Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Trigger's first five
By Grockle et al
April 20 2012
Peter Trego's first Somerset five fer was just what the side needed with the loss of Philander to whatever 'injury' or interference kept him from the pitch. As a new ball bowler he took the Notts batting line-up apart and despite the usual and frustrating defiance from Chris Read Somerset took them out for 162. Now we need a batting performance that puts this game out of the home side's reach. A hobbling Trescothick isn't what we wanted however.
v NOTTINGHAMSHIRE CC1 @ Trent Bridge Thursday 19 April 2012
Marcus Trescothick has no real bowling options returning to the fold for this encounter. Adam Dibble's injury will keep him out for longer than expected and the one that has sidelined Gemaal Hussain is not going to be sorted any time soon. Therefore he has to look towards Craig Meschede and Lewis Gregory for seam support. Peter Trego has hopefully now got himself into first class form after his heroics in the second Edgbaston innings that nearly took the game from Warwickshire. The batting? Well that has some way to go yet and we may look to Nick Compton once more to hold the "Wobbly Six" together.
The Somerset side will include;
Trescothick, Suppiah, Compton, Hildreth, Kieswetter, Buttler, Trego, Dockrell, Kirby
plus two of the players mentioned.
This is because it seems that Vernon Philander has picked up a slight back 'niggle' and will be rested for this game to protect his back and ensure we get the most out of him for the resat of his stay. At least that is the Somerset stance. The South African medical team's stance is that he is being rested for this game - which was agreed and will only play two game spells with a rest on the third. Somerset deny this is an official agreement. I personally don't care. The man is either a Somerset bowler or he can take a long rest before the Test series or go home for a while and come back with the team he plays for. If he is not at Taunton to play cricket when required for Somerset then he can leave on the next train to London or wherever in this writer's opinion.
However, it may be a chance to shine for one of the younger home developed. One would expect Craig Meschede to still hold the front postion on the selection list but Lewis Gregory is also expected to take a place in the side. A new ball attack of Steve Kirby and Pete Trego is not what we expected to field at Trent Bridge but that is what we have and we'll have to do the best with it we can.
And the best of it we made!! Pete cut through the front end of Notts batting line-up like the proverbial knife. In between the rain of a shortened first day, the Mighty Trigger took out former teammate Neil Edwards and Lumb before they got to 15. Craig Meschede once again celebrated his first change status with Hales' wicket before the man of the moment got a third when Patel fliped on to Arul and Notts were reeling at 20 for 4!!
Kirby removed Taylor and Lewis skittled Mullaney in between the rain drops and while Read held up one end and passed 50, his side finished the first day on 93 for 6!!
Day 2
Would Notts get to three figures? Well Trigger was keen to ensure that would not be the case and Franks obliged by becoming his fourth wicket at 97, however Ben Phillips got over the 100 before he was caught behind to give the Somerset allrounder his first Championship five fer (can you believe that?) at 101. Fletcher became Kirbs' second victim at 106 and we all hoped for a BIG first innings score. But Gurney and that man Read stubbornly held out for over 50 runs before we finished them off as Gurney was castled by Steve K with the score on 162 and the Notts wicketkeeper the owner of an excellent ton (104) for his county.
Unfortunately Marcus Trescothick went over on that dubious ankle just before the home side were dismissed and he did not open for his team. Instead Lewis Gregory strided out with Arul to start the innings. This seems to make sense just before kunch on Day 2. Lewis has opened before and with Nick being so important presently at number 3 it was a decent decision. But could the batting, that has been less than robust, make the most of the position it had been presented with by the bowlers, especially Trego's 5 for 53 in 20 overs?
Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Grockles.com (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 14:17
What do you think? You can have your say by posting below.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.
Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 2012:04:25:13:31:07 by Grockle.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.
Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 2012:04:25:13:31:07 by Grockle.
Somerset in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 18/04/2012 05:04
The start of the conversation about our CC1 trip to Trent Bridge for the four day match.
Let's hope the end product of the trip is a little more welcome than that Birmingham experience. Match report thread with links to come though I'm starting to think I'll just let the thread tell the story rather than trying to summarise the comments made.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012:04:18:10:32:34 by Grockle.
Let's hope the end product of the trip is a little more welcome than that Birmingham experience. Match report thread with links to come though I'm starting to think I'll just let the thread tell the story rather than trying to summarise the comments made.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012:04:18:10:32:34 by Grockle.
Re: Somersete in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 18/04/2012 06:45
Hoping the Met Office forecast is right and the Beeb one wrong.
If Met Office are right, should at least be plenty of play on Fri and Sat.
I don't think much will happen on day one. It's forecast to be thundery with heavy showers, and that would come on top of prolonged rain today and tonight.
I don't think Marcus will be in much doubt as to what to do should he be fortunate enough to win this toss.
If Met Office are right, should at least be plenty of play on Fri and Sat.
I don't think much will happen on day one. It's forecast to be thundery with heavy showers, and that would come on top of prolonged rain today and tonight.
I don't think Marcus will be in much doubt as to what to do should he be fortunate enough to win this toss.
Re: Somersete in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: old boy! (IP Logged)
Date: 18/04/2012 08:56
What would be the ideal outcome??
Somerset 450 - 1 dec
Notts 199 and 250
Somerset Max points Notts none! Job done!!
Somerset 450 - 1 dec
Notts 199 and 250
Somerset Max points Notts none! Job done!!
Re: Somersete in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: Ronniesabre (IP Logged)
Date: 18/04/2012 08:59
like the scenario OB............whats the odds? £1 bet might make you a millionaire.
Re: Somersete in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: Eagle Pete (IP Logged)
Date: 18/04/2012 11:23
We currently have a lack of bowlers, especially with our overseas signing not going to be available every game and likely to miss Trent Bridge! With Alfie on holiday in India, perhaps our Director of Cricket will have some answers for us.
If we win the toss,somebody on the coaching side needs to tell the skipper what to do in April conditions, that most people associated with cricket already know.
If we win the toss,somebody on the coaching side needs to tell the skipper what to do in April conditions, that most people associated with cricket already know.
Re: Somersete in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: West Country Gooner (IP Logged)
Date: 18/04/2012 11:53
Great, The lack of Philander is the last thing we need right now.
Re: Somersete in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: just in (IP Logged)
Date: 18/04/2012 11:56
If you are saying that our os is missing this match, our seam attack looks like Kirby, Trego, Gregory and Meschede...somewhat untested!
Re: Somersete in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: Ronniesabre (IP Logged)
Date: 18/04/2012 12:18
is this correct? Philander is missing this game? And he is going home earlier than planned?
What is going on?
What is going on?
Re: Somersete in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: nelliec (IP Logged)
Date: 18/04/2012 12:20
Philander in squad of 12 .Gregory in but dibble has an injury and will be sidelined for a while. Main site says either Gregory or Meschede will probably start.
Re: Somerset in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: Railboy (IP Logged)
Date: 18/04/2012 12:29
I have searched all the sources of imformation i can think of, and not one of them makes even the remotest mention of Vernon being unavailable.
Inventing imformation for the purposes of scaremongering should not be tolerated on this site.
Inventing imformation for the purposes of scaremongering should not be tolerated on this site.
Re: Somerset in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 18/04/2012 12:32
I'll be quite surprised if both men do not start.
Given the forecast (suggesting that it will be a 3 day game at best) and the sheer volume of rain predicted to fall before the game, it would seem perverse to include George Dockrell, his brilliant effort vs Middx notwithstanding?
I, personally, would play both men, even if Lewis isn't fit to bowl at all.
Given the forecast (suggesting that it will be a 3 day game at best) and the sheer volume of rain predicted to fall before the game, it would seem perverse to include George Dockrell, his brilliant effort vs Middx notwithstanding?
I, personally, would play both men, even if Lewis isn't fit to bowl at all.
Re: Somerset in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 18/04/2012 12:38
It is bad news re: Dibble. An intercostal injury meaning that he will be out for several weeks, apparently.
The site claims that either Craig M or Lewis will play "depending on an assessment of conditions."
I wonder if this implies that Lewis is not fit to bowl and would play as a specialist batsmen?
Otherwise, it's difficult to see what conditions would tend to lead to the selection of Craig M and which would tend to lead instead to the selection of Lewis?
Perhaps George D is nailed onto start. But if he plays, I would not be surprised to see him only bowl 10-15 overs in the entire match.
The site claims that either Craig M or Lewis will play "depending on an assessment of conditions."
I wonder if this implies that Lewis is not fit to bowl and would play as a specialist batsmen?
Otherwise, it's difficult to see what conditions would tend to lead to the selection of Craig M and which would tend to lead instead to the selection of Lewis?
Perhaps George D is nailed onto start. But if he plays, I would not be surprised to see him only bowl 10-15 overs in the entire match.
Re: Somerset in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: Ronniesabre (IP Logged)
Date: 18/04/2012 12:39
I agree Railboy!!
AG your preferred team would seriously strengthen the batting too!!
AG your preferred team would seriously strengthen the batting too!!
Re: Somerset in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 18/04/2012 12:40
I note that Marcus mentions that in previous trips to Trent Bridge we've been "unlucky," to come up against Stuart Broad.
Personally, I'm always more concerned about Andre Adams. He certainly caused massive problems at Taunton last season. And he also bowled better than Broad in the first innings at Trent Bridge last season (at least for the first 80 or so overs of the innings.)
Marcus has also confirmed what our eyewitnesses have said - namely that he is "scratching around for form."
Personally, I'm always more concerned about Andre Adams. He certainly caused massive problems at Taunton last season. And he also bowled better than Broad in the first innings at Trent Bridge last season (at least for the first 80 or so overs of the innings.)
Marcus has also confirmed what our eyewitnesses have said - namely that he is "scratching around for form."
Re: Somerset in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: Ronniesabre (IP Logged)
Date: 18/04/2012 12:46
I suspect that Dibble's injury must be a recurrence of what he had before (its not just seen main site). If that is the case then its a case of trying to get them fit before they are actually ready....Hussain being the same. He will need to get back pronto!!
Down to the bare bones outside the front line seamers now.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012:04:18:12:49:12 by Ronniesabre.
Down to the bare bones outside the front line seamers now.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012:04:18:12:49:12 by Ronniesabre.
Re: Somerset in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 18/04/2012 12:50
Marcus says that "All young seamers seem to get injured nowadays," and opines that it almost seems that they have to do a certain amount of bowling before they get to the point where they become resistant to injury.
I've paraphrased the last bit.
I've paraphrased the last bit.
Re: Somerset in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: cricketjerry-mouse (IP Logged)
Date: 18/04/2012 16:36
Nottinghamshire have added seamer Harry Gurney, recruited from Leicestershire during the winter, to their squad for Trent Bridge.
Former Somerset players Neil Edwards and Ben Phillips, who have both made useful starts to the season, remain among the 12 up for selection:
Edwards, Hales, Lumb, Samit Patel, Taylor, Read, Franks, Phillips, Fletcher, Adams, Carter, Gurney.
Former Somerset players Neil Edwards and Ben Phillips, who have both made useful starts to the season, remain among the 12 up for selection:
Edwards, Hales, Lumb, Samit Patel, Taylor, Read, Franks, Phillips, Fletcher, Adams, Carter, Gurney.
Re: Somerset in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: old boy! (IP Logged)
Date: 18/04/2012 17:13
Quote:AGod
Marcus says that "All young seamers seem to get injured nowadays," and opines that it almost seems that they have to do a certain amount of bowling before they get to the point where they become resistant to injury.
I've paraphrased the last bit.
I remember 50 odd years ago in my late teens and early twenties as a pretty quick seamer playing for Taunton and probably because I didn't really finish growing completely until my mid-twenties. Twinges and muscle problems were common and needed some careful handling. However, at club level one tended to play through the pain, but that would not be possible for young professionals then or now.
Re: Somerset in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: Clarence Parker (IP Logged)
Date: 18/04/2012 19:01
What's wrong with the 'magic sponge', cold water and a good helping of horse liniment rubbed in, old boy?
When the late ‘Dicky’ Holman was the club masseur, he worked wonders with nothing more sophisticated than just that.
And he was a lovely man too. Does anyone else remember him?
When the late ‘Dicky’ Holman was the club masseur, he worked wonders with nothing more sophisticated than just that.
And he was a lovely man too. Does anyone else remember him?
Re: Somerset in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: Grizzers (IP Logged)
Date: 18/04/2012 19:25
Maybe SCCC should invest in a tin or two of Ralgex ?
Grizzzly
Grizzzly
Re: Somerset in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: Wickham (IP Logged)
Date: 18/04/2012 21:01
Yes, I remember him, CP. Those were the days!
Re: Somerset in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: Clarence Parker (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 09:19
I will tell you now before the game gets underway - "We are all doomed - doomed I tell ya."
I saw Old Frazer last night, and that is what he told me - so it must be true.
I saw Old Frazer last night, and that is what he told me - so it must be true.
Re: Somerset in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: old boy! (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 09:47
Don't panic, don't panic - I agree with L/C Jones!
Re: Somerset in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 09:51
If a physio came onto the field of play and treated players like they used to....duw duw that magic sponge didn't half smart at times, then there's a good chance they'd end up on the register.
As the Daily Mail so frequently tell us, it's that health and safety gone wrong....illegal immigrants....chav culture....magic sponges....health and safety at its worst.
As the Daily Mail so frequently tell us, it's that health and safety gone wrong....illegal immigrants....chav culture....magic sponges....health and safety at its worst.
Re: Somerset in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 09:56
And don't forget that they had a part in the death of Diana as well... that magic sponge with something else on it rubbed on the driver!
Re: Somerset in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 10:05
Oh yes, I'd forgotten about that.
It's health and safety gone wrong, we wouldn't have had this nonsense in Maggie's day.
It's health and safety gone wrong, we wouldn't have had this nonsense in Maggie's day.
Re: Somerset in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: barndoorio (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 10:39
Just seen a Tweet from Dougie Brown saying that Andy Sutton is in our squad for todays game, not seen that anywhere else.
Though the forecast suggests we may not find out our team for a few days yet!
Though the forecast suggests we may not find out our team for a few days yet!
Re: Somerset in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 10:43
Dougie Brown as in the former Warwickshire player?
Does he have a media gig now then as a journo?
If true, may mean Lewis has been deemed not fit to bowl?
Does he have a media gig now then as a journo?
If true, may mean Lewis has been deemed not fit to bowl?
Re: Somerset in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: nelliec (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 10:46
start delayed according to cricinfo.
Re: Somerset in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 10:55
Sounds a bit grim oop North today.
Re: Somerset in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: SheptonPaul (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 10:55
...and I see that George Dobell is also at Trent Bridge - is that the third Somerset game he'll have seen this season? He clearly knows The Team to Watch (c).
Re: Somerset in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: geordie moonraker (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 11:00
Nottingham isn't "oop north" it's the top end of the midlands. Newcastle has clouds as far as the eye can (can't) see after torrential rain yesterday. I'm glad I've got tickets for the theatre this afternoon
Re: Somerset in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: Ronniesabre (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 11:00
I read that the team would be finalsed after considering one or two "unspecified" injuries. Sutton may have been called up as cover in case!!!
Re: Somerset in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: JonR (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 11:14
Quote:SheptonPaul
...and I see that George Dobell is also at Trent Bridge - is that the third Somerset game he'll have seen this season? He clearly knows The Team to Watch (c).
A couple of weeks ago he tweeted that he followed Somerset whilst growing up, so he must be using his new found influence at Cricinfo to get himself reacquainted with the team!
Re: Somerset in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: Railboy (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 11:17
Quote:geordie moonraker
Nottingham isn't "oop north" it's the top end of the midlands. Newcastle has clouds as far as the eye can (can't) see after torrential rain yesterday. I'm glad I've got tickets for the theatre this afternoon
Bristol is "oop north" Nottingham is in Scotland isn't it? As for Newcastle, do you get 24 hours of daylight yet?
Re: Somerset in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: geordie moonraker (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 11:19
Not until June !!
Re: Somerset in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: Railboy (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 11:28
Must be hard preparing wickets with all that permafrost!
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: NW5Somerset (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 11:36
Play due to begin at 12. Lunch at 1 with Tea at 4
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: NW5Somerset (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 11:36
No Andre Adams!!
Notts team: Hales, Edwards, Lumb, Patel, Taylor, Read, Mullaney, Franks, Phillips, Fletcher, Gurney
Notts team: Hales, Edwards, Lumb, Patel, Taylor, Read, Mullaney, Franks, Phillips, Fletcher, Gurney
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 11:42
Huge, MASSIVE blow for Notts.
That should give our guys some injection of confidence.
I get the impression that Big Ben has started the season well and suspect he will be a handful.
Fletcher bowled well with the new ball on the first day of the corresponding fixture last season.
That should give our guys some injection of confidence.
I get the impression that Big Ben has started the season well and suspect he will be a handful.
Fletcher bowled well with the new ball on the first day of the corresponding fixture last season.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: JonR (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 11:46
Huge blow for us too as Big Vern is out with a sore back. Does this mean Andy Sutton will play?
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: JonR (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 11:47
Our George has confirmed it on the Cricinfo live blog.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: cricketjerry-mouse (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 11:48
Dougie Brown is the professional at Barnt Green in the Midlands, where Andy Sutton played his club cricket last summer.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: JonR (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 11:48
No Sutton, so Gregory and Meschede will play:
ME Trescothick*, AV Suppiah, NRD Compton, JC Hildreth, C Kieswetter†, JC Buttler, PD Trego, L Gregory, CAJ Meschede, GH Dockrell, SP Kirby
ME Trescothick*, AV Suppiah, NRD Compton, JC Hildreth, C Kieswetter†, JC Buttler, PD Trego, L Gregory, CAJ Meschede, GH Dockrell, SP Kirby
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Railboy (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 11:51
Begger me!! Looks like I may have to eat some humble pie servrd up by Eagle Pete
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: NW5Somerset (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 11:51
Vernon out injured??
Very dubious.
Very dubious.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Ronniesabre (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 11:53
so technically we are without our 4 seamers. Thomas/Philander/Dibble/Hussain. It wasnt meant to be like this!!!
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: NW5Somerset (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 11:54
No mention of any injury at all yesterday - must have happened this morning.
Nothing on his Twitter feed (usually a good indicator)
Nothing on his Twitter feed (usually a good indicator)
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Ronniesabre (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 11:55
I hope its not a Mendis type back injury!!!!
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: samaithai2 (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 11:56
Be like Wigan folks. Have faith in Buddha.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 11:59
Suspect there's nowt wrong with Philander.
It could be that he has a very slight niggle, I guess. But suspect it is more likely that Brian has agreed with Kirsten to restrict his usage.
It could be that he has a very slight niggle, I guess. But suspect it is more likely that Brian has agreed with Kirsten to restrict his usage.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 12:01
Seam attack looks really thin.
Who takes the new ball with Kirby?
Surprised that we've picked George on what is usually a seamers paradise but may have very little choice if nobody else is available in terms of either an extra batsman or extra seamer?
Let's hope that George's selection means there is likely to be something in it for spin
Who takes the new ball with Kirby?
Surprised that we've picked George on what is usually a seamers paradise but may have very little choice if nobody else is available in terms of either an extra batsman or extra seamer?
Let's hope that George's selection means there is likely to be something in it for spin
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Mike TA1 (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 12:02
Quote:NW5Somerset
Vernon out injured??
Very dubious.
I wonder what we will be told!
Edit - It appears that Cricket South Africa have had a hand in the absence of Philander from this game. Just two games into the season, they were already uneasy about the demands upon him. He might well have proved hugely demanding in these conditions.
Thanks for the Cricinfo link above
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012:04:19:12:07:28 by Mike TA1.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: uncle morpheus (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 12:02
Tres wins the toss. Notts bat
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 12:05
'Technically' It's 3 Ron. Alf isn't a Somerset player at the moment and we knew that in advance.
As for Mr 'Mendis' we didn't play him because he wasn't up to it in England. I doubt that is the assessment of VP.
However, should it be shown (by anyone but AG) that this 'injury' is an unsubtle way of not giving us the real reason for him not playing then not only will I have to say AG was right but also suggest we don't sign internationals in the future because the spending is a total waste of resources if we can't use them in situations where they are most important.
Well if the boys want an opportunity to shine, then here it is!!
As for Mr 'Mendis' we didn't play him because he wasn't up to it in England. I doubt that is the assessment of VP.
However, should it be shown (by anyone but AG) that this 'injury' is an unsubtle way of not giving us the real reason for him not playing then not only will I have to say AG was right but also suggest we don't sign internationals in the future because the spending is a total waste of resources if we can't use them in situations where they are most important.
Well if the boys want an opportunity to shine, then here it is!!
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Ronniesabre (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 12:09
well there we have it.
Apparently George Dobell has reported that SA have had a hand in VP missing this game as they were already uneasy at his workload. Of all games he would have been demannding in it was this and we cant play him.
What's the point really?
Apparently George Dobell has reported that SA have had a hand in VP missing this game as they were already uneasy at his workload. Of all games he would have been demannding in it was this and we cant play him.
What's the point really?
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: JonR (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 12:10
Mr Dobell has suggested that on the Circinfo blog that Cricket South Africa have indeed had a hand in Vern's absence for the game.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Clarence Parker (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 12:14
Fred Karno's Army comes to mind.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 12:15
Well if that is true Mike then the portents of doom I went head to head with AG about were correct and Philander is an absolute waste of money!
Does that mean that after his efforts in the first game his seeming less effective second game was an indication of the poor boy crumbling under the effort?
Seems you were on the right track AG and Somerset are kowtowing to the demands of an international body. Can only suggest they stop using our league as a preparation point for their internationals in future and VP is the last bowling foreign international we consider.
I suppose it is still not confirmed that this is the reason but it seems far more likely than it did a few weeks ago.
Seminal moment in UK cricket history I think and deeply disappointing.
Does that mean that after his efforts in the first game his seeming less effective second game was an indication of the poor boy crumbling under the effort?
Seems you were on the right track AG and Somerset are kowtowing to the demands of an international body. Can only suggest they stop using our league as a preparation point for their internationals in future and VP is the last bowling foreign international we consider.
I suppose it is still not confirmed that this is the reason but it seems far more likely than it did a few weeks ago.
Seminal moment in UK cricket history I think and deeply disappointing.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 12:17
Quote:Grockle
'Technically' It's 3 Ron. Alf isn't a Somerset player at the moment and we knew that in advance.
As for Mr 'Mendis' we didn't play him because he wasn't up to it in England. I doubt that is the assessment of VP.
However, should it be shown (by anyone but AG) that this 'injury' is an unsubtle way of not giving us the real reason for him not playing then not only will I have to say AG was right but also suggest we don't sign internationals in the future because the spending is a total waste of resources if we can't use them in situations where they are most important.
Well if the boys want an opportunity to shine, then here it is!!
There is also a third way here, Grockle.
There could be a very, very slight injury, the like of which Caddy and Willow would have bowled through every day and the like of which Vernon would be happy to bowl through (if permitted by his board).
In other words, an 'injury,' may be all a matter of degree rather than a matter of fabrication.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: old boy! (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 12:19
Quote:Grockle
'Technically' It's 3 Ron. Alf isn't a Somerset player at the moment and we knew that in advance.
As for Mr 'Mendis' we didn't play him because he wasn't up to it in England. I doubt that is the assessment of VP.
However, should it be shown (by anyone but AG) that this 'injury' is an unsubtle way of not giving us the real reason for him not playing then not only will I have to say AG was right but also suggest we don't sign internationals in the future because the spending is a total waste of resources if we can't use them in situations where they are most important.
Well if the boys want an opportunity to shine, then here it is!!
I can only assume that BR has deliberately kept quite about Philander's "ban" so that it didn't influence Notts selection??
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: SheptonPaul (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 12:20
Fair point AG - I think unless we get something "official" from BR or similar, it's all just speculation - albeit very disappointing whatever the explanation!
At least Marcus won a toss - now let's have the bowlers we have on the park do their bit!
At least Marcus won a toss - now let's have the bowlers we have on the park do their bit!
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: West Country Gooner (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 12:20
So the vibes yesterday were accurate and the reason predictable and depressing. In for a hard time I suspect After 2 GAMES !
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 12:21
Quote:Grockle
Well if that is true Mike then the portents of doom I went head to head with AG about were correct and Philander is an absolute waste of money!
Does that mean that after his efforts in the first game his seeming less effective second game was an indication of the poor boy crumbling under the effort?
Seems you were on the right track AG and Somerset are kowtowing to the demands of an international body. Can only suggest they stop using our league as a preparation point for their internationals in future and VP is the last bowling foreign international we consider.
I suppose it is still not confirmed that this is the reason but it seems far more likely than it did a few weeks ago.
Seminal moment in UK cricket history I think and deeply disappointing.
I certainly never contended that Vernon would be a "waste of money." There's a view that could be taken that 3 or 4 games of him is better than 6 or 7 of A N Other ordinary overseas bowler.
It IS though partly why I was so annoyed at not beating Warks, I'm afraid. We all knew that Philander's stint was not scheduled to be a long one. And I personally suspected that it would involve fewer games than we had been led to believe it might.
I'm going up there tomorrow, staying overnight, hoping to see play on Saturday too.
Of course, I would have loved to have seen Philander 'in the flesh.'
However, I would submit that watching the likes of Craig M and Lewis will be far more relevant to the future of SCCC and, indeed, more "interesting," from that point of view so I shall content myself with that.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012:04:19:12:23:55 by AGod.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Ronniesabre (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 12:29
if SA had been playing today he would have played............thats what I'm taking from all this.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 12:30
Neil gone. Well done, Pete.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: nelliec (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 12:38
Andre Adams missing for Notts is also a huge blow for them.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: barndoorio (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 12:40
Trego has taken 5 of our last 6 wickets hasn't he?
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 12:40
Lumb gone too. Two for Pete.
Given the marked lack of success that SCCC had with the new ball last season, then one wonders if Pete might be out to carve out a new niche for himself...
Given the marked lack of success that SCCC had with the new ball last season, then one wonders if Pete might be out to carve out a new niche for himself...
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 12:41
Quote:barndoorio
Trego has taken 5 of our last 6 wickets hasn't he?
Sounds right to me.
We are one wicket away from a bonus point and no other Div 1 team has so much as left the pavilion (apart from Notts, of course.)
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Railboy (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 12:42
Vernon who???? We have our own new ball weapon thank you very much - Tregos on for a tenfer!!
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Tumbles (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 12:43
A pre lunch ramble of Treeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeego.. never a bad thing.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 12:48
I see Mr Dobell is wondering whether SCCC fans wish that Charl had been retained.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 12:50
Craig M at first change.
Will be interesting to see how much Lewis is going to bowl?
Will be interesting to see how much Lewis is going to bowl?
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 12:52
Delighted to hear that Marcus is fielding a third man and has done throughout. Apparently, they had yet to see one at Trent Bridge this season.
It is probably my number one bug-bear. I HATE seeing numerous edges go for four.
Yardy played without one at Hove last season when they put us in in very difficult conditions and we made a HUGE number of runs from edges through there.
It is probably my number one bug-bear. I HATE seeing numerous edges go for four.
Yardy played without one at Hove last season when they put us in in very difficult conditions and we made a HUGE number of runs from edges through there.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 12:53
Bye bye, Hales. HELLO first bowling point.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: barndoorio (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 12:54
Meschede! you've ruined Pete's Double Michelle.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Mike TA1 (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 12:54
I am going to concentrate on who's playing in this game.
A good start by Pete T and Craig M.
A good start by Pete T and Craig M.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Tumbles (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 12:58
Surely we can get them all out before lunch. Chop chop lads.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 12:58
Story re: Philander apparently is a "back injury."
I guess we'll have to take that at face value.
BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY PETER TREGO HAS STRUCK AGAIN.
BJ..... Are you still sure that Gimblett is better than Pete? (joke)
I guess we'll have to take that at face value.
BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY PETER TREGO HAS STRUCK AGAIN.
BJ..... Are you still sure that Gimblett is better than Pete? (joke)
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Tumbles (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 13:00
Good to here Pete's listening to me.
Bloody good toss to win...
Bloody good toss to win...
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 13:01
Let's wrap this up by tea, the boys could be in their own beds tonight.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: uncle morpheus (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 13:01
Notts 20 for 4 at lunch. Well done Pete
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Railboy (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 13:02
Seriously - Will Phillander ever get his place back? No, seriously!
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 13:03
20 for 4.
On day one last year, the pitch was almost unplayable in the morning session and we made 48 for 4 from 26 overs. Chris Jones's heroic defiance for 70 minutes drastically reduced the length of time that Hildreth/Kieswetter needed to bat before lunch and they were then able to destroy Notts when play resumed and all the venom had gone out of the track.
No idea whether the same sort of thing will obtain with the pitch this time BUT if it does then it's absolutely pivotal that we have got rid of both of Hales and Patel already. Those are the two that, in my view, are most capable of scoring quickly and batting them into a strong position.. or would have been...
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012:04:19:13:03:28 by AGod.
On day one last year, the pitch was almost unplayable in the morning session and we made 48 for 4 from 26 overs. Chris Jones's heroic defiance for 70 minutes drastically reduced the length of time that Hildreth/Kieswetter needed to bat before lunch and they were then able to destroy Notts when play resumed and all the venom had gone out of the track.
No idea whether the same sort of thing will obtain with the pitch this time BUT if it does then it's absolutely pivotal that we have got rid of both of Hales and Patel already. Those are the two that, in my view, are most capable of scoring quickly and batting them into a strong position.. or would have been...
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012:04:19:13:03:28 by AGod.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Beeamazed (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 13:03
This mid- winter cricket is a joke.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: tonysmalltoes (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 13:03
Sounds like a dodgy shot from Samit, but a great catch from Arul.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 13:04
Quote:beeamazed
This mid- winter cricket is a joke.
Well, the ECB have "got away with it," with back-to-back glorious Aprils in the past two years.
They couldn't expect that good fortune to continue forever.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Ronniesabre (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 13:13
absolutely............Trego on fire!!
6 last week and another 3 today. Someboday has fired him up last Saturday!!
Maybe it was reading this board?
6 last week and another 3 today. Someboday has fired him up last Saturday!!
Maybe it was reading this board?
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Clarence Parker (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 13:14
Although it was an abbreviated one, Somerset won that session.
Let's have as many more as it takes to win the match.
Well done, and to Peter Trego in particular. Don't let them off the hook after lunch please.
Let's have as many more as it takes to win the match.
Well done, and to Peter Trego in particular. Don't let them off the hook after lunch please.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 13:15
I'd imagine Pete has taken a look around him at how few experienced bowlers we have and put it all (or a lot of it) on himself.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: NW5Somerset (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 13:21
1pm: George Dobell at Nottinghamshire v Somerset
We’ve reached lunch at Trent Bridge with Somerset having enjoyed much the better of the morning session: Nottinghamshire are 20-4.
Peter Trego removed both left-handers, Edwards and Lumb, leg before with deliveries that nipped back at them, before Craig Meschede struck with his fourth delivery; Alex Hales wafting without foot movement. The kick of the turf that Hales gave spoke volumes: it was not much of a shot.
Samit Patel went the ball before lunch. Frustrated by some tight bowling, he attempted an oddly aggressive drive only to edge it to point, where he was very well held by a diving Arul Suppiah.
We’ve reached lunch at Trent Bridge with Somerset having enjoyed much the better of the morning session: Nottinghamshire are 20-4.
Peter Trego removed both left-handers, Edwards and Lumb, leg before with deliveries that nipped back at them, before Craig Meschede struck with his fourth delivery; Alex Hales wafting without foot movement. The kick of the turf that Hales gave spoke volumes: it was not much of a shot.
Samit Patel went the ball before lunch. Frustrated by some tight bowling, he attempted an oddly aggressive drive only to edge it to point, where he was very well held by a diving Arul Suppiah.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: NW5Somerset (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 13:22
News on Philander is that he has a minor back injury and is being rested for the Notts match so he can fulfil the rest of his contract.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: NW5Somerset (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 13:23
Definitely something to do with South African pressure then.
Why don't they just say 'minor back injury'? Don't understand why they have to add the contract bit.
Why don't they just say 'minor back injury'? Don't understand why they have to add the contract bit.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 13:25
Presumably the implication is that if we asked Vernon to bowl through it in this match, then SA would aim to rip up the rest of the deal?
All rain has now been expunged from today's forecast and, at the time of typing, most of the rain forecast for tomorrow has also vanished.
All rain has now been expunged from today's forecast and, at the time of typing, most of the rain forecast for tomorrow has also vanished.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 13:42
Looks like we've been lucky then, but the Met Office has removed the rain previously forecast for this afternoon.
That radar suggests that weather is swirling around ... but Nottingham might be in the middle of two bands (in the dry bit.) There's a load of stuff over the West Midlands and some over towards the SE Midlands, by the look of it.
That radar suggests that weather is swirling around ... but Nottingham might be in the middle of two bands (in the dry bit.) There's a load of stuff over the West Midlands and some over towards the SE Midlands, by the look of it.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Bagpuss (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 13:50
Meanwhile Lancs have lost the toss here in Liverpool. Tey face another tough test this afternoon as Warks have put them in to bat
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: old boy! (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 13:51
Great start! But I am always happy when we can shift Chris Read, who is still and has been IMO one of the best and consistent English wicketkeeper/batsmen since he was cynically dropped by England a few years ago.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Bagpuss (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 13:55
Barker bowled Moore off the first ball of his opening over of Lancs innings - but it was a no-ball!
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012:04:19:13:56:52 by Bagpuss.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012:04:19:13:56:52 by Bagpuss.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Bagpuss (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 14:21
P- down. Less lovely stuff.
Both in Nottingham and Liverpool
Both in Nottingham and Liverpool
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Tumbles (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 14:33
Covers off again, seem to be going after the bowlers a bit more.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Grizzers (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 14:50
Great start - well done Trigger !
Hope we can rid ourselves of the irksome Chris Read. He has a horrible habit of doing very well against us.
As for VP - what can you say. His back pain must be nothing in comparison to Brian Rose's long suffering pain in the neck gained from trying to secure a decent overseas player that actually (a) receives visa/approval, (b) turns up, (c) is allowed to play by his domestic board & (d) doesn't get injured !
Grizzzly
Hope we can rid ourselves of the irksome Chris Read. He has a horrible habit of doing very well against us.
As for VP - what can you say. His back pain must be nothing in comparison to Brian Rose's long suffering pain in the neck gained from trying to secure a decent overseas player that actually (a) receives visa/approval, (b) turns up, (c) is allowed to play by his domestic board & (d) doesn't get injured !
Grizzzly
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 14:53
SCCC tweet explains that the Philander absence is because of a minor back niggle. They are resting him in this game in order to hopefully ensure that he can bowl during the rest of his contract.
Makes sense I supose and possibly explains his less effective second innings performance in Brum.
Makes sense I supose and possibly explains his less effective second innings performance in Brum.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: old boy! (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 14:55
Since he was made captain Read is the main reason why Notts have always been up there among the most successful sides. Vastly vastly under-rated, and arguably has been the best keeper for a generation.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Tumbles (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 15:10
6 down and off for rain. Well at least that's 2 points earned for not a lot of runs.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Tumbles (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 16:03
Back on at 16.30 if no more rain.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Brother Of (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 16:05
Old Boy i will throw another keeper out there who in my opinion has better glove work than Read.......James Foster!!
COACH
COACH
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: old boy! (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 16:25
Hi Brother of
Delighted for Pete today!
Read or Foster? Very close both, BUT IMO Read wins it 'hands down' on temperament!.
Delighted for Pete today!
Read or Foster? Very close both, BUT IMO Read wins it 'hands down' on temperament!.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: cricketjerry-mouse (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 16:40
Surely, ob, the extra quality you attribute to Chris Read over James Foster is in direct opposition to the very reason why he will never play for England again.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Bagpuss (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 16:43
Covers coming off at Trent Bridge
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: RadstockRob (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 16:46
Hoping for 1730 start.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: old boy! (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 17:01
Quote:cricketjerry-mouse
Surely, ob, the extra quality you attribute to Chris Read over James Foster is in direct opposition to the very reason why he will never play for England again.
Crikey! I didn't realise I was stirring a hornets nest ref keepers! I still stick with Read for his calm temperament. The reason he was dropped was because the 'coaching genius' (so he tells us?) Duncan Fletcher didn't like him!
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: old boy! (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 17:06
At least we can argue about something till the rain stops!!!
(And I'm out of circulation for a couple of weeks awaiting arrival of 5th Grandchild who may want to play for Ireland (like George??).
(And I'm out of circulation for a couple of weeks awaiting arrival of 5th Grandchild who may want to play for Ireland (like George??).
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: geordie moonraker (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 17:10
I would be tempted-now I'm back from the theatre and delighted with the cricket- to disopense with VP altogether. I didn't mind him geting used to English conditions while boosting us, but it is a 2 way street, I would also be tempted to always develop from within, because I still think Somerset ought to mean mainly Somerset (including Millfield) which is why I'm always thrilled when Pete does well.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Tumbles (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 17:34
Play stopped after all of 6 balls.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Ronniesabre (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 17:43
gEordie, I tend to agree with you..........this is a 2 way street. Now that he has missed this game we should say to SA keep him till Alf gets back.....wont happen though.
It is all the better wehen the home grown boys do it though, much more rewarding!!!
Overseas have a place no doubt but it has to be for the benefit of SCCC too!!!
It is all the better wehen the home grown boys do it though, much more rewarding!!!
Overseas have a place no doubt but it has to be for the benefit of SCCC too!!!
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Slow left (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 18:35
It is for the benefit of SCCC. He took a 5-for in the 1st game, and we won it!
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Slow left (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 18:36
Also, when we signed him, even South Africa didn't know how good he was, so Rose scooped them on scouting their own player.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Ronniesabre (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 18:45
I could say George Dockrell actually won the first game!! He didnt do much in the second and missed the third.
I meant its not much cop when SCCC dont really have say when he plays and when he doesnt.
Rose may have done a good job in getting him here but he wouldnt have seen him play for SA if they hadn'nt played him in the game he was watching so to say hes scouted their own player is stretching it a bit!!
I meant its not much cop when SCCC dont really have say when he plays and when he doesnt.
Rose may have done a good job in getting him here but he wouldnt have seen him play for SA if they hadn'nt played him in the game he was watching so to say hes scouted their own player is stretching it a bit!!
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: rodders (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 19:12
Sorry Ronnie but I think you got your sums wrong !
This is our third game and GD is playing !
Agree with you though about VP - if we can't decide when he plays and when he doesn't then we are in " what a farce " territory !
This is our third game and GD is playing !
Agree with you though about VP - if we can't decide when he plays and when he doesn't then we are in " what a farce " territory !
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 19:59
Rodders, Ronnie was referring to VP, not George.
Personally, I agree with SLC's comments of 18.35.
No blame, IMO, can attach to Brian Rose for this situation.
Personally, I agree with SLC's comments of 18.35.
No blame, IMO, can attach to Brian Rose for this situation.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: SheptonPaul (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 20:34
My reading of it (and let's face it, we're ALL guessing) is that VP has a minor injury (which he'd normally have played through), but BR felt it was in our long-term interests, vis-a-vis the SA management and VP, to leave him out of this game. Part of BR's discussions pre-season with Gary Kirsten et al may well have been along the lines of "if he gets a minor injury, please rest him rather than playing him and risking longer-term, Test-tour-affecting, injury".
I don't think for a moment it's VP's fault, just a wise and sensible decision on Brian Rose's part.
I don't think for a moment it's VP's fault, just a wise and sensible decision on Brian Rose's part.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Roger Sweet (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 20:57
VP bowled a lot of fruitless overs in the Warwickshire match. Was this more than the number per 4 day match that SA were expecting? This could be very tough on Tres as captain who at the end was using his 2 main strike weapons to try and get the victory at Edgbaston!!!
There is a lot of sense spoken by many on this thread as to whether we should proceed with an overseas player. Looking at the Sky coverage this evening, it was encouraging to see Meschede and Gregory doing well today, and there would be great satisfaction in beating Notts minus VP. And it was great to see Trego taking on the extra responsibilities - he opened the bowling for Middlesex in his one season with them.
Perhaps it is time for the ECB to tighten up on the regulations for an overseas player - one (and one only) per season for 4 day & 40/40 and/or 50/50 with no substitute allowed (arrangements for 20/20 to remain unchanged).
This would make all counties probably take on an overseas player who could play the whole season.
There is a lot of sense spoken by many on this thread as to whether we should proceed with an overseas player. Looking at the Sky coverage this evening, it was encouraging to see Meschede and Gregory doing well today, and there would be great satisfaction in beating Notts minus VP. And it was great to see Trego taking on the extra responsibilities - he opened the bowling for Middlesex in his one season with them.
Perhaps it is time for the ECB to tighten up on the regulations for an overseas player - one (and one only) per season for 4 day & 40/40 and/or 50/50 with no substitute allowed (arrangements for 20/20 to remain unchanged).
This would make all counties probably take on an overseas player who could play the whole season.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: SheptonPaul (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 21:03
From our friend George on Cricinfo, much as I expected and reasonably sensible, I think:
"South Africa have little to fear. While Philander has a variety of niggles, none of them are thought to be serious. Somerset rested him from this game after discussions with Cricket South Africa and expect him to be available for next week's Championship match against Lancashire. They might even have fielded him here had the weather been warmer.
"We don't want to take any risk with him," Brian Rose, Somerset's director of cricket told ESPNcricinfo. "There was a danger that he could play, worsen the injury, and then go home and not be available for us again.
"He has played two matches in very cold weather and, with the forecast suggesting we were going to have more cold weather, I decided not to risk him. We've been liaising closely with Cricket South Africa ever since he arrived and, as things stand, he should be fine for next week.""
"South Africa have little to fear. While Philander has a variety of niggles, none of them are thought to be serious. Somerset rested him from this game after discussions with Cricket South Africa and expect him to be available for next week's Championship match against Lancashire. They might even have fielded him here had the weather been warmer.
"We don't want to take any risk with him," Brian Rose, Somerset's director of cricket told ESPNcricinfo. "There was a danger that he could play, worsen the injury, and then go home and not be available for us again.
"He has played two matches in very cold weather and, with the forecast suggesting we were going to have more cold weather, I decided not to risk him. We've been liaising closely with Cricket South Africa ever since he arrived and, as things stand, he should be fine for next week.""
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 21:04
Roger - Given the strict criteria for a work permit that now exist, combined with a busy international schedule, I suspect it would be all but impossible for 18 counties to find an overseas player that could play the whole season.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: ronnies (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 21:19
I think that is correct it would be well nigh impossible to get one all season and would come down to money as we would all be chasing the same players and we know who would win that.
You are perceptive AG, I did mean VP in my previous post. I do not attach any blame on anyone for this especially Brian Rose who does remarkably well but is just a bad situation IMO and your game plan kind of goes out the window when your best bowler isnt playin so its really difficult to plan,
We've done ok today though I suspect we may struggle too when we bat.
You are perceptive AG, I did mean VP in my previous post. I do not attach any blame on anyone for this especially Brian Rose who does remarkably well but is just a bad situation IMO and your game plan kind of goes out the window when your best bowler isnt playin so its really difficult to plan,
We've done ok today though I suspect we may struggle too when we bat.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 21:25
Yes, SP.
I do rather wonder if we'll all need to hope for warmer weather, though, if we want to see VP versus Lancs.
I do rather wonder if we'll all need to hope for warmer weather, though, if we want to see VP versus Lancs.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: rodders (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 21:27
Apologies Ronnie - my mistake - though in my defence your post was a bit ambiguous as to whom you were refering - no offence intended !
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 22:22
Brilliant stuff from our heroes today, ladies and gentlemen, I give you....Mr Peter Trego....the finest allrounder in the country.....bar none.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 19/04/2012 22:40
Age and beauty before boyish charm.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Ronniesabre (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 09:06
Quote:rodders12
Apologies Ronnie - my mistake - though in my defence your post was a bit ambiguous as to whom you were refering - no offence intended !
None taken. Lets hope we do as well VPless as we did yesterday.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Sloop John B (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 09:35
Much sense from George as usual. The doomsayers need to get a sense of perspective!
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 09:45
E route to T Bridge. 1 hr away. Weather fine at mo.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 09:55
If VP does have a back niggle then this is a very sensible decision and one Rosey would have probably have made with or without SA'a input.
If you get a bloke who is good when he is fully fit then you want him to be good as often as possible and therefore not playing him when carrying a niggle just because we have him for a short period of time seems a sensible use of the time we do have him for.
If he had played him in this game and it had come out afterwards that he had played injured and was then returning home because he would not be able to play with resultant aggravation of that injury until June we'd all be moaning about that instead.
However I still stand by what I said yesterday ( I know YOU didn't say it AG - it isn't always all about what you say :-)
If an international bowler is to be of use to a county then they have to have the majority say in how he is used. If an international board interfers in that use to the point that his importance to the side paying his wages is blunted then he is a waste of money however good he may be for the odd game he plays!
If you get a bloke who is good when he is fully fit then you want him to be good as often as possible and therefore not playing him when carrying a niggle just because we have him for a short period of time seems a sensible use of the time we do have him for.
If he had played him in this game and it had come out afterwards that he had played injured and was then returning home because he would not be able to play with resultant aggravation of that injury until June we'd all be moaning about that instead.
However I still stand by what I said yesterday ( I know YOU didn't say it AG - it isn't always all about what you say :-)
If an international bowler is to be of use to a county then they have to have the majority say in how he is used. If an international board interfers in that use to the point that his importance to the side paying his wages is blunted then he is a waste of money however good he may be for the odd game he plays!
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Tumbles (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 11:02
Play has commenced. Lets have them all out by lunch pleeease.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: KeynshamLad (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 11:03
The point about who is paying is of course very important. We know where the counties stand in respect of centrally contracted England players. What sort of contract SA have with their players I don't know, but I would expect BR not to try to take a legalistic view of the situation but to operate on the basis of what he sees as the long term best interests of SCCC
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Tumbles (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 11:13
Trego's getting good at this opening bowling lark.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Tumbles (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 11:17
5 for Pete. What as George Dobbell saying?
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Tumbles (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 11:21
12.15pm: George Dobell at Nottinghamshire v Somerset
Somerset have opened the bowling with Peter Trego, who has never taken a five-wicket haul for them in the championship. Their supporters could be forgiven for pondering the wisdom of allowing Charl Willoughby to leave them for Essex. Without the injured Philander, Hussain and Dibble, the Somerset bowling attack does not have the look of prospective champions.
Somerset have opened the bowling with Peter Trego, who has never taken a five-wicket haul for them in the championship. Their supporters could be forgiven for pondering the wisdom of allowing Charl Willoughby to leave them for Essex. Without the injured Philander, Hussain and Dibble, the Somerset bowling attack does not have the look of prospective champions.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: uncle morpheus (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 11:22
8 down. Well done pete
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: SheptonPaul (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 11:27
Tumbles, that GD extract was from about 24 hrs ago! He's just posted:
Peter Trego has just completed the first five-wicket haul of his Somerset championship career. After removing the left-handed Paul Franks with a good one that nipped back, Trego produced a beauty that pitched middle and leg and moved away late to take the edge of Ben Phillips’ bat. The word ‘unplayable’ is over used, but quite how that delivery could have been played is not clear.
Peter Trego has just completed the first five-wicket haul of his Somerset championship career. After removing the left-handed Paul Franks with a good one that nipped back, Trego produced a beauty that pitched middle and leg and moved away late to take the edge of Ben Phillips’ bat. The word ‘unplayable’ is over used, but quite how that delivery could have been played is not clear.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Tumbles (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 11:37
Yep I know it was 24 hours ago, very amusing that we've proved him completely wrong.
Now if he would feel free to slate our batting line up shortly then hopefully we'll stick 500 on the board
If it wasn't for Reed we could have been in the lead by now.
Now if he would feel free to slate our batting line up shortly then hopefully we'll stick 500 on the board
If it wasn't for Reed we could have been in the lead by now.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Lecidreman (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 11:56
i am really looking forward to the Somerset reply, especially in light of the last Notts game!!!!
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: SheptonPaul (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 11:56
I used to quite like Chris Read, but am going off him rapidly...
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: nelliec (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 11:59
Getting frustrated.Always seems to happen to us.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Lecidreman (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 11:59
29 for the last wicket and counting, does anyone know if it was the wicket or the conditions or both are to do with the low score or just fine bowl / bad batting?
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Nailsea_Fizz (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 12:03
I think he's ace and will get a 100
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Tumbles (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 12:12
How many runs have we gone for in the last couple of games innings when 8/9 down?
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Nailsea_Fizz (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 12:14
Bric Bats flying now there is something negative happenning 
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Ronniesabre (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 12:16
Quite a lot. Both Warks innings had late wicket stands and below the radar Middlesex's last 3 wickets got 96 at Taunton on day 2.
I thought Kirby was brought in because of his ability v 9,10 jack?
Still it should prove to us its not a minefield.
I thought Kirby was brought in because of his ability v 9,10 jack?
Still it should prove to us its not a minefield.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 12:25
This has nothing to do with the last wicket stand and everything to do with Chris Read. He is the man that does this for Notts over and over again - he keeps them in games they have no right to be in and they should put him in cotton wool after every game and pray he plays until he's 50 odd.
Is his glove work the best? Nope but it used to be when he wasn't playing for England because he embarrassed those in charge by misreading and then ducking a slow ball which took his stumps through his legs on national TV. It was bowled by Courteney (I think) who had one of the best slow balls in the business and no disgrace in my eyes.
I want his wicket early in every game we play against my home county because while he is there Notts are in the game.
Is his glove work the best? Nope but it used to be when he wasn't playing for England because he embarrassed those in charge by misreading and then ducking a slow ball which took his stumps through his legs on national TV. It was bowled by Courteney (I think) who had one of the best slow balls in the business and no disgrace in my eyes.
I want his wicket early in every game we play against my home county because while he is there Notts are in the game.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Tumbles (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 12:27
Great innings as painful as it is.
I hope we bat in the same manner as him, this afternoon.
I hope we bat in the same manner as him, this afternoon.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Ronniesabre (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 12:29
excellent player is Read!!
But last had nothing to do with him and neither did the previous week!!
But last had nothing to do with him and neither did the previous week!!
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Tumbles (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 12:34
I would argue we should have bowled out Notts by now to stop him adding anymore.. we've bowled 35 balls at a number 11 who has an average of 6.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Tumbles (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 12:35
Tres has hobbled off. Great
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 12:36
Yep that's why I'm talking about this week and not last or the previous one ????
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Tumbles (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 12:40
Looks like Compo will be opening the batting with Arul.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 12:42
What an amazing effort from Read, hats off to a superb performance.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: N Hughes (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 12:43
Notts have yet to get a batting bonus point this season.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 12:43
While people are anguishing about the back end partnerships though why don't we give some credit to taking out the front end for "lumps of grass" all.
I'd take average opposition partnerships of 16.2 per wicket any day of the week in a first up innings in a four day game. Don't really give a monkeys how they are made or who made them. It puts us in the driving seat any way you cut it.
I'd take average opposition partnerships of 16.2 per wicket any day of the week in a first up innings in a four day game. Don't really give a monkeys how they are made or who made them. It puts us in the driving seat any way you cut it.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: SheptonPaul (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 12:46
I quite agree, and well played Chris Read - good West Country lad!
What happened to Tres?
What happened to Tres?
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 12:46
For sure, Grockle.
Tails do wag, but once the throat has been slashed all it serves to do is make the inevitable death a little less gruesome.
Tails do wag, but once the throat has been slashed all it serves to do is make the inevitable death a little less gruesome.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Tumbles (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 12:47
We've opened with Arul & Gregory!
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: old boy! (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 12:48
Quote:I JUST HATE THAT SAY I TOLD YOU SO! - SO I WON'T!!!old boy!
Great start! But I am always happy when we can shift Chris Read, who is still and has been IMO one of the best and consistent English wicketkeeper/batsmen since he was cynically dropped by England a few years ago.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Tumbles (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 12:49
I'm wondering if Tres is hoping to get some painkillers in over lunch with a view to coming out at 3
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 12:49
We all know Read is a danger, ob.....lets give the boys credit for skittling the other ten.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Ronniesabre (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 12:51
What is up with Tres?
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: old boy! (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 12:51
Quote:I hope it isn't the ankle which he assured us at the AGM was OK!!SheptonPaul
I quite agree, and well played Chris Read - good West Country lad!
What happened to Tres?
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Tumbles (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 12:52
Tres went over on his ankle, not sure if it was the same one.
He did it 2 balls before they were all out.. sigh.
He did it 2 balls before they were all out.. sigh.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Ronniesabre (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 12:53
I dread to even contemplate that it is OB!!
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: JonR (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 13:00
George Dobell says it's his right ankle which is the one he had problems with at the end of last season. Seriously bad news!
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Little Bird (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 13:05
Some stats for you on late partnerships against us this season.
NINTH WICKET...
Middlesex 35 and 18
Warks 1 and 55*
Notts 5
LAST WICKET..
Middlesex 18 and 0
Warks 47
Notts 56
Really excellent how well we are bowling these season, especially considering all the injuries, but obviously something for our coaching staff to work on regarding finishing sides off. I'm sure it will be addressed..
NINTH WICKET...
Middlesex 35 and 18
Warks 1 and 55*
Notts 5
LAST WICKET..
Middlesex 18 and 0
Warks 47
Notts 56
Really excellent how well we are bowling these season, especially considering all the injuries, but obviously something for our coaching staff to work on regarding finishing sides off. I'm sure it will be addressed..
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Nailsea_Fizz (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 13:12
Who cares they were all out for 162
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Little Bird (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 13:17
Who cares? Er, any team wishing to improve game on game. That's why they all employ statisticians and computer people.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Tumbles (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 13:29
Quote:Nailsea_Fizz
Who cares they were all out for 162
That's actually their highest first innings score of the season. They've won both games previous with lower scores!
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 13:30
The most worrying thing about Tres is that the ankle played up with little apparent provocation from anything that he did to it.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 13:31
I can report, though, that he was able to apply pressure to it, did not have to hop off.
Anyone else surprised that Compton has not opened?
Anyone else surprised that Compton has not opened?
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Tumbles (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 13:34
Quote:AGod
I can report, though, that he was able to apply pressure to it, did not have to hop off.
Anyone else surprised that Compton has not opened?
I did ponder if he was going to have an injection in it with the hope of coming out at 4 or 5
Gregory has been introduced as the worlds first 'Lunchwatchman' apparently. Either that or Compo wanted first shout on the sandwiches.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 13:36
Weather is funny. Lots of spots of rain .. And warm sunshine.
I missed the first 3 wkts as still en route!
From what I saw 3 bowlers bowled quite well but Lewis was far too short.
Read's wagon wheel had only 14 runs in the 'v ' which might tell an overall tale about the length bowled to him?
I missed the first 3 wkts as still en route!
From what I saw 3 bowlers bowled quite well but Lewis was far too short.
Read's wagon wheel had only 14 runs in the 'v ' which might tell an overall tale about the length bowled to him?
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 13:40
Lewis has opened before in his career I believe and with Compo doing such an effective job at Number 3 why move him if you don't have to?
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Tumbles (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 13:41
Fair point, Grockle. I'm sure Rose has said in past he belives he'll be more of a batter than bowler when he matures?
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 13:52
Well if he's not going to be a full blown seamer then he needs to be a top 6 batter or he'll end up being nothing in both skills and will lose his chance at a place in the future Somerset side. He does not seem to be the all rounder that George and Craig M could develop into so he has to look at a long term option at the front or somewhere at 3 to 5.
Future opening partnership of Jones and Gregory perhaps?
Future opening partnership of Jones and Gregory perhaps?
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Little Bird (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 13:56
Lewis used to open at Under 13 Level.
He batted at 3 at Under 15 and for England Under 19s.
He generally batted at 4 for our second eleven.
So he's quite experienced in moving up and down the order.
Ps Arul becomes only the 3rd player of the match so far to reach double figures. Puts Read's fantastic knock into perspective.
He batted at 3 at Under 15 and for England Under 19s.
He generally batted at 4 for our second eleven.
So he's quite experienced in moving up and down the order.
Ps Arul becomes only the 3rd player of the match so far to reach double figures. Puts Read's fantastic knock into perspective.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Lecidreman (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 14:01
Compo has the most runs in the 2012 County Championship, and is on course for the 1500 run season he has been promising (or was that Hildreth)
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 14:07
Big Ben has been superb, thus far.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: mikeindex (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 14:16
Quote:Chris Cairns it was - at Lord's in 1999. Graham Thorpe, a considerably better batsman, was similarly bamboozled with less impact on his career.Grockle
Is his glove work the best? Nope but it used to be when he wasn't playing for England because he embarrassed those in charge by misreading and then ducking a slow ball which took his stumps through his legs on national TV. It was bowled by Courteney (I think) who had one of the best slow balls in the business and no disgrace in my eyes.
Word was at one time that Read wasn't being selected for England because he was 'too quiet' - see my posting on the Bullying thread.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 14:29
Always a mistake not to have a third man in seaming conditions, I feel, and Compton has benefited from Read failing to emulate Tres in that regard.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 14:40
Dodgy attempt to claim catch by Patel. I was 99 percent sure it was not taken. Arul seemed 100 percent sure.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 14:40
How odd, it's working again now.
This commentator is a bit of a sulker isn't he.
What's his email address?
This commentator is a bit of a sulker isn't he.
What's his email address?
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 14:47
I'd say weather will fill in in about 45 mins to an hour.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 14:50
Yep sorry BJ. The link to the story did not seem to work for me either and so we'd lost the front page. I therefore set up a second more up to date front page and was going to merge it (hence it being closed while I finished it. The present frontpage reference does not take you to the story but to the messageboard. I'll merge the new one at Tea and see what happens.
Has anyone else had problems getting to the commentary page from cricinfo today? Part of the reason I had to reset the frontpage is that the only link that goes anywhere for me is the link on the story itself.
Has anyone else had problems getting to the commentary page from cricinfo today? Part of the reason I had to reset the frontpage is that the only link that goes anywhere for me is the link on the story itself.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 14:52
Cheers Grockle, I thought it was me being clumsy.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Little Bird (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 15:09
In this match so far, 3 of our bowlers have recorded their best figures of the season so far..and so has Arul with the bat.
You could add Lewis to that and make 4, but ofc it's his first CC match of the season so that'd be a slightly false statistic.
You could add Lewis to that and make 4, but ofc it's his first CC match of the season so that'd be a slightly false statistic.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Tumbles (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 15:32
50 for Arul. So far so good.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Grizzers (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 15:32
Terrific effort by Pete Trego - good for him !
Have to admire Chris Read for his (irritatingly good) stickability. He does seem to save some of his best efforts for us - unfortunately. Still, we have got to be happy with having them all out for 162.
MT's absence is concerning. I don't have any idea re the situation re his ankle, but it does - again - make you wonder whether corrective surgery at the end of last season was an option.
Fingers very firmly crossed.
Grizzzly
Have to admire Chris Read for his (irritatingly good) stickability. He does seem to save some of his best efforts for us - unfortunately. Still, we have got to be happy with having them all out for 162.
MT's absence is concerning. I don't have any idea re the situation re his ankle, but it does - again - make you wonder whether corrective surgery at the end of last season was an option.
Fingers very firmly crossed.
Grizzzly
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Following on (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 15:35
According to the Somerset CCC twitter feed, Tres going for a scan before a decision is taken as to what further part he plays in the game.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 15:36
The facebook info is that he is having a scan before it is decided whether he will bat or not!! He therefore probably won't bat today or at all!
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Ronniesabre (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 15:37
nobodys batting...............its raining!!!
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 15:50
Lively innings by Arul. Great orthodox driving and then a wonderful back foot drive to bring up the 50.
The weather looks set in, though, so I think that might be that.
Compton has left the ball very well, including on length.
Lewis looked fine until the fateful ball from Ben.
Obviously very concerned re:Tres.
The weather looks set in, though, so I think that might be that.
Compton has left the ball very well, including on length.
Lewis looked fine until the fateful ball from Ben.
Obviously very concerned re:Tres.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Tumbles (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 16:03
Weather doesn't look for the weekend either. I guess maximum bonus points and denying Notts many wouldn't be a bad result.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Nailsea_Fizz (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 16:15
Quote:Little Bird
Who cares? Er, any team wishing to improve game on game. That's why they all employ statisticians and computer people.
Well maybe they should worry less about computers and statistics and reply on what their eyes are telling them
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Nailsea_Fizz (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 16:16
That's actually their highest first innings score of the season. They've won both games previous with lower scores![/quote]
However neither game involved us.
However neither game involved us.
Re: Somerset in Notts?
Posted by: Little Bird (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 16:22
Quote:Nailsea_FizzQuote:Little Bird
Who cares? Er, any team wishing to improve game on game. That's why they all employ statisticians and computer people.
Well maybe they should worry less about computers and statistics and reply on what their eyes are telling them
Yes and their eyes will be telling them that too often this season we've been held up by annoying late partnerships
We should have beaten Warks last week..we didn't because their 9th wicket put on over 50 runs in the second innings. A likely 19 point victory became a 3 point defeat because we couldn't clean up the tail
Today we had Notts at 106-9. One more wicket and we're batting after just an hour's play today, with a small target to chase to get an innings lead. But they added 50 odd for the last wicket, we now need an extra 50 runs for the lead and we've lost an hour, which could still be a big loss with the bad weather around.
So don't say 'who cares'! We should all care because, if we can just knock the tail over more quickly, we'll be looking a really decent side for the rest of the season.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: geordie moonraker (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 16:46
I am not sure that the "tail" exists in the way it used to (CW excepted) We have batsmen like Max Waller who woudl be our tail who at a slightly lower level can post very big scores. We are not talking rabbits and headlights but competent batsmen. Today was different in that Read is a proper batsman. The old phrase " a better batsman would have got a nick" when talki9ng of a swinging ball still applies. Patel (Warwick) is no a bad batsman, decided that the way to play was to chance his arm and it worked. There is no nedd for us to exaggerate problems that aren't problems. Lancashire today scored as many for their last 4 wickets as their first 6. It is a trend of the modern game I believe.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 16:46
Perhaps lower order are getting better with the bat.
The boys will know what to do, I'm sure they're trying their best.
The boys will know what to do, I'm sure they're trying their best.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 16:54
We weren't beaten by Warwickshire because we couldn't clean up the tail.
We were beaten by Warwickshire because we didn't pass 200 in the first innings! If you're looking for the 50 odd runs we were short look there.
We were beaten by Warwickshire because we didn't pass 200 in the first innings! If you're looking for the 50 odd runs we were short look there.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: geordie moonraker (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 16:56
I see Big Jim and I think the same at the same time.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 17:01
Couldn't agree more Geordie. If you don't want problems with either their tail or yours, then score some runs up front and take the problem away.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 17:19
I hope it doesn't worry you too much, Geordie.....though we both have this dreadful way of looking at the positive side of things.
Good...innit?
Good...innit?
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: cricketjerry-mouse (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 17:30
The Warwickshire `tail`, that the lugubrious Little Bird says we failed to `clean up`, was anchored by their captain and top six batsman Jamie Troughton, who has played six ODIs.
His partner was New Zealand all-rounder Jeetan Patel, who has made 13 Test appearances, including at least one this winter, played in 39 ODIs and has a top score of 120 on the self same Edgbaston ground three seasons ago.
Didn`t a famous politician once say: `Some chicken, some neck`?
His partner was New Zealand all-rounder Jeetan Patel, who has made 13 Test appearances, including at least one this winter, played in 39 ODIs and has a top score of 120 on the self same Edgbaston ground three seasons ago.
Didn`t a famous politician once say: `Some chicken, some neck`?
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Bagpuss (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 17:31
Play called off for the day
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: mikeindex (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 17:54
Just one or two random thoughts on this tail-disposal business.
Sometimes unlikely batsmen have a good day, perhaps with a bit of luck. (Even I once scored 32 in a club game).
If we'd been 106/9 and, say, Jos had gone on to make 100+ while Steve K helped add 60 for the last wicket, how many people here would be saying how bad our opp were at bowling out the tail rather than giving credit to J&S?
And what specific skills are required to bowl well at the tail, which don't help against the better batsmen at the top?
Sometimes unlikely batsmen have a good day, perhaps with a bit of luck. (Even I once scored 32 in a club game).
If we'd been 106/9 and, say, Jos had gone on to make 100+ while Steve K helped add 60 for the last wicket, how many people here would be saying how bad our opp were at bowling out the tail rather than giving credit to J&S?
And what specific skills are required to bowl well at the tail, which don't help against the better batsmen at the top?
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Right Arm Over (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 19:22
Our problem wasn't the tail, it was Chris Read, a player who career averages 47 in the county chamionship.
We should be praising our injury hit attack and nothing else. Great to see Pete steping up to the plate when we are on our knees injury wise.
So far this season I'm pleased with the start and that we:
Won our first game
Showed plenty of fight in the second
Have bowled out an excellent Notts side for 160 odd
Statistics are a tool for the half empty brigade.
We should be praising our injury hit attack and nothing else. Great to see Pete steping up to the plate when we are on our knees injury wise.
So far this season I'm pleased with the start and that we:
Won our first game
Showed plenty of fight in the second
Have bowled out an excellent Notts side for 160 odd
Statistics are a tool for the half empty brigade.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Little Bird (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 19:33
Statistics also form the scorecard that determines the result of a match.
Read was excellent in marshalling the tail. A fantastic innings. But we still took around 40 deliveries to remove the Number Eleven. That's not being half empty, that's merely stating a fact. Get them out for 110 and we might even have had a lead by the time the rain came and could kick on tomorrow.
That said, it was a great bowl by Peter..well done to him! We have a lot of character this season. Vernon misses out, his replacement gets 5 wickets even though he rarely opens the bowling. And with Marcus missing, how great to see Arul hit his first 50 of the season.
Well Done Somerset
Read was excellent in marshalling the tail. A fantastic innings. But we still took around 40 deliveries to remove the Number Eleven. That's not being half empty, that's merely stating a fact. Get them out for 110 and we might even have had a lead by the time the rain came and could kick on tomorrow.
That said, it was a great bowl by Peter..well done to him! We have a lot of character this season. Vernon misses out, his replacement gets 5 wickets even though he rarely opens the bowling. And with Marcus missing, how great to see Arul hit his first 50 of the season.
Well Done Somerset
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Clarence Parker (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 19:44
Statistics don't lie, but they don't necessarily tell the whole truth either.
Should Marcus be out injured for a game or so or even longer, who will take on the role of captain in his and Thomas's absence?
Should Marcus be out injured for a game or so or even longer, who will take on the role of captain in his and Thomas's absence?
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Right Arm Over (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 19:51
Quote:Little Bird
Statistics also form the scorecard that determines the result of a match.
Read was excellent in marshalling the tail. A fantastic innings. But we still took around 40 deliveries to remove the Number Eleven. That's not being half empty, that's merely stating a fact.
But does it tell the full story?
Was the number eleven exposed for a number of consecutive deliveries or did Read bat so well that we were only getting 1/2 balls per over, therefore unable to build pressure?
Was the number eleven batting to ability or exceeding expectations - maybe you could have a look at his statistics?
Today is Friday, it's a fact but a pretty pointless one.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Little Bird (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 19:57
His career average is 6 I believe. I think he also faced 2 whole overs but then, as you'd expect from Read's class innings, he tended to face the last 2 deliveries of most others.
As with any debate, there is merit to both sides of the discussion
I think there is a lot of truth to what you say...and I also believe I'm right to feel frustrated that we can't always get rid of numbers 9, 10 and jack this season and I'm sure it's something being worked on.
Only on Sunday night will we know if it proves costly. It didn't against Middlesex and prob won't here if it stays wet.
More positives than negatives today. Well Done boys
As with any debate, there is merit to both sides of the discussion
I think there is a lot of truth to what you say...and I also believe I'm right to feel frustrated that we can't always get rid of numbers 9, 10 and jack this season and I'm sure it's something being worked on.
Only on Sunday night will we know if it proves costly. It didn't against Middlesex and prob won't here if it stays wet.
More positives than negatives today. Well Done boys
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Slow left (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 21:49
Its a common trend in modern cricket, no team has rabbits any more (apart from Willoughby), so of course we (and everyone else) struggle to dismiss the tail. Notts in particular are notorious for having a better bottom 5 than top.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Roger Sweet (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 21:56
Wow!!! There are still far too many negative waves from so many of our posters. There are so many positives from the last 3 days against Warwickshire and the first 2 against Notts. We lose VP and now may be down to 10 batsmen for the rest of this match. Trego came to the plate with the bowling and Arul has done likewise with the bat - regretfully the weather will probably save Notts. However, I have seen nothing yet that can prevent us winning our first ever County Championship!!! Come on everybody - let us send only positive waves to our team!!!
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 20/04/2012 23:48
Roger, dear Roger.
Welcome to the party, those of us who've been fighting the good fight for so many years now need a bit of new energy to keep us going.
Don't worry about the doom and gloomers, they're harmless....well, most of them.
Welcome to the party, those of us who've been fighting the good fight for so many years now need a bit of new energy to keep us going.
Don't worry about the doom and gloomers, they're harmless....well, most of them.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 07:06
I see the Warks defeat is being re-hashed in terms of not taking those last 2 wkts.
Here's one to put in your pipe; Our bowlers took 18 wickets. Their bowlers took 18 wickets. Arguably, we lost because we GAVE them two wickets via run out.
As for yesterday's play, there was a good deal of strike farming. When we did get to bowl at Gurney (who, by the way, looks sharp with the ball) there was a bit of an element of not treating him as a tail-Ender in that we bowled in the corrdidor, not at the stumps.
By far the highlight of the truncated day was Arul's batting. He looked a million dollars and capable of a million runs.
Here's one to put in your pipe; Our bowlers took 18 wickets. Their bowlers took 18 wickets. Arguably, we lost because we GAVE them two wickets via run out.
As for yesterday's play, there was a good deal of strike farming. When we did get to bowl at Gurney (who, by the way, looks sharp with the ball) there was a bit of an element of not treating him as a tail-Ender in that we bowled in the corrdidor, not at the stumps.
By far the highlight of the truncated day was Arul's batting. He looked a million dollars and capable of a million runs.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: geordie moonraker (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 07:53
If you add our three games together so far we have shown that we have the players on the day. IT was good to read AG's assessment of Arul's batting. We have had runs from Compton, Kieswetter, Hildreth Buttler Dibble and Trego Philander in difficult circumstances. We have had wickets from Philander, Dockrell Trego Kirby and a chip in from MEschede and Gregory. It bodes well in the longer term. If we have to manage without Marcus it shows we are not a one man team.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 07:58
We have already shown enough to suggest that we are more than capable of winning the CC, we know we get better as the season progresses, a win over the next two days puts us well and truly in the box seat.
Let's all keep our fingers crossed that the results of the skipper's scan are positive....good luck Marcus.
Let's all keep our fingers crossed that the results of the skipper's scan are positive....good luck Marcus.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 08:11
Fervently hope Marcus is okay.
If he isn't?
Well, I suppose that if you are Brian Rose the possible silver lining is that you would get definitive answers from the rest of their group as to their mettle and character?
Who would step up to the plate? Who would shrink from the challenge? If you are trying to build a team/squad to win silverware then these, surely, are critical questions?
If he isn't?
Well, I suppose that if you are Brian Rose the possible silver lining is that you would get definitive answers from the rest of their group as to their mettle and character?
Who would step up to the plate? Who would shrink from the challenge? If you are trying to build a team/squad to win silverware then these, surely, are critical questions?
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Mike TA1 (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 08:22
I myself have nothing against negative views; if that person feels that way then he/she is quite within his or her rights to do so.
I occasionally may post a negative comment but I hope I balance it with positive comments as well.
I will never criticize those that do.
I occasionally may post a negative comment but I hope I balance it with positive comments as well.
I will never criticize those that do.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 09:25
Just thought I'd mention another fact - this 'season' everyone is going on about is 2 and a bit matches old!!
We've only had 5 chances to 'bowl their tail out' and we've managed that the majority of the time. We have won 50% of the matches we've completed
If you are going to look for trends I'd suggest it's a bit early to start stating what they are based on 2012 performances.
We've only had 5 chances to 'bowl their tail out' and we've managed that the majority of the time. We have won 50% of the matches we've completed
If you are going to look for trends I'd suggest it's a bit early to start stating what they are based on 2012 performances.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: geordie moonraker (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 11:13
so what do we hope for today?{ apart from good news from the scan}
We have 96 overs . If we score 3 an over that is 288 and leaves us at 360 ish. That would be very good in these circumstances and conditions. A lead of 200 with our 4th innings to come gives us a shout.I'll settle for a first innings lead anyway and see where we go from there.
We have 96 overs . If we score 3 an over that is 288 and leaves us at 360 ish. That would be very good in these circumstances and conditions. A lead of 200 with our 4th innings to come gives us a shout.I'll settle for a first innings lead anyway and see where we go from there.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 11:21
Forecast strongly suggests a rain-ruined draw.
So, for me, today is mainly about picking up bonus points.
What this means is that, if he is still, there will come a point when Compton accelerating will be in the best interests of the team.
When that point comes will be a matter of opinion. Personally, I think that once we get 60 or so runs ahead, that will probably be the approriate time.
So, for me, today is mainly about picking up bonus points.
What this means is that, if he is still, there will come a point when Compton accelerating will be in the best interests of the team.
When that point comes will be a matter of opinion. Personally, I think that once we get 60 or so runs ahead, that will probably be the approriate time.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Slow left (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 11:33
Bat until the bonus points stop then declare.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Right Arm Over (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 11:34
AGod,
All depends on the wicket when it comes to any attempt to accelerate. One thing I have always noted this time of year, is that wickets fall in quick succession. Good scores can be built when there are two batters able to occupy the crease for the first hour and remain steady. If the forecast is correct then any push for quick runs may prove to be fruitless anyhow.
Best way is to bat the day and see where we are and hope that the met office are wrong.
All depends on the wicket when it comes to any attempt to accelerate. One thing I have always noted this time of year, is that wickets fall in quick succession. Good scores can be built when there are two batters able to occupy the crease for the first hour and remain steady. If the forecast is correct then any push for quick runs may prove to be fruitless anyhow.
Best way is to bat the day and see where we are and hope that the met office are wrong.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Slow left (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 12:01
From Cricinfo's live coverage (George):
At least we don't seem to be talking about season endangering at the moment.
Quote:It is, in the words of Brian Rose “pretty certain” that Marcus Trescothick will not play any more cricket for the “next couple of weeks at least”. Trescothick suffered a recurrence of an old ankle ligament injury in the field yesterday. He was taken for scans in Derby and will see a specialist in Exeter at 2pm on Monday.
He could, however, bat “with a runner and in an emergency” in this game, according to Rose.
At least we don't seem to be talking about season endangering at the moment.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Railboy (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 12:01
I seriously expect Notts to be one of our main rivals for the title. Therefore denying them bonus points may be just as important
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: SheptonPaul (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 12:10
I agree with RAO - try to bat the day, see what the weather does and where we are at 6.30. They will of course re-assess as the day develops, esp at lunch and tea, but that looks to be a good initial policy.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: edinburghbil (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 12:51
These two have done s superb job to get us into the lead (particularly nice to see Arul in the runs!). Even cameos from James, Trigger, Jos, Craig and Craig, could put us in a really strong position. If the rain gives us enough tome to make anything of it is in the lap of the cricketing gods!
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Sloop John B (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 12:51
What a Star! Welldone Arul - he really has taken on the senior opener role in Tres absence.
Great Ton.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012:04:21:13:03:07 by Sloop John B.
Great Ton.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012:04:21:13:03:07 by Sloop John B.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Slow left (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 12:57
Fantastic to lose just one wicket (our number 8!) in passing a side as good as Notts.
Now, for a day and a half without rain...
Now, for a day and a half without rain...
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Scrumper (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 12:57
Well done Arul! Now let's push on to 400 by teatime.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: nelliec (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 13:00
Best session of the season!
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Right Arm Over (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 13:08
Superb stuff Arul and excellent support from Compo. AGOD talked about acceleration and I was a tad doubtful but a good start to the next session will certainly make the desire to push for quick runs a less risky gamble.
If we can get achieve a lead of 200 by tea then Tres and Rosey will have something to think about.
If we can get achieve a lead of 200 by tea then Tres and Rosey will have something to think about.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: cricketjerry-mouse (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 13:12
Hopefully Tresco will not be absent for long, and the pain for supporters has already been eased today by Arul`s 100.
But the repeat of the captain`s ankle injury from last season, plus the likelihood of at least one of our two batsmen-keepers being absent for the plethora of ODIs this summer, raises the possibility of Brian Rose going for a batter as overseas player when Philander`s contract ends.
Countries without Test commitments for the remainder of this summer are Sri Lanka, Australia and Pakistan. So there would be a good choice of batters there, although the various one-day circuses do add a complication.
Another possibility might be a loan player. Here the question is finding anyone better than our young reserve players like Jones (when back from University) and Barrow. A quick glance at county batsmen - currently out of favour with their counties but with some pedigree - might suggest Mark Stoneman (second in Durham`s batting averages last summer and with experience as an opener); Chesney Hughes (a particularly hard-hitting Derbyshire batsman with two championship centuries last summer) and Sam Northeast (perhaps rather over-hyped when at Harrow but an ever present in the Kent batting line-up last summer).
Not particularly eye-catching perhaps, but I would have thought Mark Stoneman might be worth a shout - if Durham agreed to a loan of course.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012:04:21:13:25:59 by cricketjerry-mouse.
But the repeat of the captain`s ankle injury from last season, plus the likelihood of at least one of our two batsmen-keepers being absent for the plethora of ODIs this summer, raises the possibility of Brian Rose going for a batter as overseas player when Philander`s contract ends.
Countries without Test commitments for the remainder of this summer are Sri Lanka, Australia and Pakistan. So there would be a good choice of batters there, although the various one-day circuses do add a complication.
Another possibility might be a loan player. Here the question is finding anyone better than our young reserve players like Jones (when back from University) and Barrow. A quick glance at county batsmen - currently out of favour with their counties but with some pedigree - might suggest Mark Stoneman (second in Durham`s batting averages last summer and with experience as an opener); Chesney Hughes (a particularly hard-hitting Derbyshire batsman with two championship centuries last summer) and Sam Northeast (perhaps rather over-hyped when at Harrow but an ever present in the Kent batting line-up last summer).
Not particularly eye-catching perhaps, but I would have thought Mark Stoneman might be worth a shout - if Durham agreed to a loan of course.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012:04:21:13:25:59 by cricketjerry-mouse.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: ronnies (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 13:14
and so it began......if Buttler hadn't hit Kiesy then we may have been in the Champions league final. In the end we didn't but a great effort. Going forward Kartik wasnt staying so we brought in Roelof and Polly for t20..........looks like a good move. Wait though, Polly forgot he was with WI this summer so we replace him with Gayle whose fallen out with WI. Brian then finds out Roelof cant get in the country so in comes Albie............in the meantime we have signed an unknown Vernon Philander- who? He then becomes the fastest to 50 test wickets, will he come or will he not, will he get an IPL deal? No he comes and SA want to manage how we use him so we need to "rest" him for a couple of games. The natives are restless. Here comes the season, wheres Hussain, hes injured, wheres Adam, hes injured now too, after looking good and showing promise. Wheres Alf , hes at the IPL and not getting a game. Oh dear!! Gayle's fallen back in with WI and might not be coming after all too!!
Tres runs after a ball and goes down. Is it his ankle, yes it is, does he need an operation and miss the season or is it just a couple of weeks, we await with baited breath on the results, what happens if he is out? Arul and Nick plough on regardless as if nothing has happned, Somerset are still thriving.
The point of all this rambling?............its never dull supporting the mighty SCCC!! Theres always something happening to keep us on our toes. It was never meant to be dull, and you certainly dont get this at Derby and Leics!!
C'mon the boys!!
Tres runs after a ball and goes down. Is it his ankle, yes it is, does he need an operation and miss the season or is it just a couple of weeks, we await with baited breath on the results, what happens if he is out? Arul and Nick plough on regardless as if nothing has happned, Somerset are still thriving.
The point of all this rambling?............its never dull supporting the mighty SCCC!! Theres always something happening to keep us on our toes. It was never meant to be dull, and you certainly dont get this at Derby and Leics!!
C'mon the boys!!
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Right Arm Over (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 13:17
Some good points there Jerry. We will need to discount IPL players and those Aussies that are in their one day squad.
Just had a look at the Nottingham forecast, maybe a few heavy showers late on but tomorrow looks okay.
Just had a look at the Nottingham forecast, maybe a few heavy showers late on but tomorrow looks okay.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: old boy! (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 13:20
Brilliant for Arul. In view of Hildreth's own batting problems, Compton for Captain and perhaps vice-Captain in place of missing Alfie? Perhaps I'm being ultra pessimistic, but I think Tres's long term future demands that he gets a proper long term solution, which probably means out for the season? possibly after an operation? Still greater minds than mine will looking at the situation. I feel for his own, and if he wants to play into his forties, now is the time to sort things. IMO!
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Slow left (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 13:21
There must be some good Aussies who want to play in England. Khawaja?
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: mikeindex (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 13:25
Quote:ronnies
its never dull supporting the mighty SCCC!!
Of all the comments I've ever read on here I think this is the one I agree with most strongly.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Right Arm Over (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 13:26
Quote:Slow Left Chinaman
There must be some good Aussies who want to play in England. Khawaja?
I think he is with Derbys for the second half of the season.
How about Cowan, might need to have a look at English conditions in readiness for 2013?
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Slow left (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 13:27
Cameron White? Hasn't he been dropped completely recently?
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: ronnies (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 13:28
I think if the worst happens they will sign Chris Taylor.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 13:34
Ronnie - priceless. 
Now that is the way to use all these bits of info!! It certainly gives us lots to talk moan and groan about that's for sure!
Wasn't Marcus wearing this magic brace we've heard about or is that only when he is batting?
Now that is the way to use all these bits of info!! It certainly gives us lots to talk moan and groan about that's for sure!
Wasn't Marcus wearing this magic brace we've heard about or is that only when he is batting?
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Mike TA1 (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 13:38
I am so happy for Arul he has struggled in the run-up to this match, he deserve to have a secure first team place after all the years waiting to get his British citizenship.
And Nick is doing what he does best and that is staying there building a good partnership.
More to come.
And Nick is doing what he does best and that is staying there building a good partnership.
More to come.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Clarence Parker (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 13:38
Quote:old boy!
Still greater minds than mine will looking at the situation. IMO!
You should not be so modest, old boy. In my working career, I would tell people that I was very, very, very good, but also that I was very modest as well.
A very good session for Somerset and I am particularly pleased for Arul.
Well done lads.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 13:51
CJM - give me Sangakarra for overseas if we go the batsman route.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 13:59
Conditions for barring are excellent here and the time for an onslaught may be nigh.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Right Arm Over (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 14:08
The run rate is definately on the rise.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: uncle morpheus (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 14:13
Arul out for 124. Well done Arul
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: edinburghbil (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 14:23
Only real chance of a win is to get most of our runs first dig. Puts a strange pressure on teams if they are in arrears for most of their second dig. Even if it is going well, somewhere in the back of the mind is two or three wickets and we will be struggling.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Right Arm Over (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 14:35
So a rain break with the new ball on the way.
Good stuff from Somerset not only to build a lead but to increase the scoring rate.
Depending on the rain I would suggest/guess that we may bat for another 25 overs.
Good stuff from Somerset not only to build a lead but to increase the scoring rate.
Depending on the rain I would suggest/guess that we may bat for another 25 overs.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 14:35
Rain about to stop. If no further rain I would guess that an immediate resumption after tea would be on the cards(I assume they will take it early.)
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Bagpuss (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 14:41
Anyone else think its a bit spooky when AGod tells us the rain is about to stop?
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 14:47
My guess was correct. Tea now, back on at 3.30.
Weather looks VERY good now in the direction from which it is coming. Wind has picked up, though.
Weather looks VERY good now in the direction from which it is coming. Wind has picked up, though.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 15:01
He IS there Baggy - it's not the usual crystal ball thing!!
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Bagpuss (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 15:05
I know he's there Grockle but it sounded like, y'know, he was CONTROLLING the weather.....
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Clarence Parker (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 15:09
"I know he's there Grockle but it sounded like, y'know, he was CONTROLLING the weather.....2
The Lord always does, Bagpuss!
The Lord always does, Bagpuss!
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 15:24
We may find it a bit tricky for the first few overs because the ground staff were caught napping a bit by the rain.
Hopefully warm sun and decent breeze will deal with any damp very quickly, though.
Hopefully warm sun and decent breeze will deal with any damp very quickly, though.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Bagpuss (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 15:49
Congratulations to Nick Compton on a hundred - he has 581 first-class runs already this season (and counting) the highest total in the country so far.
Incidentally the SECOND highest is Hildreth...
Incidentally the SECOND highest is Hildreth...
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Grizzers (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 15:59
Well done Arul & Nick. Good to see the scoreboard looking very healthy despite Marcus being absent.
How many overs left today ? Chances of a declaration ?
Grizzzly
How many overs left today ? Chances of a declaration ?
Grizzzly
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Right Arm Over (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 16:01
Quote:Bagpuss
Congratulations to Nick Compton on a hundred - he has 581 first-class runs already this season (and counting) the highest total in the country so far.
Incidentally the SECOND highest is Hildreth...
Now on the Hildy part, that is where stats can be very misleading.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Mike TA1 (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 16:08
Grizzzly, they have just said 38 overs to go.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Grizzers (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 16:14
Thanks Mike.
Bat for 25 of them at 5 an over = 400 up, lead of 240 ish.
Get three quick wickets tonight & roll them over in the morning.
Or something like that..............!
Grizzzly
Bat for 25 of them at 5 an over = 400 up, lead of 240 ish.
Get three quick wickets tonight & roll them over in the morning.
Or something like that..............!
Grizzzly
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Right Arm Over (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 16:16
I'd like 20 overs at them tonight, it would mean forgoing a batting bonus point.
Any takers?
Any takers?
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: ronnies (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 16:22
Youcan only getting batting points up to 110 overs so see where we are then and decide.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: nelliec (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 16:25
Nick Compton has now got almost 600 1st class runs already this season. Is it inconceivable that anyone can get 1000 first class runs by the end of April,let alone the end of May,which was normally the mark of a superb start to a batsmans summer.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Right Arm Over (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 16:26
Good point Ronnies, we might as well declare at 110 ovs, a 200 run lead with the odd shower rules out one result option!!
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 16:33
I spoke to Andre Adams at lunch and they are expecting quite a bit of rain tomorrow. If we are lucky we may get heavily overcast skies, but not much wet stuff.
The attacking side of James's game seems in good order.
I think we'll need some weather related help tomorrow in terms of cloud to produce swing because the pitch is slow and only the odd ball is seaming.
The attacking side of James's game seems in good order.
I think we'll need some weather related help tomorrow in terms of cloud to produce swing because the pitch is slow and only the odd ball is seaming.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Right Arm Over (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 16:38
Thanks for the info AGod, good to hear Hildy is getting some morale boosting runs.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 16:39
Notts are starting to look a bit bedraggled.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 16:41
Lovely to read your updates from the ground, AG.
Invaluable stuff.
Invaluable stuff.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 16:44
All things considered, I think Marcus may call them in at 350.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Frome Exile (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 16:48
13 overs to get 80.
Go for it!
Go for it!
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Grizzers (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 16:54
Yep - give it some leathering.
Great to see James getting some runs.
Grizzzly
Great to see James getting some runs.
Grizzzly
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 16:59
Gurney back on. I think James will target him in a big way.
Gurney likes to bowl short and James loves the cross-batted shots.
Gurney likes to bowl short and James loves the cross-batted shots.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: barndoorio (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 17:09
6 an over for 7 overs then declare would do amazingly from when were 12/1 and just lost Banger. Star turns from everyone today, great stuff.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 17:12
Astonishing wagon wheel for Compton.
An almost equal number of runs in each of the six segments.
An almost equal number of runs in each of the six segments.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Angell Face (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 17:14
We seem to like Mr Patel's bowling!
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Grizzers (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 17:15
Cricinfo:
Last 10 ovs 74/0 RR 7.40
Terrific stuff !
Grizzzly
Last 10 ovs 74/0 RR 7.40
Terrific stuff !
Grizzzly
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: barndoorio (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 17:18
Or less. They seem to be in 20/20 mode now.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Right Arm Over (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 17:18
Amazing stuff!! And there was me thinking a 200 run lead less a batting point was what we should aim for!!
Well done boys!
Well done boys!
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: barndoorio (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 17:20
So to recap from last week, bowling is dreadful and the batting is worse. Was that the gist?
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Grizzers (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 17:22
Dilemma - declare at 400, or bat for a couple more overs for James to get his ton ?
Grizzzly
Grizzzly
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Mike TA1 (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 17:22
Max Batting points.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Slow left (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 17:24
Well that was easy!
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: mikeindex (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 17:27
Tend to think a really ruthless skipper would have declared at 400. James will get plenty more 100s.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Slow left (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 17:30
Isn't James skipper now!
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 17:32
Nice work James.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Grizzers (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 17:33
Time to declare !
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: cricketjerry-mouse (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 17:33
Nick Compton will have a maximum of 10 innings after today to become the first player to score 1,000 runs before the end of May since Graeme Hick managed it on 28 May 24 years ago.
As the last time I looked he had 647, I don`t think you would get very favourable odds from a bookie.
Incidentally, Compton has already passed Hick`s record of 410 runs in April, but he did start rather earlier on March 31, compared with Graeme`s April 17.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012:04:21:17:38:17 by cricketjerry-mouse.
As the last time I looked he had 647, I don`t think you would get very favourable odds from a bookie.
Incidentally, Compton has already passed Hick`s record of 410 runs in April, but he did start rather earlier on March 31, compared with Graeme`s April 17.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012:04:21:17:38:17 by cricketjerry-mouse.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: SheptonPaul (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 17:37
Brilliant day at the office today, esp the last couple hours. Got our points in the bag, stopped Notts getting any (110 overs are up) and batsmen in form. Will be tough to bowl them out, even if weather allows, but we've got to be in good heart after this. I'm sure somebody will still find something to moan about, but I'm happy.
PS Tres would presumably remain captain for this game, even if he's gone in the fetlock, in the dressing room at least over stuff like declarations and plotting the strategy.
PS Tres would presumably remain captain for this game, even if he's gone in the fetlock, in the dressing room at least over stuff like declarations and plotting the strategy.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 17:38
Quick convo with Mullaney. He's not prepared to say that there is nothing in it for bowlers (convo was between him and Notts fan) I listened in.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 17:39
Remarkable.
Nick Compton.....can we call him God from now on?
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012:04:21:17:40:36 by Big Jim.
Nick Compton.....can we call him God from now on?
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012:04:21:17:40:36 by Big Jim.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Slow left (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 17:41
Nick for England?
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Scrumper (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 17:41
Quote:Only if we win the CC.Big Jim
Remarkable.
Nick Compton.....can we call him God from now on?
...and not on Sundays.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 17:42
Nick's too good for England.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 17:42
Grockle - you may have been right. Perhaps England will send for Compton. Quite astonishing acceleration once he'd got to 120 or so.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Grizzers (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 17:44
Absolutely magnificent effort. Better than we could possibly have wished for.
Overs left ?
Grizzzly
Overs left ?
Grizzzly
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: tony in the pit of despair (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 17:47
Where are Compo's critics now?
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: wsm fan (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 17:57
I have always liked Compo.
I do think sometimes he could rotate strike a bit better, but i have not criticised him for being too slow.
Most criticise when we are bowled out cheaply playing shots so can't have it both ways.
Nick has showed today he really does have the shots to push on when he needs to, but in normal circumstances that is not the role the team want from him.
Fear he will not get half the credit he deserves for this as we have so many blinkered supporters who only watch home games, it's as is our away games dont feature in their opinions of players, almost "if i didnt see it it doesnt count"
Lets get 1 or 2 tonight to cap a pretty much perfect days cricket for us....
I do think sometimes he could rotate strike a bit better, but i have not criticised him for being too slow.
Most criticise when we are bowled out cheaply playing shots so can't have it both ways.
Nick has showed today he really does have the shots to push on when he needs to, but in normal circumstances that is not the role the team want from him.
Fear he will not get half the credit he deserves for this as we have so many blinkered supporters who only watch home games, it's as is our away games dont feature in their opinions of players, almost "if i didnt see it it doesnt count"
Lets get 1 or 2 tonight to cap a pretty much perfect days cricket for us....
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 18:07
I think the vast majority here are huge admirers of Nick.
Of course there'll be a few who have a whinge, but they'd be the same one who'd complain that their teas wasn't hot enough as the boys stood on the balcony celebrating the domestic treble.
Ignore them.
Of course there'll be a few who have a whinge, but they'd be the same one who'd complain that their teas wasn't hot enough as the boys stood on the balcony celebrating the domestic treble.
Ignore them.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 18:13
Well I've seen another welcome side of him in this game because I have thought of him as a player with one gear. Today he's done something more.
If the majority have always liked him on here, they kept it very close to their chests in his first season and a half though he has certainly brought them out into the open in the last few games. Very very good start to a season.
Have to also hope that this has pushed Arul and James especially to the extra level we all know they have. Now if we get Jos firing as well.......... Marcus can probably have a few days off to rest his injury.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012:04:21:18:31:01 by Grockle.
If the majority have always liked him on here, they kept it very close to their chests in his first season and a half though he has certainly brought them out into the open in the last few games. Very very good start to a season.
Have to also hope that this has pushed Arul and James especially to the extra level we all know they have. Now if we get Jos firing as well.......... Marcus can probably have a few days off to rest his injury.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012:04:21:18:31:01 by Grockle.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Grizzers (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 18:22
Just out of interest, who is our 12th man fielding ?
Grizzzly
Grizzzly
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Norwich SCCC (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 18:30
Superb stuff from all 3 batsmen - good omens for the rest of the season.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 18:34
I was being diplomatic....for once.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: RadstockRob (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 18:36
I think it's Andy Sutton Grizzly but not 100% sure. Perhaps AGod could answer as he was at the ground.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Little Bird (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 18:41
Well Done Somerset A very decent day! Congrats to Nick..again! and to James!! Form is temporary but class is permanent. Besides, he always makes a ton when he is the skipper!!!
A draw seems the most likely result but it would be an 11 pointer, which considering we don't have Marcus or Vernon and have lost so much time to rain, would still be creditable.
Hope we can push on for a win in the morning though. Get one early and their batting (Read apart) looks flimsy. Looks like my title tip Warks are set to win again so we could do with 16 points ourselves!
A very decent day! Congrats to Nick..again! and to James!! Form is temporary but class is permanent. Besides, he always makes a ton when he is the skipper!!!
A draw seems the most likely result but it would be an 11 pointer, which considering we don't have Marcus or Vernon and have lost so much time to rain, would still be creditable.
Hope we can push on for a win in the morning though. Get one early and their batting (Read apart) looks flimsy. Looks like my title tip Warks are set to win again so we could do with 16 points ourselves!
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Bagpuss (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 19:09
At one point this afternoon - I think it was just after Compton got his first 100, Parick Kidd tweeted that in this bowler-friendly start to the season Nick had faced the most balls in the County Championship - 900.
The next highest was 447.
If that doesn't reinforce what he's done in all three matches so far I don't know what does.
The next highest was 447.
If that doesn't reinforce what he's done in all three matches so far I don't know what does.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Botham (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 19:39
I thought Max Waller tweeted he was on his way up to Notts, so maybe he was 12th man?
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Bagpuss (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 19:42
Somerset are the first team to achieve maximum batting points in either division of he County Championship this season. Bucking the trend in these bowler-friendly times!
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Mike TA1 (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 19:49
Max Waller bowled and batted for the seconds today perhaps he is joining the first for the last day.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: tonysmalltoes (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 19:57
A great knock from Compton. Having watched him play through a testing Gurney spell yesterday afternoon and let Arul score the runs through the covers, Compo unleasehed this evening. Reverese sweeps, straight punches for six off Patel, pulls for six off Gurney. He must have been seeing it like a football.
Neither he nor Hildreth gave a chnace in the time i was there today, from around 4.10pm. Absolutely breautiful to watch. Sadly, however my money would be on a draw as the pitch looked flat as both Hales and Edwards looked comfortable. One shout for LBW against Edwards and a chinese cut, but a lot off the middle of the bat.
Really fine couple of days at very handsome ground.
Neither he nor Hildreth gave a chnace in the time i was there today, from around 4.10pm. Absolutely breautiful to watch. Sadly, however my money would be on a draw as the pitch looked flat as both Hales and Edwards looked comfortable. One shout for LBW against Edwards and a chinese cut, but a lot off the middle of the bat.
Really fine couple of days at very handsome ground.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Bagpuss (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 20:06
This is a fine read if you are a Somerset supporter - George Dobell's views on day 3 at Trent Bridge. If you are a Notts supporter I suggest looking away now.
[www.espncricinfo.com]
[www.espncricinfo.com]
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Bobstan (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 21:36
Yes, not at all a good read for Notts supporters, Bagpuss.
Almost the worst part seems to be the abject fielding.
I do feel a little sorry for poor Compton. He's a fine cricketer in his own right, and I wonder whether the almost inevitable comparisons with his grandfather irk him at times.
Mind you, I'm guilty of it on here with my remarks that his running between the wickets and calling are hereditary!
Almost the worst part seems to be the abject fielding.
I do feel a little sorry for poor Compton. He's a fine cricketer in his own right, and I wonder whether the almost inevitable comparisons with his grandfather irk him at times.
Mind you, I'm guilty of it on here with my remarks that his running between the wickets and calling are hereditary!
Re: Somersete in Notts at the Bridge?
Posted by: Roger Sweet (IP Logged)
Date: 21/04/2012 21:48
Quote:old boy!
What would be the ideal outcome??
Somerset 450 - 1 dec
Notts 199 and 250
Somerset Max points Notts none! Job done!!
This was Old Boy's quote on 18th at 08.56!!! Are you wonderfully psychic - Old Boy???? Will you give me next week's lottery numbers, please????
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: geordie moonraker (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 00:17
My memory tells me that it is a rare occurrence for a team to get NO bowling points when a innings has not been truncated by rain. Any stats as to if it has happened...bearing in mind that it is only 3 wickets in 110 overs?
Incidentally I see the Warwickshire tail "failed" agan today.
Compton isa very correct batsman, who because of his correctness often hits a fielder. I would think his proprtion of boundaries is fairly low but he seems to have worked out that 3 twos an over is quick.
Lovely day, although i think we shall have ot settle for a draw if the weather doesn't help us.
Incidentally I see the Warwickshire tail "failed" agan today.
Compton isa very correct batsman, who because of his correctness often hits a fielder. I would think his proprtion of boundaries is fairly low but he seems to have worked out that 3 twos an over is quick.
Lovely day, although i think we shall have ot settle for a draw if the weather doesn't help us.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 06:39
Sutton came on as 13th man for Kirby near the end (hope there's not a problem there.)
I thought Max Waller was fielding for Tres but Mike says he was at the seconds game? In which case no idea who Tres's fill-in was.
One thing yet to be touched on; We have some making up to do to hold onto our hard-earned bonus points. We were behind the over-rate in our first innings and have fallen further behind in the second.
With the forecast uncertain, I think we'll need a burst of George/Arul fairly early. Otherwise, if we don't bowl them then I think we are currently looking at a 2 point deduction - I believe the rule is minus one point for each over behind?
It was notable yesterday evening that Steve Kirby, in particular, was bowling a very full length. I think this probably indicates his belief that the pitch will not help him so he is probably looking for swing and/or yorkers.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012:04:22:06:56:04 by AGod.
I thought Max Waller was fielding for Tres but Mike says he was at the seconds game? In which case no idea who Tres's fill-in was.
One thing yet to be touched on; We have some making up to do to hold onto our hard-earned bonus points. We were behind the over-rate in our first innings and have fallen further behind in the second.
With the forecast uncertain, I think we'll need a burst of George/Arul fairly early. Otherwise, if we don't bowl them then I think we are currently looking at a 2 point deduction - I believe the rule is minus one point for each over behind?
It was notable yesterday evening that Steve Kirby, in particular, was bowling a very full length. I think this probably indicates his belief that the pitch will not help him so he is probably looking for swing and/or yorkers.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012:04:22:06:56:04 by AGod.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 06:54
Interesting to read about George Dobell's contempt for the fitness levels of Notts.
For my lunch, in the excellent Larwood and Voce kitchen, I had a fish platter, washed down with the local ale.
Lunching next to me were Andre Adams, Mike Newell and some other Notts player.
Both players had a colossal steak sandwich with dripping-fried chips. The Sam Allardyce/Arsene Wenger approach to spirts science, this was not. The coach also had dripping fried chips, in his case with battered cod. Of course none of those men were playing in this match, but still..
The previous night, Big Ben, James Tsylor and two others came in for cakes when play was abandoned. For anyone lucky enough to be going today, may I suggest the lemon cake?
I agree with George D that we treated their bowling with disdain. I'm not sure that I would say that their bowling was all that bad, though, more a function of a peach of a batting surface.
Harry Gurney looks like a man who would be a fine bowler in Madras in the 70s or Perth in the 80s, but he will certainly need to bowl a far fuller length on soft early season tracks! He bowled short so often that I think it must have been intentional as opposed to radar malfunction. He did have the ability to trouble Compton with some bounce though.
For my lunch, in the excellent Larwood and Voce kitchen, I had a fish platter, washed down with the local ale.
Lunching next to me were Andre Adams, Mike Newell and some other Notts player.
Both players had a colossal steak sandwich with dripping-fried chips. The Sam Allardyce/Arsene Wenger approach to spirts science, this was not. The coach also had dripping fried chips, in his case with battered cod. Of course none of those men were playing in this match, but still..
The previous night, Big Ben, James Tsylor and two others came in for cakes when play was abandoned. For anyone lucky enough to be going today, may I suggest the lemon cake?
I agree with George D that we treated their bowling with disdain. I'm not sure that I would say that their bowling was all that bad, though, more a function of a peach of a batting surface.
Harry Gurney looks like a man who would be a fine bowler in Madras in the 70s or Perth in the 80s, but he will certainly need to bowl a far fuller length on soft early season tracks! He bowled short so often that I think it must have been intentional as opposed to radar malfunction. He did have the ability to trouble Compton with some bounce though.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 07:02
We'll see what happens today.
But in terms of our attack operating without quite a few personnel;
By the end of today I suspect we'll be saying that they have been tested only in extremes... Conditions loaded in their favour in the first dig and loaded against them in the second. In other words, not tested in anything resembling 'average,' bowling conditions.
Could be a lot of work for Meschede today and Gregory if the back is willing. Big chance for both to impress Brian and James by running in hard and being 'at,' the Notts batsmen in unfavourable conditions. Of course, neither man got much bowling in the first dig.
Oh, btw.... I have now been to TBridge in successive years and have now seen FIVE different SCCC tons on the ground, from four different players (James having done it twice.)
Next year, I should like to see Jos make one on this ground..
But in terms of our attack operating without quite a few personnel;
By the end of today I suspect we'll be saying that they have been tested only in extremes... Conditions loaded in their favour in the first dig and loaded against them in the second. In other words, not tested in anything resembling 'average,' bowling conditions.
Could be a lot of work for Meschede today and Gregory if the back is willing. Big chance for both to impress Brian and James by running in hard and being 'at,' the Notts batsmen in unfavourable conditions. Of course, neither man got much bowling in the first dig.
Oh, btw.... I have now been to TBridge in successive years and have now seen FIVE different SCCC tons on the ground, from four different players (James having done it twice.)
Next year, I should like to see Jos make one on this ground..
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 07:29
Comments from Brian imply a busy day for George D and, perhaps, Arul.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: SheptonPaul (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 08:23
I was a bit surprised George didn't have an over or two last night. If we need to make up overs between the showers today, it should be a busy day for him.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 08:29
Aye, SP.
I think that, realistically, there might also come a point where Brian has to make an assessment of how hard we push Pete/Kirby?
Those two are, more or less, the last men standing in terms of bowlers with much experience.
The games come thick and fast, with the next one starting on Thursday. We hope Philander will be available, obviously. But I don't think I'd put my house on it.
I suspect we may see not much more than an opening burst from Steve and Pete (assuming Steve went off early to simply have a shower or what have you) and then we'll see the three far younger and more inexperienced bowlers getting overs under their belts.
Obviously, if the ball suddenly starts swinging then that would change that picture.
I think that, realistically, there might also come a point where Brian has to make an assessment of how hard we push Pete/Kirby?
Those two are, more or less, the last men standing in terms of bowlers with much experience.
The games come thick and fast, with the next one starting on Thursday. We hope Philander will be available, obviously. But I don't think I'd put my house on it.
I suspect we may see not much more than an opening burst from Steve and Pete (assuming Steve went off early to simply have a shower or what have you) and then we'll see the three far younger and more inexperienced bowlers getting overs under their belts.
Obviously, if the ball suddenly starts swinging then that would change that picture.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Little Bird (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 08:58
If the England selectors are looking for fresh blood in the wake of disappointing batting performances last winter, they could do worse than consider NC. He has an excellent technique and temperament, a first-class average of 40 and has made three 200s in the past year. He's a good fielder too.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 09:05
Already been mooted here. But as you all know CC1 form is not something they take into account. Present First class average of 133 is not something to be sneezed at though.
He did look good yesterday and the way he pushed on was very encouraging. James coming in and doing what he does so effortlessly (it seems) in his good seasons was also excellent.
AG - in the absence of Tres and if the weather stays kind, you may yet see a Jos ton if we need big runs quickly towards the end of this game!!!!
He did look good yesterday and the way he pushed on was very encouraging. James coming in and doing what he does so effortlessly (it seems) in his good seasons was also excellent.
AG - in the absence of Tres and if the weather stays kind, you may yet see a Jos ton if we need big runs quickly towards the end of this game!!!!
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 09:12
Simon Hughes, writing in Wisden claims that the single biggest thing that Andy Flower has brought to the table was the following key insight; That stats actually show that the majority of 'daddy hundreds,' show no acceleration at all. Apparently the same stats show that players who increase their scoring rate when they get past 100 usually fail to go past 130.
Apparently, England batsmen are under orders to bat at the same pace throughout their innings; to stay in their comfort zone. There isn't a prescribed pace; it depends on natural style of the player BUT the batsmen are under orders to bat at the same rate, throughout. Apparently the results, in terms of double tons, show a huge percentage increase. I think the figure was more double tons under Flower, than in the previous decade!
If I was picking the England team then Compton would have needed to show me the type of thing that he did show yesterday. However, it appears that such a thing may not matter one jot to Flower.
Apparently, England batsmen are under orders to bat at the same pace throughout their innings; to stay in their comfort zone. There isn't a prescribed pace; it depends on natural style of the player BUT the batsmen are under orders to bat at the same rate, throughout. Apparently the results, in terms of double tons, show a huge percentage increase. I think the figure was more double tons under Flower, than in the previous decade!
If I was picking the England team then Compton would have needed to show me the type of thing that he did show yesterday. However, it appears that such a thing may not matter one jot to Flower.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: SheptonPaul (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 09:16
It may be important, maybe even significant, but I can't believe that's the "single biggest thing" Flower has "brought to the table".
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 09:20
Yep, Grockle. I don't think many (any?) players go straight into the England team without playing in the Lions first, nowadays?
So one would think Nick would get a Lions' call before a full one.
I'm trying to think what the Lions team may look like for the first-class game vs Windies.
In terms of non SCCC players, I'd think we'd see Root, Hales, Taylor, Bairstow and Stokes getting top six batting slots? That would leave one slot where I think it is most likely to be one of our guys, be it Nick, James or Craig K. And then it's possible they may want to look at Jos's keeping and bat him seven.
So one would think Nick would get a Lions' call before a full one.
I'm trying to think what the Lions team may look like for the first-class game vs Windies.
In terms of non SCCC players, I'd think we'd see Root, Hales, Taylor, Bairstow and Stokes getting top six batting slots? That would leave one slot where I think it is most likely to be one of our guys, be it Nick, James or Craig K. And then it's possible they may want to look at Jos's keeping and bat him seven.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Little Bird (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 09:32
I do hope it rains at Liverpool today. I have a nasty feeling Warks are going to walk away with the title
I'm glad everybody up at Notts is enjoying the match, despite the weather. Thanks for all your postings
I'm glad everybody up at Notts is enjoying the match, despite the weather. Thanks for all your postings
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 09:38
Lancs got thumped in their first game, too.
So I'm not sure I'd read that much into Lancs vs Warks.
As Bagpuss has pointed out, Aigburth seems a toss-decisive ground. Win the toss. Bat second. Win the match.
So I'm not sure I'd read that much into Lancs vs Warks.
As Bagpuss has pointed out, Aigburth seems a toss-decisive ground. Win the toss. Bat second. Win the match.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 09:43
Quote:SheptonPaul
It may be important, maybe even significant, but I can't believe that's the "single biggest thing" Flower has "brought to the table".
I think the intended point was not that it was bringing the stat to the table, but rather the interpretation of the stat and consequent change in team batting strategy. And, of course, the results of that strategy. It used to be the case that other teams scored daddy hundreds much more frequently than England, apparently, and now the boot is on the other foot.
I don't mean that England used to necessarily have lots of daddy hundreds scored in matches against them, just that a number of other Test teams would make more of them over any given period of time.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Little Bird (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 09:48
Lancs could arrive at Taunton next week very dispirited.
Warks just frighten me..they look nothing on paper..but the likes of Barker, Wright etc just keep taking wickets. They've already won one match they shouldn't have (sighs) and in their current one they were 82-7 before a 240 odd partnership. I think if they get early momentum, they could be very dangerous.
Anyway it's only predictions. Most important thing is that Somerset do well today. How's the weather AG?
Warks just frighten me..they look nothing on paper..but the likes of Barker, Wright etc just keep taking wickets. They've already won one match they shouldn't have (sighs) and in their current one they were 82-7 before a 240 odd partnership. I think if they get early momentum, they could be very dangerous.
Anyway it's only predictions. Most important thing is that Somerset do well today. How's the weather AG?
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 09:57
Sadly, I have to attend the London marathon today, but I will have a spy at the game.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Little Bird (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 10:03
Wow you running?
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 10:13
Ha ha. No responsible for looking after some of those that are.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Slow left (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 10:19
Now I'm hungry.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 10:20
Warks have had stop and start seasons in the past.
It's only three games in presently so I don't think they are exactly running away with it at the moment. Maybe it might be more sensible to wait until we are in phase 8 or so before we think about predicting the winners of 2012.
Remember that the CC is now quite definitely a 'game of two halves'
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012:04:22:10:28:43 by Grockle.
It's only three games in presently so I don't think they are exactly running away with it at the moment. Maybe it might be more sensible to wait until we are in phase 8 or so before we think about predicting the winners of 2012.
Remember that the CC is now quite definitely a 'game of two halves'
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012:04:22:10:28:43 by Grockle.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 10:25
Especially as the overseas spots often seem to change for the second half.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Little Bird (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 10:30
No, but it's natural at the start of any season to have fun making predictions! And mine is Warks for the title, though I hope it's us
Btw Grockle, Well Done on your excellent comments abou Arul two weeks ago. You were so right that he would come good
Three games in, and all our top 6 bar Marcus have passed 50 at least once and 3 have hit hundreds, with another falling just short. So far so good
Btw Grockle, Well Done on your excellent comments abou Arul two weeks ago. You were so right that he would come good
Three games in, and all our top 6 bar Marcus have passed 50 at least once and 3 have hit hundreds, with another falling just short. So far so good
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 10:46
It's almost like having Naxaar back.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 10:47
Perhaps he has flown back?
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 11:25
No Kirby.....any news?
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 11:32
Hecwentvoff yesterday, BJ. I thought it was odd. Did not 'see,' an injury. We cannot afford to lose him too.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Big Jim (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 11:38
Great start....Kirby has a hamstring problem...dear oh dear.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012:04:22:11:38:49 by Big Jim.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012:04:22:11:38:49 by Big Jim.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Slow left (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 12:09
Hopefully we can get a couple more to finish off the tail, although then we'll get to their good batters.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 12:18
Kirby did not pull up or anything so hopefully just a niggle.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Bagpuss (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 12:52
Lancs 60-6 now at Aigburth. Plenty of blue sky around so the weaher isn't going to save them.
But remember - last season Notts won their firs four matches and we were all wondering how anyone, let alons Somerset after losing the first two matches, was going to catch them.They finished 6th. Its a marathon not a sprint.
But remember - last season Notts won their firs four matches and we were all wondering how anyone, let alons Somerset after losing the first two matches, was going to catch them.They finished 6th. Its a marathon not a sprint.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: edinburghbil (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 12:53
Gregory not bowling either ?
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: RadstockRob (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 14:37
Play to restart at 1500. 43 overs left to bowl them out!
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Mike TA1 (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 14:53
@#$*@ the weather.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 15:40
Will Brian need to exploit the loan Market for a bowler?
Kirby unlikely to play vs Lancs. Hussain unlikely to play. Dibble certain to not play. Philander? Who knows?
Lewis Gregory, in the brief spell I saw of him, looks like he is some way from where he would need to be with the ball perhaps he is still feeling his way back from the injury?
So that leaves Pete, coming off heroics here, and Meschede as the only seam bowlers that, so far as I can see, are or should be sure starters vs Lancs?
Kirby unlikely to play vs Lancs. Hussain unlikely to play. Dibble certain to not play. Philander? Who knows?
Lewis Gregory, in the brief spell I saw of him, looks like he is some way from where he would need to be with the ball perhaps he is still feeling his way back from the injury?
So that leaves Pete, coming off heroics here, and Meschede as the only seam bowlers that, so far as I can see, are or should be sure starters vs Lancs?
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 15:49
I assume we are now going to suffer a points deduction for poor over-rate? Or did we catch up this morning despite light bowling for George?
If we do suffer a deduction it will be annoying and sloppy and - points wise - will undo some of the excellent work that Compton and Hildreth did yesterday afternoon.
We were -1 on first innings and contrived to fall to -2 overall just in that mini-session at the end of yesterday. What I am unsure of is whether the -2 calculation already includes an allowance for the injury to Tres, or whether it will be treated as a mitigating circumstance, after the fact?
If we do suffer a deduction it will be annoying and sloppy and - points wise - will undo some of the excellent work that Compton and Hildreth did yesterday afternoon.
We were -1 on first innings and contrived to fall to -2 overall just in that mini-session at the end of yesterday. What I am unsure of is whether the -2 calculation already includes an allowance for the injury to Tres, or whether it will be treated as a mitigating circumstance, after the fact?
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: edinburghbil (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 16:01
One would hope Phillander would play!!! So, Trego, Meschede, and GD would make up a four, leaving us one bowling place to fill. Lewis and Arul can presumably provide some support. Aside from Max, who else is in line ? Not that I'm saying Max shouldn't play ;-)
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Grizzers (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 16:12
Four down now. Well done George.
Six more to go in whatever sparse time we have left.
Then we can do a 'walking wounded' count !
Grizzzly
Six more to go in whatever sparse time we have left.
Then we can do a 'walking wounded' count !
Grizzzly
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 16:18
Sorry, Grizzly, thought we were off for the day. If George is back on hopefully we can catch up on over-rate.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Grizzers (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 16:21
If we are looking at an potential over rate penalty, why not put on Arul & George in tandem ?
Grizzzly
Grizzzly
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: SheptonPaul (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 16:28
Presumably because they still think they can win the game? A one or two point penalty off 22 would be better than off 11, I guess.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 16:32
The Tres injury will have been equivalent to one over of time. Possibly even about 1.5. So it might be that that will be taken into consideration after the fact?
But by the close yesterday the scoreboard read 'Notts 0, Somerset 8,' under the points column. But the adjacent column read -2 against our name. So the board read Somerset 8-2.
During the Middx game I think the commentators said that a new, draconian points system sees one point removed for every over behind the required rate. I think they said one team has already lost 5 points this season in deductions?
More reason than ever to try to produce dry surfaces and win with a spin based attack, IMO.
But by the close yesterday the scoreboard read 'Notts 0, Somerset 8,' under the points column. But the adjacent column read -2 against our name. So the board read Somerset 8-2.
During the Middx game I think the commentators said that a new, draconian points system sees one point removed for every over behind the required rate. I think they said one team has already lost 5 points this season in deductions?
More reason than ever to try to produce dry surfaces and win with a spin based attack, IMO.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 16:37
Quote:SheptonPaul
Presumably because they still think they can win the game? A one or two point penalty off 22 would be better than off 11, I guess.
Yeah, but you need a clear weather window to be able to think that way. If you know it's going to be dry you can plan to go 'at,' Notts for so long, then call the dogs off and stick the spinners on at a point where you no longer think you can win.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: SheptonPaul (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 16:51
Gregory, rather than Suppiah, has replaced Meschede now - inplies to me they're not so worried about any points deduction.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: hantssabre (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 16:54
Commentators said a while back that Somerset were well ahead of the over rate
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 16:57
Good, thanks Hants.
It may be that James had the seamers get a wriggle on with their overs, too.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012:04:22:17:10:51 by AGod.
It may be that James had the seamers get a wriggle on with their overs, too.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012:04:22:17:10:51 by AGod.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: edinburghbil (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 17:39
Could be a b**ger if you are planning to catch up on your run rate and it rains. Presumably you can't use a declaration to ensure a side gets penalised for run rate ?
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Bagpuss (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 18:04
Steve Kirby reckons he'll be fit for the Lancs game.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 18:24
Quote:edinburghbil
Could be a b**ger if you are planning to catch up on your run rate and it rains. Presumably you can't use a declaration to ensure a side gets penalised for run rate ?
That's a very good question.
I would guess that the answer would be the same as for denying an opponent bonus points - you cannot declare specifically so that your opponent loses points for a poor over-rate.
Obviously if you are declaring to help your own team win the game then that would be fine.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: West Country Gooner (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 19:03
Lets hope so, From your post Bagpuss it sounds like a minor injury Fingers Crossed.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: SheptonPaul (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 20:31
After agreeing with Mick Newell's damning criticism of Notts, George Dobell sums Somerset's last few days up thus:
"Somerset, not for the first time in recent years, had to be content with narrowly missing out on their goal. But bearing in mind their injury situation they can take a great deal of pride from the game. They were superior in all departments and, for the second week in a row, were denied victory by a slim margin. If they keep playing such fine cricket then, sooner or later, their luck will surely turn."
"Somerset, not for the first time in recent years, had to be content with narrowly missing out on their goal. But bearing in mind their injury situation they can take a great deal of pride from the game. They were superior in all departments and, for the second week in a row, were denied victory by a slim margin. If they keep playing such fine cricket then, sooner or later, their luck will surely turn."
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Mike TA1 (IP Logged)
Date: 22/04/2012 21:02
Here here to that.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Kentish Townie (IP Logged)
Date: 23/04/2012 14:51
It was pointed out a few weeks ago that our seam bowling resources were thin. It's still April and we're seeing the consequences.
Kirby.Philander and especially Trego have performed well but in today's packed schedule you need rotation of at least 5 established specialist seamers - that's before all rounders like Gregory and Meschede and Trego.
We have four and with at least two injured it means it's a problem, however heroically PT has responded.
Kirby.Philander and especially Trego have performed well but in today's packed schedule you need rotation of at least 5 established specialist seamers - that's before all rounders like Gregory and Meschede and Trego.
We have four and with at least two injured it means it's a problem, however heroically PT has responded.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 23/04/2012 15:41
So the present problem is? Philander returning so the massive crisis is less of a massive crisis.
Again you told us something that most counties face (unless you have names of all those clubs that have 5 seamers to rotate).
No other injuries appearing in other counties?
Warwickshire at full strength?
Middlesex at full strength?
We do the best we can with what we got. Good job we've got decent all rounders isn't it?
Again you told us something that most counties face (unless you have names of all those clubs that have 5 seamers to rotate).
No other injuries appearing in other counties?
Warwickshire at full strength?
Middlesex at full strength?
We do the best we can with what we got. Good job we've got decent all rounders isn't it?
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Kentish Townie (IP Logged)
Date: 23/04/2012 19:31
If you look at Surrey they have the following squad of Seamers.
Tremlett
Dernbach
Lewis
Meaker
Linley
All pretty established performers. I would argue you take any three from those add an allrounder and a spinner and you have a decent bowling lineup.
Tremlett
Dernbach
Lewis
Meaker
Linley
All pretty established performers. I would argue you take any three from those add an allrounder and a spinner and you have a decent bowling lineup.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 23/04/2012 19:37
One of those, KT is all but certain to be on ODI duty. Another (Meaker) may join Dernbach.
If fit, and in form, Tremlett may be in the Test side.
If fit, and in form, Tremlett may be in the Test side.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 23/04/2012 20:14
And with Tremlett the words 'if fit' are pretty apt.
Not much better than us when you look at it are they?
Stating a situation as if it is a weakness suffered only by one county tends to fall to bits when other counties seem to
have the same issue KT
You've criticised us for a number of years for not generating this mass of home grown seamers but have yet to offer any other county that has solved this "Somerset disease" in their own area. (I might give you Durham perhaps on a good week)
Not much better than us when you look at it are they?
Stating a situation as if it is a weakness suffered only by one county tends to fall to bits when other counties seem to
have the same issue KT
You've criticised us for a number of years for not generating this mass of home grown seamers but have yet to offer any other county that has solved this "Somerset disease" in their own area. (I might give you Durham perhaps on a good week)
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: AGod (IP Logged)
Date: 23/04/2012 20:38
I'm not sure that it's not a bit of a worry, generally?
How many of the better pacemen on the circuit are the south side of 30?
Not sure how many young pacemen are around and doing well at any of the counties?
How many of the better pacemen on the circuit are the south side of 30?
Not sure how many young pacemen are around and doing well at any of the counties?
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Grockle (IP Logged)
Date: 23/04/2012 20:44
Well hopefully we'll be able to talk about Meschede, Gregory and eventually Dibble (possibly even an Overton) doing well at theirs before the end of 2012
We've as much chance as some others it seems.
We've as much chance as some others it seems.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: old boy! (IP Logged)
Date: 24/04/2012 11:47
Perversely, although it does create some problems the unfortunate run of injuries does enable the young talent to be 'properly tested' in real important match situations. As a long term advocate of giving the youngsters opportunities to prove to us AND THEMSELVES whether they have 'what it takes' to survive until real pressure, I see the current problems as ways for the management to make some initial but eventually longer term decisions on individuals merits.
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 24/04/2012 12:51
Quote:Grockle
Well hopefully we'll be able to talk about Meschede, Gregory and eventually Dibble (possibly even an Overton) doing well at theirs before the end of 2012
I'm really worried about 2025, when all those named above will be the wrong side of thirty...
LoL
Sixty-six Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: old boy! (IP Logged)
Date: 24/04/2012 13:08
Quote:By then they will or could be 'something in the city', 'something in the media' or further subjects of 'oldish' grocklees on how much longer could they carry on playing cricket at first class level, including vague hints from a very very old Lol, or complicated analysis from an 'olderish' AGod!!Loyal of Lhasa.Quote:Grockle
Well hopefully we'll be able to talk about Meschede, Gregory and eventually Dibble (possibly even an Overton) doing well at theirs before the end of 2012
I'm really worried about 2025, when all those named above will be the wrong side of thirty...
Re: Trigger ties Notts in Knots!!
Posted by: Loyal of Lhasa. (IP Logged)
Date: 24/04/2012 14:46
AGod shall not grow old and age shall not weary LoL
LoL
Sixty-six Seasons a Somerset Supporter
LoL
Sixty-six Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.