private messages....
He's made loads of runs in low scoring games at T Bridge this season, and repeated the dose here.
While they're at it, what about Mr Trego?
Yorks 133 for 5.
Lancs 193 for 8 with Mushy wicketless but four for the "Special Talent".
If we lose this we will be too far back to mount a challenge for the title as there are too many good teams in between. Our 30+ team appears to be creaking. Apart from Hildy, Trego and Kieswetter its a pretty old team.
Pouring down here now,that'll freshen the pitch up a bit.
Skittle them first thing tomorrow,a few of our top order put together some partnerships and we can set a wiining total.
Fear not,we shall prevail.
Keep the faith, everyone!
Somerset never recovered from losing openers Justin Langer and Marcus Trescothick with only two runs on the board.
Langer was pinned lbw by a Charlie Shreck inswinger, while Trescothick was well caught by Mark Ealham low to his left in the gully off Pattinson.
Zander de Bruyn, Trego and Ian Blackwell fell in quick succession to make it 25 for five as Adams and Pattinson bowled effectively in tandem under heavy skies.
Full report :- [www.ecb.co.uk]
The link to my Photos on Photobucket - [s1152.photobucket.com]
It’s good we had Jones today this 4 runs help us over a hundred.
It’s a pity he wasn’t put on to bowl earlier in the Notts innings.
Kieswetter bld Adams.
The bowler looks happy, well his legs do.
Shafayat bld Trego.
The link to my Photos on Photobucket - [s1152.photobucket.com]Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008:08:06:22:42:00 by Mike BOS.
I have thus decided to be positive myself and cancel my proposed trip to Taunton, for the duration of the Notts. game, anyway.
The last time we were in this situation was in 1977 when we were bowled out by Essex for 90, allowed them to make 340 and then were bowled out again for 137 to lose in two days.
Let's hope that doesn't happen again!!
No rain at the moment.

Absolutely no wind but as I look over the moor I can see some rather large banks of cloud moving up from the South West.
If that makes its way to Taunton it could get very wet.
Everything moving very slowly as there is not a breath of wind.
Very still.
Very quiet,apart from a stray dog barking.
A baby wailing.
The screech of brakes and lamplights blinking.
As I type the postman is making his way lazily up our path,whistling a faraway tune.
He's very willy nilly you know.
He said there was "no question whatsoever," of him reporting Mr Frost. Although the pitch started damp, there had been heavy rain on Tuesday night and, in any event, wickets fell due to swing and very poor batting."
This is the second time this season that our top order have proven to be woefully inadequate in sub-optimal conditions at Taunton (Hants.) On that occasion, we got out of dodge as the pitch dried. But, as TP pointed out to me yesterday, the Notts attack is strong. I would say it's clearly stronger than the Hants reserve team attack that bundled us out in that other game. A recovery is, therefore, likely to be much more difficult.
Perhaps Mr Rose needs to seek out the odd technician or two in the winter who might be able to make a better fist of things against the moving ball - especially if we're going to consider sometimes deliberately watering the wicket, as we did vs Hants (though not, I believe, on this occasion)
As I said in LoL's favourite thread about Taunton the other day, I've generally been more impressed and pleased with our bowlers, than our batsmen this season. And if we're to get out of this, I think it's our bowlers that will do it for us. They'd need to wrap Notts up almost immediately and then bowl Notts out for a sub-150 type total, as I do not expect our batsmen to do well enough to get us out of this without exceptional support from the bowlers.
The second innings of this match would be a very good time for last year's Caddy to rear his meancing head...
Somebody said a while back that if you do leave a bit on it for the bowlers and couple that up with rain and overcast conditions then you're playing a very dangerous game which depends on winning the toss and getting them in.
We've just been unlucky.
We have not gone from a CC winning side to a bunch of losers in the space of a week.
We are still that same side that has thumped everybody off the park for the last two years.
We've just been unlucky,Notts will I'm sure have been giggling like four year olds at Christmas with the thought of bowling yesterday morning.
Let's put things into perspective and stop over reacting.
There is no crisis.
We've just been caught out in the wonderful game that is cricket.
We need to accept that and concentrate on saving this match.
Somebody said a while back that if you do leave a bit on it for the bowlers and couple that up with rain and overcast conditions then you're playing a very dangerous game which depends on winning the toss and getting them in.
We've just been unlucky. "
Jim - is there not an oxymoron here?
Some might suggest that, far from being 'unlucky,' we have rather been hoist by our own petard?

But Pattinson and Shreck are hardly unequivocally better than our batsmen?
In conditions like this we surely need to apply ourselves better?
It's like KP and the Flintoff at six thing and a promise of all guns blazing. Whilst that might be the fashionable philosophy, you have to be very, very, very good to be able to execute such a philiosophy against strong opposition. KP, for instance, has apparently not noticed that South Africa have won this series, primarily on account of far greater discipline (not aggrssion) on the part of their batsmen.
KP urging others to try and play as he does is as potentially disastrous as KP himself trying to play the way others do, just because he's been made captain.
I think we've taken a gamble.
The unlucky part was losing the gamble.
Again.
If we had deliberately watered the pitch - as for Hants - then I'd call that a smack in the face to the bowlers who performed so thoroughly well to run through a batting team like Kent in the last Taunton game.
Whoever won the toss was going to be on top,it's as simple as that.
And it seems that he was the least poor of a bad bunch yesterday, too.
FE has got it sorted,he's the man.
Quote:Re: The run to the tape starts here
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 2008:08:06:10:39:49
Lancs 16 for 3 - all three to Lewry.
Hants-Yorks yet to start.
Durham batting against Kent.
Broad starts for England, so won't turn up at Taunton tomorrow.
I notice that Sidebottom is still at the Oval this morning. But given the facts that a) he's centrally contracted and b) Nott's are only allowed to name one pre-emptive sub, I'm pretty sure there's zero chance of us having to face him too in the second innings here.
Shreck, Adams and Pattinson all bowled to the conditions in the morning session, the umpires suggested we were less able to do so after lunch and our batsmen didn't apply themselves to a very difficult environment particularly carefully.
Marcus and Ian both seemed to be surprised by balls and got through their shots early so popped up catches. Adams was a real handful and got both Craig and Alfonso with balls that fooled them.
If we had won the toss I have no doubt that we would have exploited the conditions in the same way and though on a slightly easier early afternoon pitch we struggled. Once conditions started to mirror those of the morning we took wickets as well.
The pitch inspector suggested that the rain made preparation of the pitch difficult but conditions should have been mamageable by batsmen.

The bowlers really have continued to do the business.
Alfonso looks like a really good pick-up.
Won't be there until the afternoon I'm afraid people so the scorecard will have to tell the tail until then.

Edit: What am I talking about!? 25 balls on average. So he's due now!
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008:08:07:11:52:36 by Frome Exile.
If his average score were 4 and he scored one run every 6.5 balls (which 16 seems to roughly suggest) doesn't that mean he'd face an average of 26 balls?
How can that bonny green ogre look stubborn?
Now the bit about the rabbit...............

I had corrected myself already....honest!
For us, James and Jonah each managed to face down slightly more than half of that amount. And those were our best efforts.
Credit to James that he's managed two decent crease occupations in successive games, whilst others have perished around him.
After the brilliant start by Pete and Alfonso, it seems like a bit of a dissappointment.
But it should still give our batsmen the chance to redeem themselves.
Compares pretty well with Foster's 32 in the Second Division!
It seems that the gamble we took on our pitch that day has turned the guy's career around - he appears to have been regularly in the wickets since torpedoing our first innings.
Sussex 64-1, chasing Lancs` 206.
Yorkshire 236 all out at Hampshire.
So everyone has a bit of batting to do in their second knock.
Quote:AGod
Especially when you consider that the former's top order have, I assume, been quite a lot less productive than Foster's top order have.
Not particularly, AG.
Essex have only Bopara and Gallian past 500 runs. Bopara is averaging 60-odd, but the only other beyond 40 is bowler Chris Wright who has two not outs from five innings.
Quote:AGod
Incidentally, I note that Tomlinson of Hants has another five-wicket haul today.
It seems that the gamble we took on our pitch that day has turned the guy's career around - he appears to have been regularly in the wickets since torpedoing our first innings.
Is this a good point to mention that when I thought (pre-Headingley) that I'd drafted Pattinson into my Fantasy team, I was wrong? It was Tomlinson.
I don't know what Allenby's contractual situation is, but I would be genuinely interested in his coming here, should he come out of contract. He seems to be a guy who is developing well, with bat and ball, in all forms of the game.
Also, If Grockle's worries on the other thread are borne out, we may find ourselves in need of more all-rounders than just Pete and Arul.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008:08:07:13:03:28 by AGod.
Anyway, it's not been fortunate enough to redress my ailing fortunes in the competition.

Looking pretty set too.
Doesn't sound good news about the weather.
We've also had heavy thundery rain here in North London, so I wonder whether that might head south to the Oval?
Forecast for tomorrow?
{praying for blazing sunshine!}
Forecast for Saturday is not at all good (70% chance of rain)
Unbelievably, the draw is now in the equation...

Objective one, deficit deleted for no loss, almost acheived.
I think LoL (who I believe is present today and will be tomorrow?) needs to sidle up to Langer and remind him that he hasn't treated him to a triple century yet this year! By tea tomorrow would do nicely!
Take note.
Have faith.
This one is in the bag.
Believe Big Jim.
I read it in the tea bags.
p.s. can your tea-bags end the prospect of rain on Saturday, Jim?
Don't tell anyone but I've just won an Audi A3.
Excited isn't the word.
Really,it isn't.
Justin Langer playing better in the second innings with 4 runs.
C Shreck lucky not to be out.
C Shreck’s luck runs out lbw Willoughby.
C Read getting inside edge onto his pad off Thomas.
The day cut short with the rain.
We could have had a good lead if it hadn't rained.
The link to my Photos on Photobucket - [s1152.photobucket.com]Well done Mike.
Do you do this for a living?
That's why I didn't do any of the South Africa match I wasn't feeling all that good at the time of the match.
The link to my Photos on Photobucket - [s1152.photobucket.com]So, if they rule against Durham, they may not be so far ahead of us at the end of this group of matches after all.
IF there are any points deduction it is usually the win points.
With Durham and Somerset with the same bonus points a draw or a win by Somerset would put us in front of Durham.
We will have to wait on the pitch inspectors.
The link to my Photos on Photobucket - [s1152.photobucket.com]
Those pictures are at least as good as the ones we see in the papers and other media outlets.
Great stuff,you can be very proud of your hobby.
It's looks like a win by Somerset is the only way we can go in front of Durham.
A correction on the about if we both win we stay level. What I was trying to say is we go in front of Durham if they don't win and Somerset do.
The link to my Photos on Photobucket - [s1152.photobucket.com]Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008:08:08:07:48:48 by Mike BOS.
Still a big ask for Hilda, Trigger and Blackie but they could all do with the runs and the kudos of showing what this front end can do when they are put on their mettle. It would be wonderful to see them all score big while Zander holds up one end in support as well.
If they could put us in a commanding position (250+ ahead?) then Craig and Jonah could have a final belt and then we can stick 'em in and let Charl, Alfonso and Caddy loose!
What a loverly scenario.......ahhhh dreams are made of this!

If the pitch has got a bit damp it won't take long with the covers off for it to dry out.
Let's hope Mr Frost has obliged and now the pitch should be ready for runs.
We have to see the first hour out unscathed,after that we can really build.
They are forecasting a damp day tomorrow so this could be interesting.
Very interesting.
I hear he had to go to Musgrove.
Poor chap,I really hope he's ok.
At least have the grace to let him recover from his painful blow in his hotel room.
Find out where they're staying and get room service to lock his door.
Much kinder.
Is he out there today?
I can't get any commentary.
Or if the forecast that our players have been given for tomorrow is so unutterably bad that we're playing very cautiously because we don't believe any advantage will accrue from the usual attacking approach (and are, therefore, eschewing risk.)

met office is still suggesting heavy rain all day tomorrow.
Therefore, I think we'd best hope that the ball is doing all sorts through the air and something off the pitch. And hope for the kind of low-scoring second half of the game they had at Durham and get it all wrapped up tonight..

Will we ever score another ton again!?
I noticed that Banger had hit a string of boundaries off Ealham. Was he getting carried away with it, Grockle? Or was it just a good ball?
If not, we're in considerable bother, I would suggest?
There's a bit of breeze so there may be something to help the bowler in the air. The pitch doesn't look to be doing anything particularly unpredictable. So I'd say there's a bit of swing but no boomeranging.

After all, 6 fifties is 300; a few other bits and bobs and you're looking at the 250 lead most of us would willingly take.
At Horsham, it's entirely conceivable that - barring some rain - we could have ended up under pressure, partly as a consequence of neither Zander nor Banger converting their 50s into big tons?
Certainly, if you looked at the record of any individual batsmen and saw 13 50s, but no tons, I think most people would say that they need to start converting?
Of course, the most salient point is that most innings will contain some failures within the top six and so, ideally, you want tons to compensate for the odd failure along the way.
What on earth is that about?
I can't conceive of an obvious reason to suddenly promote Craig?
That's the only vaguely logical reason for suddenly promoting Craig above them unless something has gone wrong such as Ian and Pete having tummy bugs or such like? We'd better hope they are healthy to bat...
I think Craig's been sent in to help James settle to be honest and to push the score along without the need for boundary pressure. (The question might be - if James is in such woeful form, why not send Trigger in early in the first place).
Having said that I'd have sent Pete in with that job as CW's running between the wickets isn't all that brilliant. But JL may believe that this is the partnership that has to cement and then he may have PT and IB left over to push the score along should we get anywhere near a total that we would look to capitalise on.
This is the one boys and girls. Craig and James have to stay there and put something together for us to be bale to take anything from this game. We have to bat out the day.

And after Horsham where we lost one batsman in each of the last over before lunch (Zander), last over before tea (Banger) and final over of the day (Pete), I'd guess that such thoughts could be in the minds of Langer/Hurry.
What would you lot say is a defendable fourth innings target? We're 75 ahead now with 7 standing. The general opinion here seems to waver around the 250 mark or a total of 374 from us.

Unless the forecast is one of the most inaccurate ever, it's not going to be blazing sunshine tomorrow. If it stays dry, it's surely likely to be overcast? If we bat until the end of the day, I would expect to be nearly 300 on, which would leave us with every chance, assuming play is possible.
On the other hand, even if we fold up with a lead of 180 half and hour before tea then, if the heavy clouds have started to roll in, we might get plenty of assistance through the air and would probably still not lose. In that circumstance, I'd expect Notts to be maybe something like 90 for 4 or 5 at day's end with Saturday either being non-existant or a bowler's dream.
Let me put it this way, I'd rather be in our position than theirs unless I knew for certain that there'd be no play tomorrow (in which case we cannot reaslistically hope to win.)
Of course, if we get shot out in this session and there is no sign of inclement conditions, then I could see Notts chasing down 200 and claiming the extra half-hour to help them etc..
i think i might stop watching the score it's shreading my nerves
If we are to win the CC we have to come through sticky spells.
Faith.


p.s. this post was written in response to Grockle's description of Ian's shot.
However one could argue that it's even worse to play that shot immediately after watching somebody else do something stupid.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008:08:08:14:44:13 by AGod.
That's asssuming that the lead is as inadequate as it currently appears.
Our bowlers must be really rather ticked off with this...
Anyone can do it when your 200/300 for 2 and the bowlers are wilting.
Hope that we can bat for at least another 2 hours (unlikley) and that forecast for tomorrow is right.
But I'm not holding my breath on the 2 hours front.
The only players who seem to be able to play every ball on it's merit on anything like a regular basis are at 1 and 2 in the line-up. The rest either attack everything or can't get the ball of the square. Their choice of which ball to smack somewhere is also realy really poor and the two problems make for woeful batting like this.

If you can't do that, then you are left with a choice of block or hit?
Something tells me that, if Neil Edwards is able to resume, he will be asked to in the next game.
The batsmen look more in need of extra hands on deck than our SCCC bowlers who have generally been performing well.
Perhaps the man should spend extra time on his batting to see exactly how good he can be?
Well done to the bowlers for giving themselves some semblance of a chance.
If we get out of dodge, those whose role is mainly to bat, owe the others a drink...
Do we hope that the Met Office were right?
Or hope the rain stays away i.e. do we think we can defend this 211?
It wasn't just today, either.
Ian, Craig and Ben all played foolish shots on the day that I went to Horsham.
And we all know about Monday night.
So perhaps you have something there, Wurz.
If it doesn't rain tomorrow, but is heavily overcast, then that opportunity might present itself to Matt tomorrow, though.
What's Jonah's contract situation?
If he's in need of a new one, he really should be on that list of guys that Mr Rose is offering new deals to. He's such a strong competitor.
Had a lovely half hour watching this morning, but to keep 3 young girls amused was going to cost me a fortune in ice cream, so Lyme Regis beckoned...
It's as simple as that.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008:08:08:19:37:23 by Frome Exile.
Sterling work by Caddy as well who seems to have taken up the matle after the Welsh wizard.
It's also good to see that they gave Jonah the ball while his tail was up and he and Thommo got among them. Ohhh what will tomorrow bring? Patchy rain could make this a really interesting finish but consistent downpours could give us some points.

Willoughby had a terrible time facing the fast bowler but seemed OK against the slow bowler.
Caddick started farming the bowling, in this over Willoughby hit the 6th ball of the over off the spinner and went down the pitch trying to take a single.
There was a big shout from the spectators "No no stay there don't run". After that Caddick had a word with him.
The link to my Photos on Photobucket - [s1152.photobucket.com]I see that James Tomlinson, who did for us in the first innings at Taunton back in May, took nine wickets in the match and is now the country`s leading wicket-taker, with 51 at just over 26 a go; yet last season he only played five first-class matches for a miserly haul of 13 wickets.
How times change.
Matt Wood playing a loose shot.
Ct Kieswetter bld Thomas.
Marcus Trescothick hitting 4 runs before playing not such a good shot and getting out.
Andrew Caddick hitting 4 runs.
A Adams only just missing this one.
I wonder what is going to happen tomorrow.
The link to my Photos on Photobucket - [s1152.photobucket.com]This game perfectly sums it up.
If you scored 106 in the first innings of a 20 over or a 40 over or a 50 over game then the result would be all but certain.
You wouldn't draw, you wouldn't win you would lose 99% of the time and be certain of that result at the end of your innings.
In this game 2 and a half days after that innings end, this game could produce any of all three possible results. We could win if the weather stays away but the conditions help the bowlers. Notts could win if the weather stays away and they have long enough and the game could be drawn if the weather comes in (less of an option in the one day formats - the game would have been over on Day 1).
That is the nature of four day cricket - it's a long haul game of chess with bats and balls - even when it's cocked up it isn't over until the large female tests her larynx

Assume the met office are right and push the pedal to the metal tonight?
Or play everything on merit and just hope against hope that the Met Office are wrong?
You decide...
Real answer: get Somerset out first, then seewhat you're chasing. That will be at least 189, which I doubt they'd get tonight in any case. Play as normal tonight, then see what weather and other conditions are in the morning. Notts are well-placed anyway with other games being low-scoring, they don't need to do anything silly tonight.
As for those pads in the last one,what can I say apart from no?They just look wrong,rather like the gimmicky things St Peter(SP)used to come up with in the mid-seventies.
They didn't last long.
I totally agree about the excitement four day cricket can provide,it is quite remarkable that so many of our matches this season have gone to the wire.
It's not raining here yet and it all feels rather still outside.The lights of Wales are as clear as they usually are in the middle of Summer but it is possible to make out some rather large banks of clouds making their way up the channel towards land,reflecting their heavy dark shadows on the water like an ominous foewarning of something nasty and wet.
If we get a dry day it's all up for grabs,whoever wants it the most and is prepared to take the game by the scruff of the neck will be justly rewarded.
Let's hope our boys are up for it and prepared to give it their all and then some more.
The stakes are high.
I feel a Tommy Cooper joke coming on.
But only just.
The heavens look as though they are about to deposit some very very wet stuff and then stay around for a while to view their work.
The first drops are falling right now.
If it's the same in Taunton they'll be lucky to get any play in.
Might be different later on.
I am delaying my decision to go until later, the forecast was the same this morning with the added comment of strong winds and gales near the coast.
The link to my Photos on Photobucket - [s1152.photobucket.com]We'll only need 20 overs...please let us get on the pitch.
Its been raining all night here in weston.
Still i think after being 106 all out JL will probably be happy with the draw and 7/8 points and then in the next couple of days re-group and really go on an all out attack to pick up maximum points against possibly the worst side in both divisions this year surrey.
Then seeing that we have got hampshire away after the surrey game, depending on the pitch i would fancy us to do well at the rose bowl,so a draw today due to the weather mite not be all doom and gloom!!!
It's imperative that we beat a bad Surrey team next week, should the weather permit it.
But the forecast is already less than special for next week, too.
The worry at the minute is that the ECB seem to no longer enforce penalties, no matter how shocking the pitch and Durham are liable to keep picking up wins if they play on the kind of dross that they played on against Kent.
John Holder said that the championship wicket looked no different than the pro 40 wicket used v Somerset!!!
550+ runs scored in 80 overs and then around 400 for the loss of 40 wickets,something does not quite add up there!!
Great swing bowling conditions if they could get on the pitch but don't hold your breath hoping!

At 10.45 the covers are off and the umpires are inspecting at this time.
The link to my Photos on Photobucket - [s1152.photobucket.com]I have not got radio coverage it was on radio Notts news just after 11.O/clock.
The link to my Photos on Photobucket - [s1152.photobucket.com]Any news if Read is going to bat?


The link to my Photos on Photobucket - [s1152.photobucket.com]
The link to my Photos on Photobucket - [s1152.photobucket.com]Guardian said that conditions in the final session yesterday were the easiest of the match and suggested that Notts chucked the wickets away yesterday.
But looks like Patel is going to win it for them today.
Has the rain somehow by-passed Taunton, or is it still on its way?
Be over by 12.30 at this rate anyway
I'm sorry if that upsets anybody.
The link to my Photos on Photobucket - [s1152.photobucket.com]Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008:08:09:11:52:51 by Mike BOS.
Unfortunately, it also shows Wednesday's play with Surrey as a non-starter, at this point.
Let's hope they're wrong!
Quote:Re: The run to the tape starts here
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 09 August, 2008 09:23
Today will be a complete wash-out.
[quote ]Re: The run to the tape starts here
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 09 August, 2008 11:48
.......Probably going to stay dry at Taunton all day now..
Perhaps it might be wise to give up trying to tell us what will happen; and just observe what does?

All my available scorecards have seized up.
.
The link to my Photos on Photobucket - [s1152.photobucket.com]Incidentally, all this rain may be another grave sign for Ian, in that there's a chance that a decision on his place could conceivably be taken purely from a batting point of view, if we think there's so much wet stuff around that we don't need a spinner versus Surrey?
The covers are on, with hoses, expecting big rain. We have drizzle but it is light and the direction of the weather suggests there'll be light most of the next few hours if the water stops. The Captain and Andy Hurry are on at the moment discussing things but no Notts people. It's really black to the West but it isn't coming our way so if you're in Minehead or Watchet you're probably getting tons.
We are getting weather from Wellington heading diagonally across the ground to the M5 and Ilminster and that is mujch more promising. Although I'm not sure our lot want to get out and do something with it.

Sounds like a fraught situation.
Wet ball is unlikely to help the fielding side.
And, from what you say, it sounds unlikely that the pitch would have got wet?
I'm assuming we've had enough.

Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008:08:09:13:23:13 by Grockle.
Hopes raised and then dashed if you're a Notts fan. From our point of view 122 and third will do for now BUT we must win here next week and then go ad stuff them at the Rose Bowl or our 2008 Championship hopes are gone.

My nerves are shattered.
They are still having tea.
The link to my Photos on Photobucket - [s1152.photobucket.com]
I then had to go with my neice to get some things from the chemist.
Everything suddenlly went black and we got absolutely drenched.
It is now raining cats and dogs and very close.
The link to my Photos on Photobucket - [s1152.photobucket.com]I have been wrong before though.
Once.
The link to my Photos on Photobucket - [s1152.photobucket.com]Time to call it a day?
The link to my Photos on Photobucket - [s1152.photobucket.com]Notts played 11 – 133 points
Durham played 10 – 132 points.
Somerset played 10 – 122 points.
Sussex played 11 – 117 points.
Full table :- [content-uk.cricinfo.com]
The link to my Photos on Photobucket - [s1152.photobucket.com]Batting/bowling sporadically good in parts, but the first innings collapse was lamentable & likewise the second innings middle order (lack of) effort.
We seem to have had something of a collective nervous breakdown over the last few weeks, semi akin to those seen in 2004/5.
There must be concern re the performances of Ian Blackwell, James Hildreth, & (dare I say it).........Andy Caddick. I'm not really convinced that the latter still justifies his place, even if he is fit. Bowling just seems too expensive ?
Am I also the only one who finds it irksome that JL only grace's us with an 'official' comment when we have won or had a good day ?
Not sure what's going on at the moment.
Are the undercurrents at risk of pulling us under, or am I painting an unduly gloomy picture ?
Grizzzly
We can't always praise the team all the time, we have to be honest with are selves.
I do think that Justin Langer make some decisions that I don't agree with at time.
Today for instance why open with Caddick when Notts only needed a small amount of runs.
Caddick was hit for over 5 per over in the first inning and 6 in the second.
I Know it is easy for us to criticize but I do wonder at times.
The link to my Photos on Photobucket - [s1152.photobucket.com]
The link to my Photos on Photobucket - [s1152.photobucket.com]Is he past it? Haven't seen enough to say. He took Adams out in usual fashion - but that was after he went for 6 and nearly went for another when he had him caught off a no ball.
But he is 39 and he hasn't bowled a lot. I think he'll go when he feels he can't do it any more but at the moment I believe he is negotiating an extension to his contract for the summer of 2009. On what basis I'm not sure but I expect him to be rested from tomorrow and he will be in the side for Tuesday without doubt.

We `achieved` our 12th wooden spoon as tail-end charlies in the county championship;
Finished seventh in Division Two of the Pro40;
Sixth out of ten in the Southern Conference of the C.& G. and bottom but one in our Twenty20 Cup group.
Now:
We are third in Division One of the county championship, just 11 points behind the leaders with a match in hand and having already twice been top this season;
Reached the quarter-finals of the Friends Provident Trophy;
And only failed to do so in the Twenty20 Cup because both our matches against Glo`shire were washed out.
Give Mr Rose, Mr Langer, Mr Hurry, Mr Gould, Mr Caddick, Mr Hildreth, Mr Blackwell and Co. a break, boys.
Criticism and intelligent suggestions, yes. But not this constant carping that makes me feel some on this site would be happier if we were still at the bottom of the heap, as then there would be yet more opportunity for complaint.
Don't give 'em a break, give 'em a Kit Kat!
"Criticism and intelligent suggestions, yes. But not this constant carping that makes me feel some on this site would be happier if we were still at the bottom of the heap, as then there would be yet more opportunity for complaint."
Thanks for that diatribe CJ-M.
Unfortunately, you miss the point completely.
It's because I'm an ardent supporter, that it hurts to see us under perform.
The point is, we didn't have a hope of achieving anything in 2004-5 for many reasons, not the least of which was that nobody wanted to Captain the team.
Now, through the superb efforts of all concerned, we have a team of immense talent, undoubtedly capable of doing what we have never done before i.e. win the Championship.
However, if we don't/can't make the most of that talent, as has clearly been the case over the last few weeks, then it's not unreasonable to ponder why.
Grizzzly
I don't like being critical either but I do get concerned with the apparent lack of professionalism and application by a number of players.
We have the CC within our grasp an we need a united team to achieve it.
Amongst any group of fans at any club in any sport in the world there'll always be the grumblers,it's a fact of life.
I don't see very many here though to be fair,I think that we're in the main simply concerned with what appears a sudden lack of discipline and standards.
The thing which struck so many of us over the last few years was the togetherness the lads showed.
It would be dreadful and damaging if that has been ripped apart.
Let's have faith it can be sorted.
It hasn't been the best of weeks in the office and it hasn't been the worst either.
We're still in there fighting.
Let's get it back together and show the world that we really are worthy winners of the County Championship.
Quote:Grizzzly
Quote:
"Criticism and intelligent suggestions, yes. But not this constant carping that makes me feel some on this site would be happier if we were still at the bottom of the heap, as then there would be yet more opportunity for complaint."
Thanks for that diatribe CJ-M.
Unfortunately, you miss the point completely.
It's because I'm an ardent supporter, that it hurts to see us under perform.
The point is, we didn't have a hope of achieving anything in 2004-5 for many reasons, not the least of which was that nobody wanted to Captain the team.
Now, through the superb efforts of all concerned, we have a team of immense talent, undoubtedly capable of doing what we have never done before i.e. win the Championship.
However, if we don't/can't make the most of that talent, as has clearly been the case over the last few weeks, then it's not unreasonable to ponder why.
Grizzzly
Great post, Grizzly.
But, sorry, 106 all out in the first innings of a Championship is not the performance of the winners of said Championship and nothing I could say to lessen the blow or give the people who take responsibility for these things 'a break' will make that less of a fact.
We were saved by the weather in this game. Had it not rained today Notts would have walked this match. We might have given them a better fight of it if we hadn't lost the last session on another day but we would still have been playing catch-up.
I watched all our home 20/20's and we were hardly ever in the driving seat after Justin and Marcus were out. A side that loses half it's matches should not be in the quarter final. It had nothing to do with the weather.
We have a side that can beat anyone in any competition but saying it like it is isn't 'carping'. If you see a different picture of things when you watch them play then post it or use it to question what others say.
People are asking questions about why things aren't firing. They have the right to because I personally agree with them - they aren't
I'd love to give Mr Blackwell for one a break.
Maybe you should write a letter to Mr Langer and Mr Rose and give them the same advice because I can't for the life of me see why our best slow bowler in the one day matches isn't playing. Are they in the right because they aren't mentioning the reasons then? Because they aren't 'carping'?
What I do know is that the situation we see has absolutely nothing to do with anything I or any other poster on this site has written.
I can't say that James plays wonderful shots but is unlucky to get out when what I see is a headless chicken shot when he's finally got himself in and has no need to do it.
I have trouble talking about the brilliant captaincy of a man I admire when I see Craig Kieswetter coming in at number 8 in a 20/20 game we are losing or Peter Trego being left fiddling in the dressing room while other batsmen burn at a time when he had the best one day batting record in the side.
I struggle with Mr Rose when I read 'I'm in charge and this is my plan' but I see someone else's agenda working in the physical world of Somerset cricket. Sorry, but I set up this site to say what I see and I personally worry about what I presently see.
We can win the Championship and we have two games to prove it. But everything in the Somerset garden is not rosey and once you sort out the problems and get the vehicle back on the tracks and moving in the right direction then you have to keep it moving and upright. People did that over the last few years but the momentum has to continue with the resources you have and NOT the resources you want.
We won the CC2 championship last year and we came up second in the one dayers. Whooppee! That was last year. Now we have to stay here and that means forward thinking and forward planning and keeping that development going. It doesn't mean sticking our heads in the sand and not rocking the boat and it doesn't mean looking through rosey spectacles and keeping it down to a whisper if something looks strange.
We've given Rosey and Justin and Andy H (don't remember him being particularly part of conversations on here actually) and Ian and James and Andy C their 'breaks' but it's two thirds of the way through the season and we did not win the 20/20 and we were SECOND 2 points behind Yorkshire before the break in the Championship.
We have little chance of doing much in the Pro40 given present form and we've just pulled 7 points out of a draw at home with the leaders to stay in third place. Another hour and a half and we would have been on 118 with Notts a long way away
Sorry mate but the glass can be half empty as well as half full and if you don't say it early then the fluid can drain away through a hole that gets bigger and bigger over time.
With luck and application we will beat Notts tomorrow and improve our Pro 40 standings and we'll stuff Surrey and Hampshire and stay front runners in the CC. And I for one will be crowing about it when I see those masterful performances.
But please don't come on here in two weeks time if we haven't and try and blame it on the intelligent and informed debate that takes place here.
If the place smells of fish and someone mentions the fishy smell then you can't blame them later for the pong I'm afraid. You smell fish, you mention it and someone sorts out said pong - or it smells out the whole place at a later date.
Ohhh and it's a free and open forum. So carp all you want about the carping - you have every right to.

Edited 5 time(s). Last edit at 2008:08:10:00:46:22 by Grockle.

You request that, if things go badly over the next two weeks, I don`t come on site and blame this debate - not that I would dream of doing so.
Yet you conclude by reiterating that this is a `free and open forum,` and that it allows me `carp all you want about the carping.`
I think they used to call it in the Army `getting your retaliation in first.`
You call it 'carping' and I call it 'informed speculation'. But if you want to call it 'carping' (maybe I should have put it in inverted commas) then you are entirely at liberty to come on and call it that. You'll probably get the same passionate defence next time as well.
We are not causing the problems by talking about them. So I suggested (no more than that) that it was a wrong tack to take to imply that this debate is in some way creating negative vibes or poor performances on the pitch. I is simply talking about observed actions.
I've already dealt with the posters who suggested that debating these things was in some way disloyal to the club (an old PA argument which we had no truck with then either).
I understand your point and maybe we should talk about the batting of Marcus and the constant bowling of Charl and the up and coming performances of Arul or the agressive will to win of Steffan a little more. But we are still in a limbo of performance as a team and should recognise the implications of that for this season and beyond. I doubt our postive spin on the situation would have any more effect on what seems to be going on (nothing has been confirmed or denied at this point).
But it gets the posting juices going doesn't it?

Therefore calling it 'carping' I deem as unfair and needing defence.

First, there's the obvious caveat of what others do in their games.
But even if results elsewhere go against us, I'd have thought that one win and one high scoring draw would certainly keep us in contention?
Now, to do that, the batting needs to buck up and - in particular - somebody needs to take it upon themself to make a big ton rather than making 50 odd and then getting out.
I don't think anyone here would swap where we are now for where we were in 2006.
But I think it's misleading to paint a picture of a rose garden in all areas.
CC - vastly improved and still doing relatively well.
One day stuff?
Improved compared to 2006, certainly, but then that was a nadir in all forms of the game.
Compared to Coxy's team, I'd say the one-day product is inferior.
Certainly, I think you'd struggle to find any other SCCC fan who would seriously support the contention that we should have expected to qualify for the T20 quarters, if not for rain vs Gloucs. What makes you at all sure we would have beaten Gloucs, may I ask?
Certainly, there's no way that we merited a QF place in the T20.
I do think there's an undertone at times, with some of the cynics suggesting that those of us who try and see the positives are naiive fools: and that from some, that undertone is aggresively condascending.
I personally will actively respond to any poster who suggests that we should not discuss issues to do with the club either positive or negative because of the effect of those discussions may have. We don';t have that influence or we would change things and we don't.
This site was set up to discuss Somerset cricket and will not be muffled by the officials or other posters because it offends their personal views of decorum or cricketing etiquette.
Some of these views of what should and shouldn't be talked about need dispelling in a modern setting. The days of the 'us' and 'them', gentlemen and players, management and playing staff relationships of the 50's and 60's have gone I'm afraid. It's not just the format of the game that has changed.
Apologies if stating that sometimes seems condescending but it is the one of the main functions of Grockles and maybe it is because it seems to be stating the 'bleeding obvious' to point it out.
There are times when we have to be careful but there are also times when we are the only place talking about the 'elephant in the room'.
Butimplications of 'disloyalty' or 'whinging' will be vigourously defended and if some people feel the manner is condescending then apologies from me for one. Won't stop me stating it again in the future if need be though.

And just for the record, I've never tried to (nor could I) muffle anyone, or suggest that they should be muffled. Nor have I suggested that any subject should be off-limits because of loyalty or etiquette. The only thing I've ever felt posters should be more considerate of, is the effect that what they say can and does have on one group; the players they claim to support.
And a nice Pro40 Chaser this evening, too!
Here's to better days!

